UK and Europe Β· Public discussion

Singlespeed, good for training or not?

Started by Coyoteboy Β· Β· Last activity Β· 20 posts Β· 420 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
10 April 2007
Last activity
11 April 2007
Original author
Coyoteboy
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
420
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ive been running the full sus (28lb XC, no bob) as a commuter, but chatting
    on here recently I got ridiculed for running a full sus on road πŸ™‚ So, not
    having a road bike, I thought I might build up my old rigid super-light
    frame and throw on some old kit i have, maybe make it a single speed on the
    rear and just have a 44/34 front end. Will the lack of gears aid my training
    for a decent long distance (for me, 54miles) at >17.5mph or damage it? My
    training is ~18 miles of up 'n' down (goes 4 or 5 times from ~100ft to 250ft
    each direction, with flat sections between).

    It will also be good to have the full sus build up for offroad instead of
    with slicks which need changing each time.

    Thoughts....?

  2. "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> a Γ©crit:

    Quoted message said:

    So, not having a road bike, I thought I might build up my old
    rigid super-light frame and throw on some old kit i have, maybe
    make it a single speed on the rear and just have a 44/34 front
    end. Will the lack of gears aid my training for a decent long
    distance (for me, 54miles) at >17.5mph or damage it? My training is ~18
    miles of up 'n' down (goes 4 or 5 times from
    ~100ft to 250ft each direction, with flat sections between).

    You'll certainly work harder on the hills on a singlespeed, and you'll also
    have to spin faster on the flats. My experience is that it's a good way to
    improve general fitness.

    I'm not so sure about your 2-speed idea, at least not as you suggest it. One
    of the attractions of a singlespeed is its mechanical simplicity. Assuming
    you'll need a chain tensioner of some sort, if you really want a 2-speed,
    why not dispense with the front derailleur and keep two sprockets at the
    back?

    James Thomson

  3. "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ive been running the full sus (28lb XC, no bob) as a commuter, but
    chatting on here recently I got ridiculed for running a full sus on road
    πŸ™‚ So, not having a road bike, I thought I might build up my old rigid
    super-light frame and throw on some old kit i have, maybe make it a single
    speed on the rear and just have a 44/34 front end. Will the lack of gears
    aid my training for a decent long distance (for me, 54miles) at >17.5mph
    or damage it? My training is ~18 miles of up 'n' down (goes 4 or 5 times
    from ~100ft to 250ft each direction, with flat sections between).

    It will also be good to have the full sus build up for offroad instead of
    with slicks which need changing each time.

    Thoughts....?

    I like singlespeeds (but prefer fixies).
    Off road singlespeeds seem to be 32/16, on road single speeds seem to come
    out about 48 by 18/17/16.
    Depending how long/steep your hills are, one of the above ratios should be
    OK.

    Can't really see the logic of a 34/44 front. How you going to shift it?

    Peter

  4. Coyoteboy said:

    Ive been running the full sus (28lb XC, no bob) as a commuter, but chatting
    on here recently I got ridiculed for running a full sus on road πŸ™‚ So, not
    having a road bike, I thought I might build up my old rigid super-light
    frame and throw on some old kit i have, maybe make it a single speed on the
    rear and just have a 44/34 front end. Will the lack of gears aid my training
    for a decent long distance (for me, 54miles) at >17.5mph or damage it? My
    training is ~18 miles of up 'n' down (goes 4 or 5 times from ~100ft to 250ft
    each direction, with flat sections between).

    It will also be good to have the full sus build up for offroad instead of
    with slicks which need changing each time.

    Thoughts....?

    I've been riding two 68" fixies over the winter; approx 4000km since
    November. I am *definitely* stronger now - both on the flat, and up
    hills, which is saying a lot given that I live in Norfolk.

    I've even been audaxing on the Pompino a few times.

    Not sure about Singlespeed though... it still leaves you open to the
    temptations of girlie freewheeling... πŸ˜‰


  5. Quoted message said:


    I've been riding two 68" fixies over the winter; approx 4000km since
    November. I am *definitely* stronger now - both on the flat, and up
    hills, which is saying a lot given that I live in Norfolk.

    I've even been audaxing on the Pompino a few times.

    Not sure about Singlespeed though... it still leaves you open to the
    temptations of girlie freewheeling... πŸ˜‰

    I've been on a fixed since October and have really taken to it, legs
    feel a lot stronger and overall the bike just feels more like an
    extension of the limbs in a way that I never quite got on a
    freewheel. I'm going to do a triathlon on the fixie in a couple of
    weeks, it may slow the time down a little but I'm not too bothered,
    it's worth it.

    The geared freewheel only ever sees the road now when the fixie's in
    the shop or off the road for mods, and I always notice these things:

    I never change gears even though they're there, just don't feel the
    need.
    Hardly ever stop pedaling, even when the pawls disengage.
    It's a horrible sensation whenever the freewheel kicks in - yuck.

    How about a flip-flop hub with a freewheel one side and fixed cog the
    other? Y

  6. James Thomson proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not so sure about your 2-speed idea, at least not as you suggest it.
    One of the attractions of a singlespeed is its mechanical simplicity.
    Assuming you'll need a chain tensioner of some sort, if you really want a
    2-speed, why not dispense with the front derailleur and keep two sprockets
    at the back?

    James Thomson

    The two front was purely for when I cry and cant get up the last hill to
    work! I was going to maintain the front mech and lock the rear in one
    position, removing the rear cogs either side of ideal.

    --
    J
    __________________________________________
    http://www.jbuckle.homeip.net << My personal site
    http://www.aoskc.com << Ainsdale Kitesurf Club

  7. peter-potato proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    I like singlespeeds (but prefer fixies).
    Off road singlespeeds seem to be 32/16, on road single speeds seem to come
    out about 48 by 18/17/16.

    I generally run 44/15 on the way in to work, and shift a couple either way
    at most. I'd never use it offroad - im not that fit πŸ™‚

    Quoted message said:

    Can't really see the logic of a 34/44 front. How you going to shift it?

    Keep the front mech, using the 34 purely as a "run home to mommy, i cant
    make it up the hill" gear.

    --
    J
    __________________________________________
    http://www.jbuckle.homeip.net << My personal site
    http://www.aoskc.com << Ainsdale Kitesurf Club

  8. Duncan Smith proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    The geared freewheel only ever sees the road now when the fixie's in
    the shop or off the road for mods, and I always notice these things:

    I never change gears even though they're there, just don't feel the
    need.
    Hardly ever stop pedaling, even when the pawls disengage.
    It's a horrible sensation whenever the freewheel kicks in - yuck.

    How about a flip-flop hub with a freewheel one side and fixed cog the
    other? Y

    I dont think I'm hardcore enough for fixed wheel, i think i might actually
    die. Certainly with heavy traffic too?

    --
    J
    __________________________________________
    http://www.jbuckle.homeip.net << My personal site
    http://www.aoskc.com << Ainsdale Kitesurf Club

  9. Coyoteboy said:

    The two front was purely for when I cry and cant get up the last hill to
    work! I was going to maintain the front mech and lock the rear in one
    position, removing the rear cogs either side of ideal.

    If you're going to do this, do it properly!

    If you can't make it up the hill, you can force yourself to go a bit further
    every day before you get off and push. Then you've got some of your
    training covered as well! You'll be surprised what you can get up in a
    given gear once you no longer have the choice to change down.

    Anthony

  10. "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> a Γ©crit:

    Quoted message said:

    The two front was purely for when I cry and cant get up the last
    hill to work! I was going to maintain the front mech and lock the
    rear in one position, removing the rear cogs either side of ideal.

    I realise that. My point is that if you really want two gears, as you'll be
    keeping the rear derailleur anyway to tension the chain you may as well run
    two sprockets at the rear. That would let you dispense with the front
    shifter, front derailleur, and two chainrings.

    James Thomson

  11. "Coyoteboy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Duncan Smith proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    The geared freewheel only ever sees the road now when the fixie's in
    the shop or off the road for mods, and I always notice these things:

    I never change gears even though they're there, just don't feel the
    need.
    Hardly ever stop pedaling, even when the pawls disengage.
    It's a horrible sensation whenever the freewheel kicks in - yuck.

    How about a flip-flop hub with a freewheel one side and fixed cog the
    other? Y

    I dont think I'm hardcore enough for fixed wheel, i think i might actually
    die. Certainly with heavy traffic too?

    Oh go on...you'll love it...it's why god invented kneecaps.

    Has the frame got vertical or horizontal drop-outs?
    Peter

  12. Coyoteboy said:

    Duncan Smith proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    The geared freewheel only ever sees the road now when the fixie's in
    the shop or off the road for mods, and I always notice these things:

    Quoted message said:

    I never change gears even though they're there, just don't feel the
    need.
    Hardly ever stop pedaling, even when the pawls disengage.
    It's a horrible sensation whenever the freewheel kicks in - yuck.

    Quoted message said:

    How about a flip-flop hub with a freewheel one side and fixed cog the
    other? Y

    I dont think I'm hardcore enough for fixed wheel, i think i might actually
    die. Certainly with heavy traffic too?

    Not a bit of it, stick to quiet roads for the first couple of days -
    it won't be a problem. Never as bad as you think..

    Regards,

    Duncan.

  13. peter-potato proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    Oh go on...you'll love it...it's why god invented kneecaps.

    Has the frame got vertical or horizontal drop-outs?
    Peter

    πŸ™‚ Vertical unfortunately, but I can knock up a tensioner from an old rear
    mech no problem, have done that already on my trials bike.

    --
    J
    __________________________________________
    http://www.jbuckle.homeip.net << My personal site
    http://www.aoskc.com << Ainsdale Kitesurf Club

  14. In article said:

    peter-potato proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    Oh go on...you'll love it...it's why god invented kneecaps.

    Has the frame got vertical or horizontal drop-outs?
    Peter

    πŸ™‚ Vertical unfortunately, but I can knock up a tensioner from an old rear
    mech no problem, have done that already on my trials bike.

    But if you want to go fixed, not just single, you will need to keep the
    chain taut while slowing down too (or even while pedalling backwards
    for a trackstand). Allegedly it's possible to do this with two chain
    tensioners, one on the top chain run and one on the bottom, or if you are
    lucky enough with your lengths and cog choices that a tensioner isn't
    really needed much.

  15. "Alan Braggins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    In article said:

    peter-potato proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    Oh go on...you'll love it...it's why god invented kneecaps.

    Has the frame got vertical or horizontal drop-outs?
    Peter

    πŸ™‚ Vertical unfortunately, but I can knock up a tensioner from an old rear
    mech no problem, have done that already on my trials bike.

    But if you want to go fixed, not just single, you will need to keep the
    chain taut while slowing down too (or even while pedalling backwards
    for a trackstand). Allegedly it's possible to do this with two chain
    tensioners, one on the top chain run and one on the bottom, or if you are
    lucky enough with your lengths and cog choices that a tensioner isn't
    really needed much.

    Or a phantom sprocket (which I've never seen...).
    I be interested to see someone using two chain tensioners on a fixie!
    Peter

  16. "peter-potato" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But if you want to go fixed, not just single, you will need to keep the
    chain taut while slowing down too (or even while pedalling backwards
    for a trackstand). Allegedly it's possible to do this with two chain
    tensioners, one on the top chain run and one on the bottom, or if you are
    lucky enough with your lengths and cog choices that a tensioner isn't
    really needed much.

    Or a phantom sprocket (which I've never seen...).
    I be interested to see someone using two chain tensioners on a fixie!

    I think it would be a bit [censored] :-( One of the great things about a fixie is
    the directness of the drive - introduce a lag with chain tensioners, and
    although the chain won't fall off, it just won't be the same. (this assumes
    the tensioners are sprung ones - non-sprung could work, but would be [censored]
    for different reasons, not least because the forces involved are quite
    high).

    cheers,
    clive

  17. In article said:


    "Alan Braggins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    In article said:

    peter-potato proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    > Oh go on...you'll love it...it's why god invented kneecaps.
    >
    > Has the frame got vertical or horizontal drop-outs?
    > Peter

    πŸ™‚ Vertical unfortunately, but I can knock up a tensioner from an old rear
    mech no problem, have done that already on my trials bike.

    But if you want to go fixed, not just single, you will need to keep the
    chain taut while slowing down too (or even while pedalling backwards
    for a trackstand). Allegedly it's possible to do this with two chain
    tensioners, one on the top chain run and one on the bottom, or if you are
    lucky enough with your lengths and cog choices that a tensioner isn't
    really needed much.

    Or a phantom sprocket (which I've never seen...).

    I've seen photos of tandem sync trains being done like that:
    http://sheldonbrown.com/tandem-build2.html#okeefe
    but Sheldon points out here that trying to do it on a fixed gear
    would mean losing the drive side chainstay:
    http://cyclingforums.com/archive/index.php/t-69240-p-2.html

    But http://fixiefaqs.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome#Q2.18
    implies it's possible on some setups.

    Quoted message said:

    I be interested to see someone using two chain tensioners on a fixie!

    Googling, maybe I imagined that. Certainly you would have to be very
    careful (just using a derailleur wouldn't work, it's got to allow the
    chain to go completely taut in reverse).

    On the other hand I'll swear I have seen photos of a "fixed" conversion
    which actually used two chains, one on each side, with one freewheel
    acting normally and one in reverse (being a normal freewheel on the
    wrong side, not a left-drive freewheel), and I can't find that now
    either.

  18. Alan Braggins said:

    On the other hand I'll swear I have seen photos of a "fixed" conversion
    which actually used two chains, one on each side, with one freewheel
    acting normally and one in reverse (being a normal freewheel on the
    wrong side, not a left-drive freewheel), and I can't find that now
    either.

    http://www.fixedgeargallery.com/2005/mar/TheBikeCo-op.htm

    Anthony

  19. Coyoteboy said:

    Thoughts....?

    I'm a 16 stone fat b*****d in a general state of un-fitness. I've been
    riding an on-one pompino (with freewheel) since the middle of last
    year. The past few months I've started using it more frequently for
    commuting to work (up to 3 times a week now.) The journey is about 22
    miles (11.5 miles in, 10.5 miles out, Tayport to St Andrews, I vary my
    route slightly.) I'd say it has done wonders for my strength and
    fitness and also made me quicker (though still slow by anybody else's
    standards.) I've also found it much more fun than a multi-geared bike
    as I either have to work or walk. On my geared bike I dropped down to
    the granny gear on the slightest incline and it took ages to get
    anywhere.

  20. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I dont think I'm hardcore enough for fixed wheel, i think i might
    actually die. Certainly with heavy traffic too?

    Quoted message said:

    Not a bit of it, stick to quiet roads for the first couple of days -
    it won't be a problem. Never as bad as you think..

    True. Let's face it, fixed is for people so stupid that they can only ride
    in circles on bikes with no brakes. A normal person will have no problems.
    πŸ˜‰

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users Β· 0 guests Β·0 bots Β·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.