Does the length of the legs (leverage) determine ones climbing potential, even if heart/lungs are in good condition?
Cycling Training · Public discussion
short legs= poor climbing potential?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Training
- Published
- 13 January 2005
- Last activity
- 19 January 2005
- Original author
- sam218
- Posts
- 8
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 2,373
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
sam218 said:
Does the length of the legs (leverage) determine ones climbing potential, even if heart/lungs are in good condition?
it doesn't make any difference whatsoever, as your legs don't act as levers. nor does crank length (just get the cranks that feel comfy).
ric
-
Thanks Ric! There goes my excuse!
-
Damn! Mine too (excuse). Should a shorter-legged person get cranks to compensate?
-
Yes, If you've been riding without a crank, getting one will improve your climbing... 😉
-
Here's an interesting bit among Tom Compton's Analytic Cycling pages analyzing the physics of force application during a pedal revolution. You can play with the various components of the model which include, among others, thigh length and shin length to see how force (and therefore power) generation is affected.
http://www.analyticcycling.com/PedalModel_Page.html
My personal experience (as a short (5'6"😉 cyclist, amateur triathlete) is that there are people far taller than I whom I can climb better than and vice versa. I don't think height is a major factor. What you may lose in bone length, you may gain in being lighter or having less leg mass to move around, etc.
Ric - one question for you. You unequivocally ruled out height (and therefore the length of leg bones) as a climbing performance predictor. I remember reading an article that said Lance is a "natural climber" partially because of his "very long" thigh bones. Is this an oversimplification on the part of the author/media?
Berend
-
climbing-geek-> long legs, light (so long legs in compr. with body length).
I'm 1.81, 90cm inner leg, 58kg in the summer 😎
-
marlon1 said:
climbing-geek-> long legs, light (so long legs in compr. with body length).
I'm 1.81, 90cm inner leg, 58kg in the summer 😎
Think about it though, a larger gear requires more power to move at the same cadence. Weither that larger gear is because of gearing, or because of longer legs, shorter/longer cranks... so basically you can make up for your legs and cranks by using different gears.
*agrees with ric* go for comfort
although, if you have a bike that has the same gearing as someone with longer legs and the same crank length as them, wouldn't your absolute maximum speed be lesser than the longer legged person?
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.