On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 22:45:47 +0100, Sue White <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:I'd understood that the top-level domain .invalid (see headers)
is provided expressly for munging addresses.
It is.
Quoted message said:I've never had any complaints about my munging both addresses. Of course
I'd stop doing it if my ISP objected, but I think they're too busy
battling zombies and open relays.
It is not (last time I looked anyway) a condition of Demon's AUP to
use a valid - as in a "read" address. They do require that their
customers do not forge domains that they do not own or do not have
explicit permission to use. (Everyone has permission to use .invalid)
However, Clara's specifically requires either the From: or Reply-to:
to be valid.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
- Stuart Millington ALL HTML e-mail rejected -
- [email hidden] http://w3.z-add.co.uk/ -