"David Hansen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7096492.stm
is a piece of PR puff about the police using the rather heavy Segway
things in a shopping centre.
As opposed to one of those lightweight 'bike things'? They may be heavy but
they are extremely manoeuvrable to get around things quickly - can a bike
turn on its own axis while being ridden by the average cyclist? As far as
weight is concerned, aside from the effects of inertia, the only other
factor I can think of that's relevant is what damage would it would cause if
it runs over something e.g. a foot. The contact area or footprint of the
tyres is then relevant and although the Segway itself is heavier than the
average bike, once the riders weight is also included, I think the tyres
would be under less stress and cause less impact damage than a comparatively
'stiletto like' skinny bike tyre.
Quoted message said:I wonder what the police would say about someone, including
themselves, using a rather lighter bike to ride round the shopping
centre at up to 12mph?
Probably that it has nowhere near as small a footprint and nowhere near the
controllability or manoeuvrability of a Segway. Also that the public riders
may not have received specialist bike training, all going together to paint
a picture that cycling around the shopping centre would be far more risky -
and they'd be right.
Enthusiasm for cycling won't be gained by knocking other devices that can be
used for personal transport. Bikes have their place but that's not being
ridden through shopping centres IMO.
Paul