Paul Rudin said:I've just ordered one of these:
<http://www.edinburghbicycle.com/ebwPNLqrymode.a4p?f%5FProductID=9453&f%5FFullProductVersion=1&f%5FSupersetQRY=C416&f%5FSortOrderID=1&f%5Fbct=>
(assuming that 'orrible url works :/)
I'm not expecting anything very wonderful at that price, but it should
be light and low maintenance for zipping around town.
If I get the hang of riding fixed do I really need the rear brake? Or
should I just leave it on in case I want to use the freewheel at some
point?
The URL works for me. Looks like a nicely specced bike for the price.
I ride a Pearson Touche with fixed on both sides (yet to flip is over to
the larger sprocket) and have both front & rear brakes. depending on how
I want to ride downhill, I either let the bike go and spin like crazy
and need the brakes to control the speed/stop at the bottom before the
lights or I do a controlled descent using the pedals only. One way I
/need/ both brakes, the other I don't /need/ any. I suppose it depends
on where you ride and how you ride it. If you intend to use the
freewheel then you will have to put the brake back on, it is not an
overhead to leave it on when riding fixed.
The fixie I am building on the other hand, will not have a rear brake as
the frame is only designed to allow for roller brakes & I was not able
to find a suitable hub that allows both.
--
Don Whybrow
Sequi Bonum Non Time
"Lord, please make me the kind of person my dog thinks I am."