UK and Europe · Public discussion

SMIDSY Explanation

Started by Tony Raven · · Last activity · 71 posts · 1,824 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
27 October 2004
Last activity
10 November 2004
Original author
Tony Raven
Posts
71
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,824
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 71
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3723080.stm

    A third of UK drivers could be breaking the law and putting themselves
    and others at risk because of poor eye sight, research finds.
    A Royal National Institute for the Blind survey suggests as many as
    13m drivers do not have regular eye tests and are unaware of changes
    in vision.

    Basic eyesight tests on people who did not wear glasses revealed 65%
    of those who failed were drivers.

    One in three of those who failed said they were not surprised.

    They admitted that they had suspicions that their sight was not
    perfect.

    The findings, based on research by Warwick University, contained in a
    report called The Road Ahead.

    They suggest tham many people are putting themselves at risk not only
    of accidents, but also of prosecution, as driving with uncorrected
    vision is an offence and can carry a fine of up to £1,000, three
    penalty points and possible disqualification.

    <rest of article snipped>

  2. Tony Raven said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3723080.stm

    A third of UK drivers could be breaking the law and putting themselves
    and others at risk because of poor eye sight, research finds.
    A Royal National Institute for the Blind survey suggests as many as
    13m drivers do not have regular eye tests and are unaware of changes
    in vision.

    Basic eyesight tests on people who did not wear glasses revealed 65%
    of those who failed were drivers.

    One in three of those who failed said they were not surprised.

    Doesn't surprise me either. Wouldn't this be easily solved
    by requiring an eye test (optician's certificate) in order
    to renew insurance or road tax?

    Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    --
    jc

    Remove the -not from email

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jeremy Collins said:
    Tony Raven said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3723080.stm

    A third of UK drivers could be breaking the law and putting themselves
    and others at risk because of poor eye sight, research finds.
    A Royal National Institute for the Blind survey suggests as many as
    13m drivers do not have regular eye tests and are unaware of changes
    in vision.

    Basic eyesight tests on people who did not wear glasses revealed 65%
    of those who failed were drivers.

    One in three of those who failed said they were not surprised.

    Doesn't surprise me either. Wouldn't this be easily solved
    by requiring an eye test (optician's certificate) in order
    to renew insurance or road tax?

    Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    Well, personally I'd like to see a more American system* where you have
    to renew your driving license regularly. An eye test could be included
    in this.

    *Not often I say that.

    Ian
    --
    My email address is invalid to prevent spam.
    Real contact details are on my website at http://www.drianwalker.com

  4. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A third of UK drivers could be breaking the law and putting themselves
    and others at risk because of poor eye sight, research finds.
    A Royal National Institute for the Blind survey suggests as many as
    13m drivers do not have regular eye tests and are unaware of changes
    in vision.

    Basic eyesight tests on people who did not wear glasses revealed 65%
    of those who failed were drivers.

    And the remaining 35% were cyclists and/or pedestrians - a possible case of
    contributary negligence in any incident involving collisions with cars
    driven by drivers with defective vision :-)

    And like many of the comments here - Everything I say is fully substantiated
    by my own opinion :-)

    Vernon in Leeds

  5. Jeremy Collins said:


    Tony Raven said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3723080.stm

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Basic eyesight tests on people who did not wear glasses revealed 65%
    of those who failed were drivers.

    One in three of those who failed said they were not surprised.

    Doesn't surprise me either. Wouldn't this be easily solved
    by requiring an eye test (optician's certificate) in order
    to renew insurance or road tax?

    Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    Not out of my taxes thank you.

    John B

  6. "JohnB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    Not out of my taxes thank you.

    Strange - I always thought you were more left wing than that (or is there a
    missing :-)?)

    Eye tests used to be free - I thought this was a good thing, in the
    interests of preventative medicine.

    (mine are :-( )

    cheers,
    clive


  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    ASDA charge a tenner.

  8. Clive George said:


    "JohnB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    Not out of my taxes thank you.

    Strange - I always thought you were more left wing than that (or is there a
    missing :-)?)

    Nothing missing I'm afraid.
    I would object to contributing towards eye tests that were specifically
    for allowing a person to drive.
    I could foresee insurance companies touting "free eye tests for drivers"
    then claiming the cost back from the taxpayer should the driver give
    them their custom.

    Quoted message said:

    Eye tests used to be free - I thought this was a good thing, in the
    interests of preventative medicine.

    Of course.

    Quoted message said:

    (mine are :-( )

    Reminds me I must make an appointment.

    John B

  9. Ian Walker said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jeremy Collins said:
    Tony Raven said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3723080.stm

    A third of UK drivers could be breaking the law and putting themselves
    and others at risk because of poor eye sight, research finds.
    A Royal National Institute for the Blind survey suggests as many as
    13m drivers do not have regular eye tests and are unaware of changes
    in vision.

    Basic eyesight tests on people who did not wear glasses revealed 65%
    of those who failed were drivers.

    One in three of those who failed said they were not surprised.

    Doesn't surprise me either. Wouldn't this be easily solved
    by requiring an eye test (optician's certificate) in order
    to renew insurance or road tax?

    Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    Well, personally I'd like to see a more American system* where you have
    to renew your driving license regularly. An eye test could be included
    in this.

    *Not often I say that.

    Wash your mouth out with soap. You could have said Australian system,
    20 years ago it was annual but I think you can now get 5 year licenses
    for 150 dollars odd, about 60 quid.

    They also apparently have much more draconian penalties for losing it,
    if you lose (misplace, not forfiet) your license, you have to do a
    written test, and if you fail that you have to do a full driving test
    again, so I'm led to believe my my father in outlaw. Having said that,
    it wouldn't be the first time he's talked bollox, though ;-)

    --
    Trevor Barton

  10. "JohnB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Clive George said:


    "JohnB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    > Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    > sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    Not out of my taxes thank you.

    Strange - I always thought you were more left wing than that (or is


    there a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    missing :-)?)

    Nothing missing I'm afraid.
    I would object to contributing towards eye tests that were specifically
    for allowing a person to drive.

    Ah, that explains it - I was thinking more of a return to the old free eye
    tests for all.

    cheers,
    clive

  11. In Germany your license states if you have to wear glasses or contacts to
    drive. You are also required to carry a spare set of glasses with you. If
    you are stopped and not wearing a spex/contacts it is then very easy for the
    police to prosecute.

    Regards

    Paul

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 22/10/2004

  12. Tony Raven said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3723080.stm

    A third of UK drivers could be breaking the law and putting themselves
    and others at risk because of poor eye sight, research finds.
    A Royal National Institute for the Blind survey suggests as many as
    13m drivers do not have regular eye tests and are unaware of changes
    in vision.

    Unlikely to be a valid excuse for the chav that nearly got me last
    night. I've seen him around in his kevved-up red Astra before
    though...one day I'll find it parked <evil grin>

  13. In message <[email hidden]>, vernon levy
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Last time I had one, an eye test was about 14 quid; I'm
    sure this could be subsidised or discounted quite heavily.

    ASDA charge a tenner.


    If you are a member of the Local Co-Op here in Leeds then eye tests are
    free (membership costs a minimum of GBP 2)
    --
    Chris French, Leeds

  14. In message <[email hidden]>, Paul F
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    In Germany your license states if you have to wear glasses or contacts to
    drive. You are also required to carry a spare set of glasses with you. If
    you are stopped and not wearing a spex/contacts it is then very easy for the
    police to prosecute.


    But is there any insistence that you have to have an eye test?

    ISTM that the problem isn't so much that people who have glasses don't
    wear them when driving - I think most people who need to wear them
    probably do, and people who have glasses normally get their eyes tested
    regularly.

    People who don't have glasses are the issue here, as the eyesight can
    deteriorate quite a lot without people realising - and even if they do,
    there is then the effort to be made to get a test done etc.
    --
    Chris French, Leeds

  15. Paul F said:

    In Germany your license states if you have to wear glasses or contacts to
    drive. You are also required to carry a spare set of glasses with you. If
    you are stopped and not wearing a spex/contacts it is then very easy for the
    police to prosecute.

    Is it a voluntary declaration though?

    --
    jc

    Remove the -not from email

  16. "Jeremy Collins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul F said:

    In Germany your license states if you have to wear glasses or contacts to
    drive. You are also required to carry a spare set of glasses with you.
    If you are stopped and not wearing a spex/contacts it is then very easy
    for the police to prosecute.

    Is it a voluntary declaration though?

    --
    jc

    No it's not voluntary (at least I believe it isn't). You have to have a
    valid eye exam certificate to re-new your bi-annual license.

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.782 / Virus Database: 528 - Release Date: 22/10/2004

  17. Ian Walker said:

    Well, personally I'd like to see a more American system* where you have
    to renew your driving license regularly. An eye test could be included
    in this.

    *Not often I say that.

    Ian

    In most US states, renewing one's license consists of paying a nominal fee
    to the state Motor Vehicle Department,and getting a new photo taken. I don't
    recall my driving skills, knowledge or vision being tested at any time when
    I renewed my license. If one's license expires without being renewed, it is
    usually necessary to repeat the whole testing process to get a new license.
    There is a movement afoot to require very old drivers to at least have their
    vision tested in order to retain their licenses.
    --
    mark

  18. "Paul F" wrote

    Quoted message said:

    In Germany your license states if you have to wear glasses or contacts to
    drive. You are also required to carry a spare set of glasses with you. If
    you are stopped and not wearing a spex/contacts it is then very easy for


    the

    Quoted message said:

    police to prosecute.

    Regards

    Paul


    US licenses also state whether one must wear contacts/glasses in order to
    drive. Kind of a moot point in my case, I'm not entirely sure I could find
    my car w/o my glasses on!
    --
    mark

  19. "Jeremy Collins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul F said:

    In Germany your license states if you have to wear glasses or contacts


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    drive. You are also required to carry a spare set of glasses with you.


    If

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you are stopped and not wearing a spex/contacts it is then very easy for


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    police to prosecute.

    Is it a voluntary declaration though?

    --
    jc

    Remove the -not from email

  20. Now with added reply goodness...

    "Nathaniel Porter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jeremy Collins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul F said:

    In Germany your license states if you have to wear glasses or contacts


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    drive. You are also required to carry a spare set of glasses with


    you.

    Quoted message said:

    If

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you are stopped and not wearing a spex/contacts it is then very easy


    for

    Quoted message said:

    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    police to prosecute.

    Is it a voluntary declaration though?

    On my photocard licence (which I'm 99.9% certain is standardised across the
    EU), there is an "Information codes" sections. The code "01", if present,
    indicates that the licence holder requires eyesight correction.

    IIRC you have to declare if you need eyesight correction on your driving
    licence application, and it is also noted on your test pass certificate.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.