Shaving Legs

Waxing! Definitely waxing. Ooooooo!! It hurts, but the results are much better, longer lasting and each time you do it the regrowth is a little thinner. I think that's because so many hairs are pulled out by the folicles.

Reasons include; it feels damn nice, it look's good (so I'm told) and after a 120km ride the much needed massage afterward is so much better and easier.

after trimmiing the leg hairs down last week i waxed on the weekend ..... Much better......at least
no pain while my wife spread the goo & bearable pain while removing hair unlike before with long
hair ..& the result...hmmmmmmmm Not bad actually I think i like this no hair look & yes it is silky
smooth...........gotta find a masseur now for that grinding C grade 30min race...blond 18 & big
[censored].....🙂

Cheers BernardG

"Paul J" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Waxing! Definitely waxing. Ooooooo!! It hurts, but the results are much better, longer lasting and
each time you do it the regrowth is a little thinner. I think that's because so many hairs are
pulled out by the folicles.

Reasons include; it feels damn nice, it look's good (so I'm told) and after a 120km ride the much
needed massage afterward is so much better and easier.

--

Quoted message said:

--------------------------<

Posted via cyclingforums.com cyclingforums.comcyclingforums.comOpen ↗

one advantage I found in waxing was not for my legs but for my hair surround le derrière. This
eliminated chaffe and boils that I previously entertained. I guess if I rode more I would wax the
legs again, however I endured a few curious looks from certain laymen in public.

"BernardG" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

after trimmiing the leg hairs down last week i waxed on the weekend ..... Much better......at
least no pain while my wife spread the goo & bearable pain while removing hair unlike before with
long hair ..& the result...hmmmmmmmm Not bad actually I think i like this no hair look & yes it is
silky smooth...........gotta find a masseur now for that grinding C grade 30min race...blond 18 &
big [censored].....🙂

Cheers BernardG

"Paul J" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Waxing! Definitely waxing. Ooooooo!! It hurts, but the results are much better, longer lasting
and each time you do it the regrowth is a little thinner. I think that's because so many hairs
are pulled out by the folicles.

Reasons include; it feels damn nice, it look's good (so I'm told) and after a 120km ride the
much needed massage afterward is so much better and easier.

--

Quoted message said:

--------------------------<

Posted via cyclingforums.com cyclingforums.comcyclingforums.comOpen ↗

"Jake" <j@com> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

one advantage I found in waxing was not for my legs but for my hair

surround

Quoted message said:

le derrière. This eliminated chaffe and boils that I previously

entertained.

Quoted message said:

I guess if I rode more I would wax the legs again, however I endured a few curious looks from
certain laymen in public.

So where did you get waxed exactly, and did it hurt a lot more than the legs?

Please don't be shy - as a hairy bear considering some serious deforestation, I would like some
detail on this touchy subject.

Tim

Uhm, I did all the waxing myself. I couldn't fathom the idea of someone else doing it, even a
girlfriend. I'm probably not that hairy, so a hairy bear may need to think otherwise.

The waxed sheets applied to skin are tedious to apply around the bum. I discovered getting the wax
on my fingers and using the traction to zip off the hair clump by clump. I didn't find it very
painful because the pain is short lived and predicatable. But thats subjective.

Results lasted for about two months.

I've found even with waring nicks, that the hair around the bum crack is constantly being rubbed and
tugging the skin, ending with very sore bits of flesh. I'm guessing the wax process is the only
effective method because the actually roots need to be removed to stop ingrowns.

"Tim Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Jake" <j@com> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

one advantage I found in waxing was not for my legs but for my hair

surround

Quoted message said:

le derrière. This eliminated chaffe and boils that I previously

entertained.

Quoted message said:

I guess if I rode more I would wax the legs again, however I endured a

few

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

curious looks from certain laymen in public.

So where did you get waxed exactly, and did it hurt a lot more than the legs?

Please don't be shy - as a hairy bear considering some serious deforestation, I would like some
detail on this touchy subject.

Tim

"Jake" <j@com> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Uhm, I did all the waxing myself. I couldn't fathom the idea of someone

else

Quoted message said:

doing it, even a girlfriend. I'm probably not that hairy, so a hairy bear may need to think
otherwise.

The waxed sheets applied to skin are tedious to apply around the bum. I discovered getting the wax
on my fingers and using the traction to zip off the hair clump by clump. I didn't find it very
painful because the pain is short lived and predicatable. But thats subjective.

Results lasted for about two months.

I've found even with waring nicks, that the hair around the bum crack is constantly being rubbed
and tugging the skin, ending with very sore bits

of

Quoted message said:

flesh. I'm guessing the wax process is the only effective method because the actually roots need
to be removed to stop ingrowns.

Thanks very much Jake!

Much appreciated - this isn't the sort of stuff you can get info on readily ;-)

Tim