Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

So many wheel building questions...

Started by John Haas · · Last activity · 10 posts · 847 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
14 January 2005
Last activity
16 January 2005
Original author
John Haas
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
847
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ok, I'm a novice wheel builder and there are several things I don't
    understand yet. If any of you verterans out there can help me I would
    sure appreciate it.

    A couple of weeks ago I rebuilt an old set of wheels with new hubs and
    had fun doing it. Of course I was armed with Jobst Brandt's book which
    made things fairly routine. On these wheels I didn't have to worry
    about determining spoke length.
    This first wheel project emboldened me to attempt something I've been
    wanting to do for a couple of years. I've had a brand new pair of
    Mavic Open Pro 700c 36 hole rims laying about that I've been wanting
    to build up. The only major stumbling block was what spoke length to
    use. I downloaded Spocalc and proceeded to enter in the rim/hub
    (Shimano 105) info and it told me that, on the front wheel, the spoke
    length should be 294.8mm. The rear wheel needed 292.4 and 291.3mm
    spokes. This is with a 3X pattern throughout. I rounded the numbers
    off to the nearest whole millimeter and ordered the spokes. I
    attempted to build up the front wheel but quickly determined that the
    spokes were too long. I don't know what went wrong with the spoke
    calculations but probably the spokes I ordered for the rear wheel are
    too long also. I'm guessing these spokes are in the neighborhood of
    3mm too long but I don't know for sure.
    My questions are...
    What did I do wrong with Spocalc to come up with a too high spoke
    length?
    What is this with a crossing pattern value that allows decimals? How
    can you have a crossing pattern of 2.25 for example?
    Has anyone, by chance, put together a set of wheels using Mavic Open
    Pro 700c 36 hole rims and Shimano 105 hubs who could just flat tell me
    the proper spokes lengths to use?
    Thanks!

  2. John Haas said:

    This first wheel project emboldened me to attempt something I've been
    wanting to do for a couple of years. I've had a brand new pair of
    Mavic Open Pro 700c 36 hole rims laying about that I've been wanting
    to build up. The only major stumbling block was what spoke length to
    use. I downloaded Spocalc and proceeded to enter in the rim/hub
    (Shimano 105) info and it told me that, on the front wheel, the spoke
    length should be 294.8mm. The rear wheel needed 292.4 and 291.3mm
    spokes. This is with a 3X pattern throughout. I rounded the numbers
    off to the nearest whole millimeter and ordered the spokes. I
    attempted to build up the front wheel but quickly determined that the
    spokes were too long. I don't know what went wrong with the spoke
    calculations but probably the spokes I ordered for the rear wheel are
    too long also. I'm guessing these spokes are in the neighborhood of
    3mm too long but I don't know for sure.
    My questions are...
    What did I do wrong with Spocalc to come up with a too high spoke
    length?

    Are you sure the spokes are the length you ordered?
    I'd recommend measuring everything yourself. The required measurements and
    equations are listed in The Bicycle Wheel.

    Spokes should be measure from the inside of the elbow to the other end.

    Quoted message said:

    What is this with a crossing pattern value that allows decimals? How
    can you have a crossing pattern of 2.25 for example?

    One possibility: it was easier to make an interface that didn't bother
    checking for integral input.

    Another: It's to allow for strange spoking patterns. You can't really have
    "cross 2.5", of course, but you could have a spoking pattern that puts some
    spokes at holes in the rim in between where they would be for cross 2 and
    cross 3.

    --
    Benjamin Lewis

    Luke, I'm yer father, eh. Come over to the dark side, you hoser.
    -- Dave Thomas, "Strange Brew"

  3. Benjamin Lewis wrote:
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What is this with a crossing pattern value that allows decimals?


    How

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    can you have a crossing pattern of 2.25 for example?

    One possibility: it was easier to make an interface that didn't


    bother

    Quoted message said:

    checking for integral input.

    Another: It's to allow for strange spoking patterns. You can't


    really have

    Quoted message said:

    "cross 2.5", of course, but you could have a spoking pattern that


    puts some

    Quoted message said:

    spokes at holes in the rim in between where they would be for cross 2


    and

    Quoted message said:

    cross 3.

    The latter, I think. Crow's foot lacing can require oddball
    calculations, IIRC. Also, working around mismatched spoke hole counts
    (i.e. 36-hole hub, 28-hole rim) would require length tweaks.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Benjamin Lewis

    Luke, I'm yer father, eh. Come over to the dark side, you hoser.
    -- Dave Thomas, "Strange Brew"

    Geez. You must be only other person on the planet who saw that movie,
    eh.

    Jeff

  4. Quoted message said:
    Benjamin Lewis said:


    Another: It's to allow for strange spoking patterns. You can't really
    have "cross 2.5", of course, but you could have a spoking pattern that
    puts some spokes at holes in the rim in between where they would be for
    cross 2 and cross 3.

    The latter, I think. Crow's foot lacing can require oddball
    calculations, IIRC. Also, working around mismatched spoke hole counts
    (i.e. 36-hole hub, 28-hole rim) would require length tweaks.

    Funny you should mention that, I did exactly that last year:

    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/mismatch/index.htm
    http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~bclewis/personal/bike/fixie9a.jpg

    However, in this case, the offsets are weird enough that it's probably
    easier to do without using spokecalc; it's no longer obvious what one
    should enter for "cross pattern".

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Luke, I'm yer father, eh. Come over to the dark side, you hoser.
    -- Dave Thomas, "Strange Brew"

    Geez. You must be only other person on the planet who saw that movie,
    eh.

    Take off, most of my friends have seen it too, eh? I'm like, not the only
    person in Canada, ya know.

    --
    Benjamin Lewis

    Luke, I'm yer father, eh. Come over to the dark side, you hoser.
    -- Dave Thomas, "Strange Brew"

  5. John Haas said:

    Ok, I'm a novice wheel builder and there are several things I don't
    understand yet. If any of you verterans out there can help me I would
    sure appreciate it.
    .....
    What did I do wrong with Spocalc to come up with a too high spoke
    length?

    This probably won't help but recently I built a front wheel from an old
    Suzue hub and Sun CR18 rim. I had to measure the hub myself and enter
    it into Spocalc. It gave me a number which I thought was too long but
    I ordered the spokes anyhow and built it up. As I was building it the
    spokes still seemed too long. When I finally got it properly tensioned
    and trued the spokes were fine. The bottom of the spokes were almost
    flush with the bottom of the nipples.

    I'm mentioning this in case you didn't finish your build before
    deciding the spokes were too long.

    Tom

  6. John Haas said:

    Ok, I'm a novice wheel builder and there are several things I don't
    understand yet. If any of you verterans out there can help me I would
    sure appreciate it.

    A couple of weeks ago I rebuilt an old set of wheels with new hubs and
    had fun doing it. Of course I was armed with Jobst Brandt's book which
    made things fairly routine. On these wheels I didn't have to worry
    about determining spoke length.
    This first wheel project emboldened me to attempt something I've been
    wanting to do for a couple of years. I've had a brand new pair of
    Mavic Open Pro 700c 36 hole rims laying about that I've been wanting
    to build up. The only major stumbling block was what spoke length to
    use. I downloaded Spocalc and proceeded to enter in the rim/hub
    (Shimano 105) info and it told me that, on the front wheel, the spoke
    length should be 294.8mm. The rear wheel needed 292.4 and 291.3mm
    spokes. This is with a 3X pattern throughout. I rounded the numbers
    off to the nearest whole millimeter and ordered the spokes. I
    attempted to build up the front wheel but quickly determined that the
    spokes were too long. I don't know what went wrong with the spoke
    calculations but probably the spokes I ordered for the rear wheel are
    too long also. I'm guessing these spokes are in the neighborhood of
    3mm too long but I don't know for sure.
    My questions are...
    What did I do wrong with Spocalc to come up with a too high spoke
    length?
    What is this with a crossing pattern value that allows decimals? How
    can you have a crossing pattern of 2.25 for example?
    Has anyone, by chance, put together a set of wheels using Mavic Open
    Pro 700c 36 hole rims and Shimano 105 hubs who could just flat tell me
    the proper spokes lengths to use?
    Thanks!

    John,

    One subtle aspect of spokcalc is that it considers ERD to be the
    distance from nipple bed to nipple bed PLUS the thickness of the "nipple
    head". The reason it does this is that there are still good threads in
    there, and that's what counts in terms of spoke length - not nipple bed
    to nipple bed, but 'end of nipple to end of nipple when seated in the
    rim'.

    From the instructions:

    ----
    Effective Rim Diameter (ERD) is the diameter on which you want the ends
    of the spokes to lie. Most people prefer it near the end of the spoke
    nipple. If you want to measure your own rim (recommended, just to be
    sure), then follow these instructions:

    Insert two old spokes into holes exactly opposite each other on the rim.
    Count holes to be sure.
    Screw some nipples onto the spokes.
    Pull them tight and measure dimension A in the figure (the diameter to
    the edge of the nipples, where the spokes dissapears into them). Do this
    at several spots around the rim and average the measurements.
    Measure the length of a nipple (dimension B in the figure) and add it
    twice (once for each nipple). The result is Effective Rim Diameter
    (ERD). Thus,
    ERD = A + 2B.

    Effective Rim Diameter (ERD) is the dimension you type into the
    spreadsheet for "ERD, effective rim diameter". Of all the dimensions you
    actually might measure, ERD is the most critical dimension affecting
    spoke length, so it makes sense to measure it a few times at different
    places around the rim. Always count to make sure you use spoke holes
    that are actually opposite each other!
    ----

    So how could this explain too long spokes? Well, maybe it can't, but
    in my experience, if I use the ERD database in Spocalc, or the method of
    measuring where I include the nipple head, my spokes tend to be almost
    too long. So I typically directly measure the ERD and use the true ERD
    of the rim in spocalc, not counting the nipple heads.

    Kyle

  7. A simpler approach...

    http://www.excelsports.com/info.asp?page=9

    Mike Lackey
    Madison, AL

    "John Haas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok, I'm a novice wheel builder and there are several things I don't
    understand yet. If any of you verterans out there can help me I would
    sure appreciate it.

    A couple of weeks ago I rebuilt an old set of wheels with new hubs and
    had fun doing it. Of course I was armed with Jobst Brandt's book which
    made things fairly routine. On these wheels I didn't have to worry
    about determining spoke length.
    This first wheel project emboldened me to attempt something I've been
    wanting to do for a couple of years. I've had a brand new pair of
    Mavic Open Pro 700c 36 hole rims laying about that I've been wanting
    to build up. The only major stumbling block was what spoke length to
    use. I downloaded Spocalc and proceeded to enter in the rim/hub
    (Shimano 105) info and it told me that, on the front wheel, the spoke
    length should be 294.8mm. The rear wheel needed 292.4 and 291.3mm
    spokes. This is with a 3X pattern throughout. I rounded the numbers
    off to the nearest whole millimeter and ordered the spokes. I
    attempted to build up the front wheel but quickly determined that the
    spokes were too long. I don't know what went wrong with the spoke
    calculations but probably the spokes I ordered for the rear wheel are
    too long also. I'm guessing these spokes are in the neighborhood of
    3mm too long but I don't know for sure.
    My questions are...
    What did I do wrong with Spocalc to come up with a too high spoke
    length?
    What is this with a crossing pattern value that allows decimals? How
    can you have a crossing pattern of 2.25 for example?
    Has anyone, by chance, put together a set of wheels using Mavic Open
    Pro 700c 36 hole rims and Shimano 105 hubs who could just flat tell me
    the proper spokes lengths to use?
    Thanks!

  8. John Haas wrote:
    -snip-

    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone, by chance, put together a set of wheels using Mavic Open
    Pro 700c 36 hole rims and Shimano 105 hubs who could just flat tell me
    the proper spokes lengths to use?

    We list 293 front and left, 291 right side.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  9. The DT Swiss spoke calculator came up with 294mm.
    http://www.dtswiss.com/spokescalc/Calculator.aspx

    Kenny


  10. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    --
    Benjamin Lewis

    Luke, I'm yer father, eh. Come over to the dark side, you hoser.
    -- Dave Thomas, "Strange Brew"

    Geez. You must be only other person on the planet who saw that movie,
    eh.

    Jeff

    No way, eh! R-radiation has made me an enemy of civilization!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.