Should I try to avoid riding in areas with a lot of construction and roadwork and no bike infrastructure?

[Spoke]

Considering the obvious risks and hazards associated with construction and roadwork zones, its surprising that many cyclists still choose to ride through these areas despite the lack of bike infrastructure. The data suggests that cyclists are more likely to be involved in accidents or near-misses when navigating through construction zones, and yet some cyclists seem to be willing to take on this added risk.

Given the well-established principles of traffic management and road safety, shouldnt cyclists be prioritizing routes that have dedicated bike lanes or alternative infrastructure, rather than taking a gamble on roads with limited or no bike infrastructure?

Isnt it reasonable to assume that cyclists who choose to ride through construction zones without adequate bike infrastructure are, in effect, choosing to compromise their own safety and the safety of other road users?

Shouldnt local authorities be doing more to provide alternative routes or temporary infrastructure for cyclists during periods of construction, rather than leaving it to individual cyclists to make their own risk assessments?

Are there any real benefits to riding through construction zones that outweigh the obvious risks, or is this simply a case of cyclists being unwilling to adapt their routes or riding styles to accommodate the changing road environment?

 

[xeus]

Riding through construction zones can be risky, but it's not always by choice. Cyclists may face long detours or lack of alternative routes, leading to inconvenience and added travel time. However, safety should always be a priority. If possible, cyclists can plan their routes ahead, using navigation apps that account for construction zones and bike lanes. Authorities, too, have a role to play by providing temporary infrastructure and proper signage to ensure cyclist safety. It's a shared responsibility to create a bike-friendly environment. #Cycling #RoadSafety