I'm curious what everybody thinks about bikers wearing clothing that promotes alternative transportation. Obviously our backs are much larger than a car's bumper sticker, so we should be that much more effective.
Is it a distraction to the motorist? Is it better to avoid the potential confrontations, because the cars are bigger? Or is it cool? What are your thoughts?
"oilfreeandhappy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I'm curious what everybody thinks about bikers wearing clothing that promotes alternative transportation. Obviously our backs are much larger than a car's bumper sticker, so we should be that much more effective.
Is it a distraction to the motorist? Is it better to avoid the potential confrontations, because the cars are bigger? Or is it cool? What are your thoughts?
First, I think you are in the wrong newsgroup.
Apart from that fact, I think wearing clothing to promote anything is stupid. I don't put bumper stickers on my car and I preferr not to make lame "statements" with my clothing. There are much better methods to voice political opinions. Write a letter to your local paper or something. It strikes me that it's more about making you feel good about your "statement" then any real effort to communicate.
I'm curious what everybody thinks about bikers wearing clothing that promotes alternative transportation. Obviously our backs are much larger than a car's bumper sticker, so we should be that much more effective.
Is it a distraction to the motorist? Is it better to avoid the potential confrontations, because the cars are bigger? Or is it cool? What are your thoughts?
I wear clothing that is comfortable, affordable, and appropriate for the activity I am doing. I don't care if it says suck oil and drive an Excursion as long as it does what it is intended to do. People who want to save the world will do so regardless of what slogan you or anyone else puts on their clothing.
"Ride-A-Lot" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
oilfreeandhappy said:
I'm curious what everybody thinks about bikers wearing clothing that promotes alternative transportation. Obviously our backs are much larger than a car's bumper sticker, so we should be that much more effective.
Is it a distraction to the motorist? Is it better to avoid the potential confrontations, because the cars are bigger? Or is it cool? What are your thoughts?
I wear clothing that is comfortable, affordable, and appropriate for the activity I am doing. I don't care if it says suck oil and drive an Excursion as long as it does what it is intended to do. People who want to save the world will do so regardless of what slogan you or anyone else puts on their clothing.
Well, in that vein, why don't we all just keep quiet and avoid expressing ourselves altogether? I always thought discourse was overrated . . .
I'm curious what everybody thinks about bikers wearing clothing that promotes alternative transportation. Obviously our backs are much larger than a car's bumper sticker, so we should be that much more effective.
Is it a distraction to the motorist? Is it better to avoid the potential confrontations, because the cars are bigger? Or is it cool? What are your thoughts?
My thoughts are that you're looking for a rationalization/excuse to spam newsgroups with your lame, overpriced patches and t-shirts some more and you should stop it.
I'm curious what everybody thinks about bikers wearing clothing that promotes alternative transportation. Obviously our backs are much larger than a car's bumper sticker, so we should be that much more effective.
Is it a distraction to the motorist? Is it better to avoid the potential confrontations, because the cars are bigger? Or is it cool? What are your thoughts?
Heh! No one would see it....I've usually got a hydration pack or backpack on.
Besides, if they're close enough to read it, they are close enough to hit you when they are talking on their cell phone, drinking coffee, reading the paper, putting on make-up or otherwise not paying attention at the wheel
I'm curious what everybody thinks about bikers wearing clothing that promotes alternative transportation. Obviously our backs are much larger than a car's bumper sticker, so we should be that much more effective.
Is it a distraction to the motorist? Is it better to avoid the potential confrontations, because the cars are bigger? Or is it cool? What are your thoughts?
I don't need to "spam" a newsgroup to sell my products. I have them displayed prominently in bike shops. I put no URL on this post. It is good to get opinions from newsgroups though, as that's something I don't get much from the bikeshops.
Of course, I got no such opinion from your response, only a slam.
Is it a distraction to the motorist? Is it better to avoid the potential confrontations, because the cars are bigger? Or is it cool? What are your thoughts?
Having been treasurer of a 1,200-member civic association for seven years; I can tell you with some certainty that out of every 1,000 people, at least five of them are stone crazy at any given moment. Yes, probably 2 of them are paranoid schizos or stage n Alzheimer's... but the other three are different people on different days.
Some of the people you encounter (or encounter you...) on the road are not going to be rational at that particular moment and, as stated, cars really are bigger.... in fact they can kill or maim you with the flick of a wrist and beat the rap by telling the cops that you were weaving. Been there seen it done...
So my bottom line is: don't do *anything* to agitate strangers. "The Man In The Gray Flannel Suit" and all that... -- PeteCresswell
Well, in that vein, why don't we all just keep quiet and avoid expressing ourselves altogether? I always thought discourse was overrated . . .
Discourse with total strangers can be perceived as rude/offensive and can be extremely dangerous. Like-it-or-not we live in a cosmopolitan world where different groups have radically different ideas of what constitutes acceptable behavior. Go to Hawaii sometime and try flipping the bird to somebody in traffic - you'll see... and never do it again (if you survive the resulting encounter....). -- PeteCresswell
Well, in that vein, why don't we all just keep quiet and avoid expressing ourselves altogether? I always thought discourse was overrated . . .
Discourse with total strangers can be perceived as rude/offensive and can be extremely dangerous. Like-it-or-not we live in a cosmopolitan world where different groups have radically different ideas of what constitutes acceptable behavior. Go to Hawaii sometime and try flipping the bird to somebody in traffic - you'll see... and never do it again (if you survive the resulting encounter....).
This is one extreme. My point is simply that to avoid the meeting of different opinions - and hence the sharing of different ideas - altogether is a coward's way of dealing with the fact that conflicting viewpoints do exist. Without understanding we are doomed to perpetual ignorance.
Well, in that vein, why don't we all just keep quiet and avoid expressing ourselves altogether? I always thought discourse was overrated . . .
Discourse with total strangers can be perceived as rude/offensive and can be extremely dangerous. Like-it-or-not we live in a cosmopolitan world where different groups have radically different ideas of what constitutes acceptable behavior. Go to Hawaii sometime and try flipping the bird to somebody in traffic - you'll see... and never do it again (if you survive the resulting encounter....).
I noticed that while out there. What is that all about (I didn't do it myself). The guy who received the finger pursued the other individual for four miles, honking, screaming, and actually trying to pass him on a two lane city street. I don't know what happened when they both turned onto another street.
This is one extreme. My point is simply that to avoid the meeting of different opinions - and hence the sharing of different ideas - altogether is a coward's way of dealing with the fact that conflicting viewpoints do exist. Without understanding we are doomed to perpetual ignorance.
Not in the context of some 45-year old woman being able to kill or maim you with a flick of her wrist - and not having to answer for it. Don't underestimate the potential for something like this. -- PeteCresswell
Not in the context of some 45-year old woman being able to kill or maim you with a flick of her wrist - and not having to answer for it. Don't underestimate the potential for something like this.
I'm not by any means. I'm just saying that - while your practical example may be a judicious case of restraint and respect - that philosophy is one to be applied carefully.
This is one extreme. My point is simply that to avoid the meeting of different opinions - and hence the sharing of different ideas - altogether is a coward's way of dealing with the fact that conflicting viewpoints do exist. Without understanding we are doomed to perpetual ignorance.
Ah, but ignorance is bliss.
That's an interesting paradox. Kind of like "youth is wasted on the young"
To make a gross oversimplification: to people over there, you, I, and everybody we normally associate with are a bunch of limp-wristed, cowardly, screaming [censored] who have no concept whatsoever of proper behavior.
The guy who was being pursued got his ass kicked and his vehicle damaged. -- PeteCresswell