I like the look of a pair of Shimano M038 shoes in my LBS.
A question on the sizing - I normally take size 42, my faitful Lake cycling shoes are 42 1/2. The Shimano seems to fit at size 43. The size 42 ones seem very tight around the toes.
Anyone else found Shimao sizes to be on the small side?
I like the look of a pair of Shimano M038 shoes in my LBS.
I've just bought a pair of them. Not used much yet, but I like them so far.
Quoted message said:
A question on the sizing - I normally take size 42, my faitful Lake cycling shoes are 42 1/2. The Shimano seems to fit at size 43. The size 42 ones seem very tight around the toes.
Anyone else found Shimao sizes to be on the small side?
Yup, and the bloke at the LBS said the same thing, so it's not just us. I normally wear a 45, but I bought the M038 in a 46.
-- Keith Willoughby flat222.orgkeithOpen ↗ "Suspected murderer of Tupac murder suspect murdered"
Anyone else found Shimao sizes to be on the small side?
I find their shoes very narrow (relative to my feet, at least), to the extent that anything wide enough for me is oversize in terms of the number but also too long. My SD-60 sandals, where there isn't an upper to constrict me, are my usual size 43, I just can't use their shoes as they're the wrong shape for me.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] dundee.ac.uk~pjclinchOpen ↗
"John Hearns" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I like the look of a pair of Shimano M038 shoes in my LBS.
A question on the sizing - I normally take size 42, my faitful Lake cycling shoes are 42 1/2. The Shimano seems to fit at size 43. The size 42 ones seem very tight around the toes.
Anyone else found Shimao sizes to be on the small side?
My usual shoe size is 43. I've got size 45 Shimano cycling shoes and although very long, they're still a bit tight widthways after an hour or too. I'm seriously thinking of cutting the elastic strip that goes over the instep (but under the velcro fastened flap).
I think the problem is that theory says that for efficient power transfer the shoe should not move!
My lace up trainer style Cannondales are wider but at six years old are disintegrating (and I can't find replacements).
I would dearly like to find a casual looking cycling shoe that's also wide.
I would dearly like to find a casual looking cycling shoe that's also wide.
Quoted message said:
Tried Specialized rockhoppers?
That's what I use, and I find Shimano too narrow. Worth a try, at any rate.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch University of Dundee Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] dundee.ac.uk~pjclinchOpen ↗
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:36:00 +0100, John Hearns <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I like the look of a pair of Shimano M038 shoes in my LBS.
A question on the sizing - I normally take size 42, my faitful Lake cycling shoes are 42 1/2. The Shimano seems to fit at size 43. The size 42 ones seem very tight around the toes.
Anyone else found Shimao sizes to be on the small side?
Hi John
Shimano shoes are indeed narrow for they size.
Is this groups full of mutants, I wonder. Size 43, size 43? I take size 10 shoes but had to move up to size 11 for my Shimano M036s (I think that's the model number. They're on my feet at the moment so I cannot actually see the size info.)
I suppose the shoes could always double as flippers.
Anyone else found Shimao sizes to be on the small side?
Quoted message said:
Is this groups full of mutants, I wonder. Size 43, size 43? I take size 10 shoes but had to move up to size 11 for my Shimano M036s
I suppose the shoes could always double as flippers.
Shoes: size 44 EEW Teva's: UK size 10 Shimano sandals: size 47-48. Rather difficult to find overshoes. Still a better fit than any cycling shoe I've ever tried.
I agree with Peter, the size isn't too bad, but the width is far too
narrow
Quoted message said:
... perhaps they don't model their designs on European feet ... 😉
Quoted message said:
I'm not convinced they model their designs on *human* feet.
Maybe they should just market them as women's models. I rather like their width 🙂
Roos - European female human
But the sizes appropriate to women are also narrow compared to other womens' shoes. I take a size 38 in shoes and usually only 37 in sandals, but had to get 39-40 in the Shimano sandals to get a comfy fit. My feet look rather lost in them as there's a lot of sandal in front of the toes and behind the heels.
Steph Also European female human, but with wider feet than Roos