Singletrack

Quoted message said:

Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given away to
one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get added to the
newsletter mailing list.

Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll do it.

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws

Ride-A-Lot said:

Quoted message said:

Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given away to
one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get added to the
newsletter mailing list.

Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll do it.

I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Shawn said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

Quoted message said:

Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given away to
one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get added to the
newsletter mailing list.

Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll do
it.

I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws

Ride-A-Lot said:

Shawn said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

[email hidden] wrote:

>
> Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given
> away to one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get
> added to the newsletter mailing list.

Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll
do it.

I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

Not if you're Mark Foley.

Bill Sornson said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

Shawn said:

Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> [email hidden] wrote:
>
>> Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given
>> away to one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get
>> added to the newsletter mailing list.
>
> Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll
> do it.
I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

Not if you're Mark Foley.

There you go bringing politics into it again.

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws

"Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

Shawn said:

Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> [email hidden] wrote:
>
>>
>> Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given
>> away to one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get
>> added to the newsletter mailing list.
>
>
> Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll
> do it.

I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

Not if you're Mark Foley.

Chatting online during a vote. Classic. And I thought my work habits were
bad.

Greg

Ride-A-Lot said:

Bill Sornson said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

Shawn wrote:
> Ride-A-Lot wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Not if you're Mark Foley.

Quoted message said:

There you go bringing politics into it again.

More like current events.

Bill Sornson said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

Shawn said:

Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> [email hidden] wrote:
>
>> Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given
>> away to one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get
>> added to the newsletter mailing list.
>
> Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll
> do it.
I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

Not if you're Mark Foley.

Damn, dude.

You see Conan last night? Ouch . . it's so bad, it's hard for me to
laugh about it. Which is saying a lot, since my 'bad taste' button
barely works.

Bill Sornson said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

Shawn said:

Ride-A-Lot wrote:

>[email hidden] wrote:
>
>
>>Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given
>>away to one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get
>>added to the newsletter mailing list.
>
>
>Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll
>do it.

I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

Not if you're Mark Foley.

Mitch said "female".

G.T. said:

"Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

Shawn wrote:

>Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>
>>[email hidden] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given
>>>away to one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get
>>>added to the newsletter mailing list.
>>
>>
>>Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll
>>do it.
>
>I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)
>
>Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

Not if you're Mark Foley.

Chatting online during a vote. Classic. And I thought my work habits were
bad.

methinks he pretty much took
the cake with that one . . .

"Ride-A-Lot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Shawn said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

[email hidden] wrote:

>
> Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given away to
> one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get added to the
> newsletter mailing list.

Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll do
it.

I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

There's also the "respect" element.

small change said:

"Ride-A-Lot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Shawn said:

Ride-A-Lot wrote:
> [email hidden] wrote:
>
>> Also, a years subscription to Mountain Biking UK is being given away to
>> one licker newsletter subscriber, so make sure you get added to the
>> newsletter mailing list.
>
> Well if it's a cute female I get to lick for the subscription, I'll do
> it.
I assume Mrs. RAL doesn't read AM-B. ;-)

Shawn

Ah, but saying and doing are two different things. 😉

There's also the "respect" element.

Yes. I respect that fact that she respects I can make a joke. There's
also an element of trust involved as well. Remember, I'm living the
bachelor life out here right now (at least for a couple more months).
If I was a disgusting, scum sucking, low-life cheater I'd have a very
easy time of it.

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws

Ride-A-Lot said:

If
I was a disgusting, scum sucking, low-life cheater I'd have a very easy
time of it.

Wow, quite the ladies man, eh?

I don't think it's a respect issue, just a
tackiness issue.

pete fagerlin said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

If I was a disgusting, scum sucking, low-life cheater I'd have a very
easy time of it.

Wow, quite the ladies man, eh?

I don't think it's a respect issue, just a tackiness issue.

I think tacky understates the gravity of it.

cc said:

pete fagerlin said:

Ride-A-Lot said:

If I was a disgusting, scum sucking, low-life cheater I'd have a very
easy time of it.

Wow, quite the ladies man, eh?

I don't think it's a respect issue, just a tackiness issue.

I think tacky understates the gravity of it.

I don't seem to see the harm here. Oh well.

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws

"Ride-A-Lot" <mitchell@[NOSPAM]schnauzers.ws> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

cc said:

pete fagerlin said:

Ride-A-Lot wrote:

> If I was a disgusting, scum sucking, low-life cheater I'd have a very
> easy time of it.

Wow, quite the ladies man, eh?

I don't think it's a respect issue, just a tackiness issue.

I think tacky understates the gravity of it.

I don't seem to see the harm here. Oh well.

I'll spell it out. Discussing drooling over chicks that are not your wife,
and what you would like to do them, a) without her present and b) in
public, is real pig behavior imsho. It's only second to doing the same when
your wife is present. It shows a profound lack of respect for any value of
intimacy or desire for your SO. If I were your spouse I'd be embarassed and
be embarassed for you. It's bad behavior, and implies you do not value or
respect your wife or your marriage.
You didn't ask to have it spelled out but there ya go anyway.

ps

"Ride-A-Lot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

small change said:

"Ride-A-Lot" <mitchell@[NOSPAM]schnauzers.ws> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

cc wrote:
> pete fagerlin wrote:
>> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>>
>>> If I was a disgusting, scum sucking, low-life cheater I'd have a very
>>> easy time of it.
>> Wow, quite the ladies man, eh?
>>
>> I don't think it's a respect issue, just a tackiness issue.
> I think tacky understates the gravity of it.
I don't seem to see the harm here. Oh well.

I'll spell it out. Discussing drooling over chicks that are not your
wife, and what you would like to do them, a) without her present and b)
in public, is real pig behavior imsho. It's only second to doing the
same when your wife is present. It shows a profound lack of respect for
any value of intimacy or desire for your SO. If I were your spouse I'd be
embarassed and be embarassed for you. It's bad behavior, and implies
you do not value or respect your wife or your marriage.
You didn't ask to have it spelled out but there ya go anyway.

ps

I am sorry. It was a joke.

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws

You are a joke.

small change said:

"Ride-A-Lot" <mitchell@[NOSPAM]schnauzers.ws> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

cc said:

pete fagerlin wrote:
> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>
>> If I was a disgusting, scum sucking, low-life cheater I'd have a very
>> easy time of it.
> Wow, quite the ladies man, eh?
>
> I don't think it's a respect issue, just a tackiness issue.
I think tacky understates the gravity of it.

I don't seem to see the harm here. Oh well.

I'll spell it out. Discussing drooling over chicks that are not your wife,
and what you would like to do them, a) without her present and b) in
public, is real pig behavior imsho. It's only second to doing the same when
your wife is present. It shows a profound lack of respect for any value of
intimacy or desire for your SO. If I were your spouse I'd be embarassed and
be embarassed for you. It's bad behavior, and implies you do not value or
respect your wife or your marriage.
You didn't ask to have it spelled out but there ya go anyway.

ps

I am sorry. It was a joke.

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws

Tom Carson said:

"Ride-A-Lot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

small change said:

"Ride-A-Lot" <mitchell@[NOSPAM]schnauzers.ws> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> cc wrote:
>> pete fagerlin wrote:
>>> Ride-A-Lot wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I was a disgusting, scum sucking, low-life cheater I'd have a very
>>>> easy time of it.
>>> Wow, quite the ladies man, eh?
>>>
>>> I don't think it's a respect issue, just a tackiness issue.
>> I think tacky understates the gravity of it.
> I don't seem to see the harm here. Oh well.
>
I'll spell it out. Discussing drooling over chicks that are not your
wife, and what you would like to do them, a) without her present and b)
in public, is real pig behavior imsho. It's only second to doing the
same when your wife is present. It shows a profound lack of respect for
any value of intimacy or desire for your SO. If I were your spouse I'd be
embarassed and be embarassed for you. It's bad behavior, and implies
you do not value or respect your wife or your marriage.
You didn't ask to have it spelled out but there ya go anyway.

ps

I am sorry. It was a joke.

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws

You are a joke.

Really, Bob? How nice.

--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws