gds said:OK, I agree that what works is what's best for the individual. I also
find it interesting that you set up the bar height based on comfort in
the drops. I find the drops and the tops to be the least used positions
with most riding done on the hoods. Thus I've always worked to get the
fit best for that position and let the tops and drops take care of
themselves.
I think the drops are a special case, because they're *at* (or even
beyond) the limit for most people. In other words, a significant number
of riders end up on bikes where the drops are too uncomffortable to
use, either because they require too much of a pelvic bend or because
they can't raise their heads enough to see. So they don't get used at
all, begging the question "why didn't you buy a flat-bar bike?"
You can adjust the location of the hoods to some extent, either by
moving the levers up or down on the bar or changing the stem length,
after the drops are positioned at the appropriate height. It's
interesting to notice how, amongst racers, as the average bar height
seems to have gone down in recent years, the lever location has crept
up until their hoods are actually higher than the tops. I don't think
they even care about being able to brake while in the drops.
I spend most of my time on the hoods, too, and my tops are only about
1" below saddle height. I want to be able to ride for extended periods
in the drops (the prevailing winds are almost always in my face on the
ride home in the evening), but I want to be able to brake and I want to
be able to see the rush hour traffic.
RichC