Urs Freuler and Pino are out. Looks like the team is beginning to wash its hands of the past and hope it can have future getting wiild crad berths in the big classics and TDF.
While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.
While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.
Concur there. Even if exonerated, his career is over. As seen by UCI's denying Phonak a license citing their questionning of the new tests rather than staying a decision pending the Hamilton and Perez decisions, UCI has made it clear it does not take kindly to anyone questioning their authority. UCI feels if Tyler was innocent, he should have fessed up like a man and taken a suspension like the other cheats.
"meb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
BIKE BUM said:
....
While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.
Concur there. Even if exonerated, his career is over. As seen by UCI's denying Phonak a license citing their questionning of the new tests rather than staying a decision pending the Hamilton and Perez decisions, UCI has made it clear it does not take kindly to anyone questioning their authority. UCI feels if Tyler was innocent, he should have fessed up like a man and taken a suspension like the other cheats.
-- meb
RE your last sentence:
Just one question: what if he truely is innocent ?
( I admit I have my own views on Tyler, but still, my opinion is just an opinion, and if one is truely innocent then what do you do ?
Just one question: what if he truely is innocent ?
( I admit I have my own views on Tyler, but still, my opinion is just
an
Quoted message said:
opinion, and if one is truely innocent then what do you do ?
Dumbass -
It's a billion to one that he's innocent (the odds of him being false positived AND his roomate being false positived AND no one else being false positived).
What do you do? Nothing. He's not getting the electric chair for godssake - he's getting a 2 year UCI ban. Most of us have a de-facto lifetime ban from the UCI due to a lack of talent, commitment, or both. K. Gringioni.
"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Laz said:
RE your last sentence:
Just one question: what if he truely is innocent ?
( I admit I have my own views on Tyler, but still, my opinion is just an opinion, and if one is truely innocent then what do you do ?
Dumbass -
It's a billion to one that he's innocent (the odds of him being false positived AND his roomate being false positived AND no one else being false positived).
Don't you mean "and NO ONE ELSE" testing positive at all. For some reason that doesn't seem to have impacted anyone.
WHY were ONLY two members of the same team found positive for something that people are swearing was widespread?
Wasn't there some warning that this new test was coming though? Maybe they all switched to a newer version of epo or to transfusions of their own blood???
Wasn't there some warning that this new test was coming though? Maybe they all switched to a newer version of epo or to transfusions of their own blood???
It was announced to the riders during the TDF that this test would be initiated in the Olympics. That short interval likely would preclude anyone who was using homologous transfusions at the TDF from having their blood clean by the time of the Olympics, although someone who might have transfused slightly earlier might misjudge the interval time needed subsequent the transfusion, especially since it is not apparent what percent foreign blood the lab would select for a positive test conclusion.
"meb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
BIKE BUM said:
....
While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.
Concur there. Even if exonerated, his career is over. As seen by UCI's denying Phonak a license citing their questionning of the new tests rather than staying a decision pending the Hamilton and Perez decisions, UCI has made it clear it does not take kindly to anyone questioning their authority. UCI feels if Tyler was innocent, he should have fessed up like a man and taken a suspension like the other cheats.
-- meb
RE your last sentence:
Just one question: what if he truely is innocent ?
( I admit I have my own views on Tyler, but still, my opinion is just an opinion, and if one is truely innocent then what do you do ?
What do want, procedural due process from the Czars at UCI?
The UCI/WADA contention is the test reliably catches cheaters not innocents, therefore it would NEVER come to that. When the authority has such a slam dunk of a piece of evidence, innocents should not make waves like Vasseur did as it undermines the credibility of UCI. After all, Vasseur served about half his suspension anyway, so what’s one more year if it helps keep UCI’s clean house front? How are they going to scare cyclist into compliance if their tests are shown flawed?
"BIKE BUM" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Urs Freuler and Pino are out. Looks like the team is beginning to wash its hands of the past and hope it can have future getting wiild crad berths in the big classics and TDF.
While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.
As I understood van VRT text, they do not yet have a DS. Currently, Johan Capiot is looking for a job. Phonak should ask him to work for them.
Don't you mean "and NO ONE ELSE" testing positive at all. For some reason that doesn't seem to have impacted anyone. WHY were ONLY two members of the same team found positive for something that people are swearing was widespread?
How about that the lab in Greece had thought Tyler was innocent until they were told that they didn't know how to read the results. There is a quote in the latest VeloNews regarding this.