Road Cycling · Public discussion

signalling an un-obvious turn

Started by Claire · · Last activity · 10 posts · 470 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
16 December 2005
Last activity
19 December 2005
Original author
Claire
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
470
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There are a couple of intersections I negotiate regularly that have the
    following set-up. The road I am on is a two-way road up until the
    intersection. The way in front of me is a freeway off-ramp, one
    direction, facing me. There is two-way cross traffic. Along the left
    side of the off-ramp is the start of or continuation of a non-motorized
    facility, either a short cut-through or a multi-use path.

    For those locals reading this, these are at
    o the I-90 trail continuation at North Mercer Way and Island Crest Way,
    eastbound
    o entering the I-90 trailhead at Factoria Blvd, westbound
    o NE 28th cut-through at 84th, next to the Hunts Point off-ramp of SR
    -520, westbound

    The first two are fully signalized intersections, the last is a
    four-way stop. If I were a motor vehicle, my only choice would be to
    turn left or right. What I'm doing as a bicycle is doing a sort of
    veering to the left, and then going straight. Probably somewhere
    between 60 - 98% of the motorists, depending on the intersection, have
    no clear idea where I'm headed or what I'm doing.

    The way I'm handling it now is to get in the left-hand turn lane,
    signal for a left, and wait for the left hand turn light or my turn.
    When the light turns green, or it's my turn to go at the four-way, I
    roll forward and while rolling, point to the trail or cut-through
    entrance, and get on.

    Do you think the pointing only adds to the confusion? Better ideas of
    how to handle these? None of these intersections warrent a dismount
    with pedestrian-like behavior.

    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky
    Personal page: http://www.geocities.com/cpetersky/
    See the books I've set free at:
    http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky

  2. Claire said:

    ...

    The way I'm handling it now is to get in the left-hand turn lane,
    signal for a left, and wait for the left hand turn light or my turn.
    When the light turns green, or it's my turn to go at the four-way, I
    roll forward and while rolling, point to the trail or cut-through
    entrance, and get on.

    Do you think the pointing only adds to the confusion? Better ideas of
    how to handle these? None of these intersections warrent a dismount
    with pedestrian-like behavior.

    I don't see how pointing would add to the confusion. I'm a fan of
    creative signaling. But the downside to it is, if you need to do an
    emergency maneuver, one of your hands is in the wrong place.

    Which motorists are you worried about? Would it be the "head on"
    motorists? (It wasn't clear to me, but then I'm not sure I'm
    visualizing things precisely.) Have they acted confused in the past?

    Pardon my saying so, but this sounds like yet another little hassle
    caused by separate facilities. They're just so hard to integrate into
    the road network. Even when well done, you get these quirks.

    - Frank Krygowski

  3. Claire said:

    There are a couple of intersections I negotiate regularly that have the
    following set-up. The road I am on is a two-way road up until the
    intersection. The way in front of me is a freeway off-ramp, one direction,
    facing me. There is two-way cross traffic. Along the left side of the
    off-ramp is the start of or continuation of a non-motorized facility,
    either a short cut-through or a multi-use path.

    Quoted message said:

    What I'm doing as a bicycle is doing a sort of veering to the left,
    and then going straight. Probably somewhere between 60 - 98% of the
    motorists, depending on the intersection, have no clear idea where I'm
    headed or what I'm doing.

    Quoted message said:

    The way I'm handling it now is to get in the left-hand turn lane, signal
    for a left, and wait for the left hand turn light or my turn. When the
    light turns green, or it's my turn to go at the four-way, I roll forward
    and while rolling, point to the trail or cut-through entrance, and get on.

    Quoted message said:

    Do you think the pointing only adds to the confusion? Better ideas of how
    to handle these? None of these intersections warrent a dismount with
    pedestrian-like behavior.

    I think you're doing the right thing. I'd probably do the same, if I felt
    I needed to clarify where I was headed.

    Can you pretty much continue through, or do you have to slow suddenly to
    enter the trail? If not, there's probably no danger anyway, so it doesn't
    matter.

    Matt O.

  4. Quoted message said:

    Pardon my saying so, but this sounds like yet another little hassle
    caused by separate facilities. They're just so hard to integrate into
    the road network. Even when well done, you get these quirks.

    You're pardoned.

    But you'd like two of these three, honestly, if they were a regular
    part of your commute, as they are for me. The connection from Factoria
    Blvd is not possible to do any other way but by bike trail or
    expressway. Any route on city streets would take you vastly out of the
    way.

    And the cut-through at 520 is brilliant, brilliant I tell you. I
    remember when someone first showed me where it was -- I was awestruck
    at how nifty it was.The neighborhood wouldn't stand for it being
    available to cars, but it's such a convenience for those on foot or
    bike.

    The one to get on the trail at Island Crest Way -- well, there's a
    roadway that's somewhat less direct, but flatter, so it's a fine
    alternative to the trail. When it's a hot summer's day, I'll often take
    the leafier, shadier, quieter road, if I have the extra time.

    Warm Regards,

    Claire

  5. "Claire" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Do you think the pointing only adds to the confusion? Better ideas of
    how to handle these? None of these intersections warrent a dismount
    with pedestrian-like behavior.

    I use pointing.

  6. Claire said:

    Do you think the pointing only adds to the confusion? Better ideas of
    how to handle these? None of these intersections warrent a dismount
    with pedestrian-like behavior.

    I do the same thing sometimes--point to where I am going and wonder if
    anybody even knows why the hell I did that.

    I would be biased toward the right side of the turn lane, to facilitate
    the turn-off. The only thing I might add is that this seems like a
    situation where a little creative extra-legal activity could be of
    great assistance. This would depend primarily on the sight lines left,
    right, and forward. Let's say you're cruising toward the intersection
    and can clearly see that no pedestrians are present and no vehicles are
    approaching from any direction, but you've got a red light. You could
    sneak through and be on your way, never have to worry about
    coordinating with any random motorists.

    Robert

  7. "Claire" wrote: (clip) I roll forward and while rolling, point to the trail
    or cut-through entrance, and get on.(clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I recall, some time back, a description of this, or similar intersection, in
    which another complication was discussed. In that case, there is a
    pedestrian walkway parallel to the cross street, which you would cross to
    get onto the multi-use trail. This adds the complication, that you are
    pressing to cross the street quickly, and it might be possible to strike a
    pedestrian who doesn't expect a vehicle to shoot in from that direction.
    Does that apply here?

  8. Quoted message said:

    The only thing I might add is that this seems like a
    situation where a little creative extra-legal activity could be of
    great assistance. This would depend primarily on the sight lines left,
    right, and forward. Let's say you're cruising toward the intersection
    and can clearly see that no pedestrians are present and no vehicles are
    approaching from any direction, but you've got a red light. You could
    sneak through and be on your way, never have to worry about
    coordinating with any random motorists.

    Other than the fact that I am generally a Good Girl, and obey stop
    signs and signals...at least at the intersection with Factoria Blvd,
    the traffic volumes are 16,600 cars daily on the street I'd be on to
    enter the trail, 40,300 on the cross street (from: City of Bellevue
    Transportation Department, 2004 Annual Weekday Traffic). That's A LOT
    of cars. I don't think I've ever been at the intersection and it has
    been empty. I led a solstice ride through there one year, and even
    though we came through the intersection after midnight, and there was
    still plenty of traffic.

    The traffic cam is here: http://www.cityofbellevue.org/trafficcam/, and
    you can click on the one on Factoria Blvd to give you a view of how
    many cars are coming down the road even as you read this.

    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky

  9. On 15 Dec 2005 17:28:46 -0800, "Claire" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    ....

    Quoted message said:


    The way I'm handling it now is to get in the left-hand turn lane,
    signal for a left, and wait for the left hand turn light or my turn.
    When the light turns green, or it's my turn to go at the four-way, I
    roll forward and while rolling, point to the trail or cut-through
    entrance, and get on.

    Do you think the pointing only adds to the confusion? Better ideas of
    how to handle these? None of these intersections warrent a dismount
    with pedestrian-like behavior.

    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky

    I think the pointing, coupled with eye contact with opposing driver is
    about the best you can do.

    I sometimes ride a very congested high traffic area with many drivers
    needing to turn right at most intersections. I ride on the very wide
    shoulder until approaching a red light, when I take a spot in the
    vehicle line. I communicate my merge with a direct point where I'm
    heading while watching the driver approaching the space. Riding my
    Tour Easy recumbent makes driver-rider eye contact easy.

    Indiana Mike

  10. Leo Lichtman said:


    "Claire" wrote: (clip) I roll forward and while rolling, point to the trail
    or cut-through entrance, and get on.(clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I recall, some time back, a description of this, or similar intersection, in
    which another complication was discussed. In that case, there is a
    pedestrian walkway parallel to the cross street, which you would cross to
    get onto the multi-use trail. This adds the complication, that you are
    pressing to cross the street quickly, and it might be possible to strike a
    pedestrian who doesn't expect a vehicle to shoot in from that direction.
    Does that apply here?

    Yes, there is also the additional hazard of pedestrians. Usually they
    have no idea you're about to ride right up onto the sidewalk at them.
    I haven't had nearly the problem with them as with people taking a
    right turn from the freeway offramp personally.

    --
    Dane Buson - z u v e m b i @ u n i x b i g o t s . o r g
    "Death is never prevented... just postponed"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.