UK and Europe · Public discussion

Single Pannier - which side?

Started by Ian · · Last activity · 22 posts · 659 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
22 June 2005
Last activity
23 June 2005
Original author
Ian
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
659
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    Ian.

  2. "Ian" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be quite
    dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it be
    mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    Dunno about that but I put mine on the right hand side to make me look
    bigger.

    If you're getting heavy enough to worry about such things, I'd instinctively
    say the non-drive side. But it would really have to be very heavy...

    cheers,
    clive

  3. Ian said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    The outside.

    Failing that, the other side.

    ...d

  4. Ian said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    I use the RH side because mounting one on the left pushes my pump into
    the spokes. For two-pannier use I have a smaller pump which goes inside
    one of them.

  5. "Ian" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be quite
    dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it be
    mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    As mentioned by others, I use the RHS. Makes cars think you're a little
    bigger. In fact, when my RHS pannier broke, I moved to the LHS. It felt
    totally unnatural 🙂

  6. Ian said:

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should
    it be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    I don't think the pannier is going to break any spokes, so I put it on
    the side on which I put a foot down, for me the left. This means that the
    weight in the pannier is not trying to tip me over when I've got just one
    foot down. When my left knee is playing up (touch wood, not for over two
    years now), I put the right foot down and place the load on the bike to
    the right.

    Mike

  7. "Ian" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?


    an equally minimal amount of though suggests that the differential loading
    is insignificant and notthing to lose sleep over :-)

  8. Ian wrote:

    So which side should it

    Quoted message said:

    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    For me , depends which bike. My touring size rear panniers live apart
    most of the time. LH pannier on the tandem while the commuter bike has
    the RH pannier.
    As the commuter gets most use and I want the bike to look BIG on the
    side cars pass as per the Theory of Big.
    Iain

    http://www.bikereader.com/contributors/misc/big.html


  9. Quoted message said:


    http://www.bikereader.com/contributors/misc/big.html

    "Imminent Road Kill"

    ROTFLMFAO! Priceless... ;p

    Thanks for that Iain.

  10. Ian of said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    Mine goes on the right, but for the practical reason that I have just the
    right pannier of a pair of Ortliebs. The other one got stolen, with
    attached bike.
    --
    I can stand brute force, but brute reason is quite unbearable.
    There is something unfair about its use. It is hitting below the intellect.
    Oscar Wilde
    Steph Peters delete invalid from [email hidden]
    Tatting, lace & stitching page <http://www.sandbenders.demon.co.uk/index.htm>

  11. Ian said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    If you're using a single pannier than the load will be, basically,
    nothing that's going to upset any sort of decent bike (if it's a biggy
    then split it or carry directly on the rack for the sake of easier balance).

    So use whichever one you've picked up, if they're asymmetrical.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  12. On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:42:11 +0100, Ian <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    I've never worried about wheel loading with a single pannier. If I
    just need one, it usually goes on the right. My (limited) thinking
    is that cars might give me a couple extra inches when overtaking,
    and it encourages me to lean my bike against something on the non-
    derialleur side.

    --
    jc

  13. I tended to use the left pannier. When wheeling the bike I was usually
    on its left side and would lean bike against a wall etc on its right.
    Having the pannier on the left meant I could load/unload without
    disturbing bike & lock.

    --
    Helen D. Vecht: [email hidden]
    Edgware.

  14. I concur with the consensus (if there is one....), i.e. it doesn't
    make much difference which side. I used to debate about this one but
    now don't bother. I generally go for the "even pannier wear" approach
    and use either pretty randomly. I've carried some pretty heavy loads
    in a single pannier (like last night for example) and I'm always
    surprised at what little difference it makes to the balance of the
    bike.

    Andy

  15. To reply to my own post. Is URCs David Martin the same David Martin who
    wrote Theory of Big?

  16. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    To reply to my own post. Is URCs David Martin the same David Martin who
    wrote Theory of Big?

    LOL! What on earth is "Theory of Big?!"

  17. C.J.Patten said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    To reply to my own post. Is URCs David Martin the same David Martin who
    wrote Theory of Big?

    LOL! What on earth is "Theory of Big?!"

    <http://www.martin-family.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/BIG.html>

    --
    Dave...

  18. "dkahn400" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    C.J.Patten said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    To reply to my own post. Is URCs David Martin the same David Martin who
    wrote Theory of Big?

    LOL! What on earth is "Theory of Big?!"

    <http://www.martin-family.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/BIG.html>

    AH. I HAD seen that but the article title didn't click.
    Great reading... ride naked if you want to be seen. 😉

  19. Ian said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    It clearly needs to be put on the left side to counterbalance the
    weight of the derailleurs, cogs, rings, and chain. ;-)

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3

  20. vernon levy said:

    "Ian" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Something I have been pondering (but not too much, cos that would be
    quite dull).

    Common sense suggests that when using a single pannier some sort of
    unbalanced load will be put on the rear wheel. So which side should it
    be mounted on to reduce the likelihood of spoke breakages etc?

    an equally minimal amount of though suggests that the differential loading
    is insignificant and notthing to lose sleep over :-)


    Thanks to all for the replies...thankfully no sleep was being lost, it
    was just one of those "I wonder" moments.

    Next week's topic....if my daily commute follows a circular route should
    I turns the tyres around every so often to even out wear on the left and
    righ hand sides? ;-)

    Ian

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.