Road Cycling · Public discussion

Shake-up At Phonak

Started by BIKE BUM · · Last activity · 12 posts · 559 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
3 January 2005
Last activity
6 January 2005
Original author
BIKE BUM
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
559
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Urs Freuler and Pino are out. Looks like the team is beginning to wash
    its hands of the past and hope it can have future getting wiild crad
    berths in the big classics and TDF.

    While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a
    suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.

  2. BIKE BUM said:

    ....

    While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a
    suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.

    Concur there. Even if exonerated, his career is over. As seen by UCI's denying Phonak a license citing their questionning of the new tests rather than staying a decision pending the Hamilton and Perez decisions, UCI has made it clear it does not take kindly to anyone questioning their authority. UCI feels if Tyler was innocent, he should have fessed up like a man and taken a suspension like the other cheats.

  3. "meb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    BIKE BUM said:

    ....

    While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a
    suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.

    Concur there. Even if exonerated, his career is over. As seen by
    UCI's denying Phonak a license citing their questionning of the new
    tests rather than staying a decision pending the Hamilton and Perez
    decisions, UCI has made it clear it does not take kindly to anyone
    questioning their authority. UCI feels if Tyler was innocent, he
    should have fessed up like a man and taken a suspension like the other
    cheats.

    --
    meb


    RE your last sentence:

    Just one question: what if he truely is innocent ?

    ( I admit I have my own views on Tyler, but still, my opinion is just an
    opinion, and if one is truely innocent then what do you do ?

  4. Laz said:

    RE your last sentence:

    Just one question: what if he truely is innocent ?

    ( I admit I have my own views on Tyler, but still, my opinion is just


    an

    Quoted message said:

    opinion, and if one is truely innocent then what do you do ?

    Dumbass -

    It's a billion to one that he's innocent (the odds of him being false
    positived AND his roomate being false positived AND no one else being
    false positived).

    What do you do? Nothing. He's not getting the electric chair for
    godssake - he's getting a 2 year UCI ban. Most of us have a de-facto
    lifetime ban from the UCI due to a lack of talent, commitment, or both.
    K. Gringioni.

  5. "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Laz said:

    RE your last sentence:

    Just one question: what if he truely is innocent ?

    ( I admit I have my own views on Tyler, but still, my opinion is just
    an opinion, and if one is truely innocent then what do you do ?

    Dumbass -

    It's a billion to one that he's innocent (the odds of him being false
    positived AND his roomate being false positived AND no one else being
    false positived).

    Don't you mean "and NO ONE ELSE" testing positive at all. For some reason
    that doesn't seem to have impacted anyone.

    WHY were ONLY two members of the same team found positive for something that
    people are swearing was widespread?

  6. Wasn't there some warning that this new test was coming though? Maybe
    they all switched to a newer version of epo or to transfusions of their
    own blood???

  7. Haven't you heard? They've hired a group of sherpa's from Nepal. Their
    trading swiss cheese for blood.

    Jesus guys.

  8. Patricio Carlos said:

    Wasn't there some warning that this new test was coming though? Maybe
    they all switched to a newer version of epo or to transfusions of their
    own blood???

    It was announced to the riders during the TDF that this test would be initiated in the Olympics. That short interval likely would preclude anyone who was using homologous transfusions at the TDF from having their blood clean by the time of the Olympics, although someone who might have transfused slightly earlier might misjudge the interval time needed subsequent the transfusion, especially since it is not apparent what percent foreign blood the lab would select for a positive test conclusion.

  9. Laz said:

    "meb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    BIKE BUM said:

    ....

    While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a
    suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.

    Concur there. Even if exonerated, his career is over. As seen by
    UCI's denying Phonak a license citing their questionning of the new
    tests rather than staying a decision pending the Hamilton and Perez
    decisions, UCI has made it clear it does not take kindly to anyone
    questioning their authority. UCI feels if Tyler was innocent, he
    should have fessed up like a man and taken a suspension like the other
    cheats.

    --
    meb


    RE your last sentence:

    Just one question: what if he truely is innocent ?

    ( I admit I have my own views on Tyler, but still, my opinion is just an
    opinion, and if one is truely innocent then what do you do ?

    What do want, procedural due process from the Czars at UCI?

    The UCI/WADA contention is the test reliably catches cheaters not innocents, therefore it would NEVER come to that. When the authority has such a slam dunk of a piece of evidence, innocents should not make waves like Vasseur did as it undermines the credibility of UCI. After all, Vasseur served about half his suspension anyway, so what’s one more year if it helps keep UCI’s clean house front? How are they going to scare cyclist into compliance if their tests are shown flawed?

    procycling.comnews.aspx

  10. "BIKE BUM" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Urs Freuler and Pino are out. Looks like the team is beginning to wash
    its hands of the past and hope it can have future getting wiild crad
    berths in the big classics and TDF.

    While it does not impact Tyler directly -- If he were to avoid a
    suspension, I question if Phonak would take him back.

    As I understood van VRT text, they do not yet have a DS. Currently, Johan
    Capiot is looking for a job. Phonak should ask him to work for them.

  11. Quoted message said:

    Don't you mean "and NO ONE ELSE" testing positive at all.
    For some reason that doesn't seem to have impacted anyone.
    WHY were ONLY two members of the same team found positive
    for something that people are swearing was widespread?

    How about that the lab in Greece had thought
    Tyler was innocent until they were told that
    they didn't know how to read the results.
    There is a quote in the latest VeloNews
    regarding this.

    Bill

  12. "paul s" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Haven't you heard? They've hired a group of sherpa's from Nepal. Their
    trading swiss cheese for blood.

    Jesus guys.

    Posting of the week.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.