General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Seal Beach 10K race report

Started by Eno · · Last activity · 6 posts · 452 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 April 2004
Last activity
5 April 2004
Original author
Eno
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
452
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Well, I didn't get a time PR on my time, but I did get a PR
    of sorts. More below.

    The weather was perfect: a little sun, but not much,
    temperatures in the low to mid 60's. The crowd seemed larger
    this year; people really turn out for this local favorite in
    beautiful Seal Beach, CA. The race seemed very well
    organized, as always, and the finish area, right by the
    beach, was as welcomed as ever. One bad thing: the start
    didn't go as well, since the very first street's width had
    been reduced in half by construction. This made for a very
    rough start, with lots of jossling, which made it difficult
    to settle into a good pace on the 1st mile.

    Anyway, my overall time was 52:12.34, off by 15 sec from my
    previous PR, three weeks ago. Bottom line, I think I went
    out too hard, and since miles 1-3 gave a mild incline, I
    think I left too much there. Here are my splits, compared to
    my previous race, and with HR numbers. See anything unusual?

    | 1 2 3 4 5 6
    6.2
    ~~~~~~~~~~~+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ~~~~~~
    HR | 174 182 184 188 192 194 199 Seal Beach |
    8:52.93 8:49.51 8:13.09 8:11.84 8:18.40 8:17.55
    6:1.02 Prev 10K | 8:46.07* 8:46.07 8:46.07 8:32.34
    8:03.23 7:43.00
    6:2.74
    * 1st 3 miles averaged because I missed the mile markers.

    That's right: my PR was in my HR, the highest I've ever
    recorded for myself in any race or training run. Yauza.

    --
    eNo "Why am I here?"

  2. In article said:

    Anyway, my overall time was 52:12.34, off by 15 sec from
    my previous PR, three weeks ago. Bottom line, I think I
    went out too hard, and since miles 1-3 gave a mild
    incline, I think I left too much there. Here are my
    splits, compared to my previous race, and with HR numbers.
    See anything unusual?

    I don't think you went out too hard at all. In fact if
    anything, you probably went out a little too slow. On the
    Daniels or WAVA charts, assuming 52:12 is your best possible
    pace, you were pushing really close to your 5k limit on the
    last 4 miles.

    If anything, you may have pushed a little hard on mile 3 or
    4, which would explain the slight slowdown in mile 5 and 6.

    I'd recommend trying to get to the 2 mile mark in less than
    17:00 (but no faster than 16:30) for your next 10k race.
    Pace yourself right and you'll PR.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi pegasus.rutgers.edu~elflord

  3. Well, I ran the thing, too (looked for eNo on the course
    after I finished, but somehow missed him). It was my first
    10k since about '90, and my slowest ever. I've been racing
    ultras for the last couple of years after a very long hiatus
    from racing.

    Let me trot out the excuses right away: I'm 52 now, no
    speedwork in months, sick last 3 weeks, etc, etc. I was
    hoping to average about 7:00/mile, as a gentle re-
    introduction to road racing.

    I thought the course was easy; since a typical ultra around
    here has about 5,000' of climb in it, the 20-30 foot rises
    had no real effect.

    Running a 10k after all these years was a weird feeling,
    like being Rip Van Winkle -- I'm thinking, "what are all
    these people doing ahead of me???" I used to hit the mile
    in about 5:20 with the leader just up ahead, but now the
    guy with the watch is reading 6:55 and I can't even see
    first place. Can the ladies pushing the strollers be far
    behind! Arrgh!

    I couldn't get myself to work much harder than I do in the
    last few miles of a 50 miler, it was like I was stuck in
    economy mode, and I was afraid to find the pain point I used
    to know and love 20 years ago.

    Coming up on 5 miles, and feeling kind of dissapointed, I
    decided to breathe harder, two breath cycles every 5 steps
    or so. This let me pick up the pace considerably, I could
    have kicked myself for discovering this so late in the run,
    but it would have slowed me down even more. The people who
    were stuck 40 yards ahead came back to me. I still wasn't
    hurting much, it was nothing like the pain I remember in the
    old days, but I didn't want to push it so soon after kicking
    this bug I've had. (Am I becoming a wimp in my old age?)

    At the 6 mile point, I accelerated again, and dropped some
    more people. With about 100 yards to go, I kicked it in, and
    this is the only time in the race where I felt the old zing.
    I'm sure I max'd my heart beat out at the end. The guy I
    passed looked like he was moving in slow motion (I love
    passing people).

    I finished in 44:07, 10:32 slower than my pr set in '83.
    According to my WAVA score(80.3% in my prime) I could be
    running 38:02 at my age and that's what I'm going to shoot
    for. Forget the ultras for a while; I can't wait to hit
    the track!

    --Dan (with a new goal)

  4. "Donovan Rebbechi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    eNo said:

    Anyway, my overall time was 52:12.34, off by 15 sec from
    my previous PR, three weeks ago. Bottom line, I think I
    went out too hard, and since


    miles

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    1-3 gave a mild incline, I think I left too much there.
    Here are my


    splits,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    compared to my previous race, and with HR numbers. See
    anything unusual?

    I don't think you went out too hard at all. In fact if
    anything, you


    probably

    Quoted message said:

    went out a little too slow. On the Daniels or WAVA charts,
    assuming 52:12 is your best possible pace, you were
    pushing really close to your 5k limit


    on

    Quoted message said:

    the last 4 miles.

    If anything, you may have pushed a little hard on mile
    3 or 4, which would explain the slight slowdown in mile
    5 and 6.

    I'd recommend trying to get to the 2 mile mark in less
    than 17:00 (but no faster than 16:30) for your next 10k
    race. Pace yourself right and you'll


    PR.

    Thanks. I'll keep this in mind next time. But you want to
    know what I think did me in? I was wearing my HR monitor,
    set at a max of 195. When I started beeping at me, and I saw
    196-197-198... I fell apart psychologically. I bet I could
    have gotten those 15 seconds, or at least a good chunk of
    them, if I hadn't slowed down a hair for fear of seeing that
    white-lit corridor 🙂. My friend who is a physical trainer
    told me later that I shouldn't have been afraid and lost my
    kick. Lesson learned. Next 5K/10K, no HR monitor.

    --
    ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,-
    ,ø¤º eNo "If you can't go fast, go long." ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°-
    `°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º

  5. "Dan Stumpus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Well, I ran the thing, too (looked for eNo on the course
    after I finished, but somehow missed him). It was my first
    10k since about '90, and my slowest ever. I've been racing
    ultras for the last couple of years after


    a

    Quoted message said:

    very long hiatus from racing.

    Let me trot out the excuses right away: I'm 52 now, no
    speedwork in


    months,

    Quoted message said:

    sick last 3 weeks, etc, etc. I was hoping to average about
    7:00/mile, as a gentle re-introduction to road racing.

    I thought the course was easy; since a typical ultra
    around here has about 5,000' of climb in it, the 20-30
    foot rises had no real effect.

    Running a 10k after all these years was a weird feeling,
    like being Rip


    Van

    Quoted message said:

    Winkle -- I'm thinking, "what are all these people doing
    ahead of me???"


    I

    Quoted message said:

    used to hit the mile in about 5:20 with the leader just up
    ahead, but now the guy with the watch is reading 6:55 and
    I can't even see first place. Can the ladies pushing the
    strollers be far behind! Arrgh!

    I couldn't get myself to work much harder than I do in the
    last few miles


    of

    Quoted message said:

    a 50 miler, it was like I was stuck in economy mode, and I
    was afraid to find the pain point I used to know and love
    20 years ago.

    Coming up on 5 miles, and feeling kind of dissapointed, I
    decided to


    breathe

    Quoted message said:

    harder, two breath cycles every 5 steps or so. This let me
    pick up the


    pace

    Quoted message said:

    considerably, I could have kicked myself for discovering
    this so late in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    run, but it would have slowed me down even more. The
    people who were


    stuck

    Quoted message said:

    40 yards ahead came back to me. I still wasn't hurting
    much, it was


    nothing

    Quoted message said:

    like the pain I remember in the old days, but I didn't
    want to push it so soon after kicking this bug I've had.
    (Am I becoming a wimp in my old


    age?)

    Quoted message said:


    At the 6 mile point, I accelerated again, and dropped some
    more people. With about 100 yards to go, I kicked it in,
    and this is the only time in


    the

    Quoted message said:

    race where I felt the old zing. I'm sure I max'd my heart
    beat out at the end. The guy I passed looked like he was
    moving in slow motion (I love passing people).

    I finished in 44:07, 10:32 slower than my pr set in '83.
    According to my WAVA score(80.3% in my prime) I could be
    running 38:02 at my age and


    that's

    Quoted message said:

    what I'm going to shoot for. Forget the ultras for a
    while; I can't wait to hit the track!

    Hi, Dan. Sorry we missed each other. Oh, well. By the time I
    finished, you were probably showered and having breakfast
    🙂. No PR for you or me, but still a fun race, wasn't it?

    --
    ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,-
    ,ø¤º eNo "If you can't go fast, go long." ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°-
    `°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,,,,ø¤º

  6. Quoted message said:

    Hi, Dan. Sorry we missed each other. Oh, well. By the time I finished, you
    were probably showered and having breakfast 🙂.

    I jogged back on the course looking for you right after I
    caught my breath, but I was chatting to another old coot who
    finished just behind me, and must have missed the clydsdale
    with the yellow cap.

    Quoted message said:

    No PR for you or me, but still a fun race, wasn't it?

    I'd been avoiding the short stuff, and it was good to get my
    butt kicked. Now I'm motivated--nowhere to go but up! A fun
    race, mild (but not quite PR material) course, and I loved
    jogging on the soft sand for 20 minutes after the race.

    I saw gaggle of what I believe were arctic terns (which are
    the ultra champs among birds, migrating from the antartic to
    the arctic for the summer, and heading back in our winter.)
    That cheered me up.

    My PR course is the Venice/Marina Christmas run, by the way,
    also at the beach, and flat as a pool table.

    I'd ignore the heart monitor. As a fellow stat monkey, I'd
    enjoy looking at the stats, but wouldn't let it interfere
    with how I ran the race. Some people's hearts can rev up
    over 200 -- I have a talented friend whose max is 240! My
    highest was 205, and my highest as a 50 y/o is about 195.
    But I worked so hard at the finish that I probably would
    have broken the thing.

    I went for a 15 miler up to the top of Mt. Wilson today, a
    4,500 ft climb, and felt great, btw. Completely different
    muscles, I guess. I'm still sore, which is good -- I'll be
    growing some 10k muscles.

    See you at the next one...I'm going to be doing 5 and 10k's
    as part of my training week for awhile.

    PS: on a secure channel, I'd appreciate getting your email
    and name...

    Regards,

    Dan

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.