Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

SMH Cycling Article

Started by maurice · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,701 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
16 April 2003
Last activity
19 April 2003
Original author
maurice
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,701
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. anyone noticed the article contained in the comment section of today's SMH (page 17) that is highly critical of cyclists using sydney roads. According to the article cyclists on sydney roads are reaching plague proportions, represent a road hazard, contribute nothing to road funding (like cyclists also don't own cars), hog the road, ignore the law, etc, etc. what a crock and yet another expample of the aggressive attitude sydney cyclists have to put up with in this motor city. link attached:
    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/04/15/1050172595996.html 😠

  2. Quoted post said:

    Posted by maurice
    anyone noticed the article contained in the comment section of today's SMH (page 17) that is highly critical of cyclists using Sydney roads. According to the article cyclists on Sydney roads are reaching plague proportions, represent a road hazard, contribute nothing to road funding (like cyclists also don't own cars), hog the road, ignore the law, etc, etc. what a crock and yet another expample of the aggressive attitude sydney cyclists have to put up with in this motor city.

    I would suggest that the Sydney & suburbs cyclists band together and politely email the SMH,to inform them that their article is false and misleading.

    Here is their 'contact' link.

    www.smh.com.au/contacts/index.html

  3. Yeah. I read it. I wouldn't take it too seriously. I think that it was intended to be ironic.

  4. "Neil Dall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yeah. I read it. I wouldn't take it too seriously. I think that it was intended to be ironic.

    ironic or moronic?

    my mid is made up.

    I love how the middle aged cyclist is termed a hazard - claims of no tests, licences or rego
    fees, yet it was the old fellar in the Falcon that failed to look and opens the door infront of
    the cyclist

  5. MPD said:


    "Neil Dall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yeah. I read it. I wouldn't take it too seriously. I think that it was intended to be ironic.

    ironic or moronic?

    my mid is made up.

    Now all you need to do is work on your uppers and lowers. 🙂

    ---
    Cheers

    PeterC

    [Rushing headlong: out of control - and there ain't no stopping]
    [and there's nothing you can do about it at all]

  6. I'm middle aged, don't drive, and ride along Birrell Street regularly.
    I feel for the poor bloke on the bike. Very close..

    Driver's should read from the article the reasoning behind riding well out into the lane..to avoid opening doors and to be more easily seen. And there are a lot of dedicated commuters who ride regardless of the weather.

    A bit of a lightweight, worthless article really.

    Regards.

  7. One of the letters referred to a $59 insurance fee. Is this some insurance you can get from Cycling Australia or is it part of the race licence????

    Yours in low revolutions

    LLL

  8. For more info on this insurance, have a look at:
    bicyclensw.org.aumodules.php

    It's insurance for everyone, not just for roadies.

    GW

    Quoted message said:

    From: Lesley Leadlegs <[email hidden]> Organization:
    [email hidden] Newsgroups: aus.bicycle Date: 19 Apr 2003 09:00:11 +0950 Subject:
    Re: SMH Cycling Article

    One of the letters referred to a $59 insurance fee. Is this some insurance you can get from
    Cycling Australia or is it part of the race licence????

    Yours in low revolutions

    LLL

    --

    Quoted message said:

    --------------------------<


    Posted via cyclingforums.com cyclingforums.comcyclingforums.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.