According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.
Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.
Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?
Tom Kunich said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?
is that a multiple choice question?
e-RICHIE
Tom Kunich said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?
I am pretty sure that this is related to Cat, Catamin (sp?). The drug
made famous during the Somalian famine/UN action. I'm I right?
"Richard Sachs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?
Actually I'm beginning to wonder what the hell is with the testing people.
UCI rates this stuff as a performance enhancer - very well, but perhaps it's
time to start putting out actual numbers because trace amounts of suspected
performance enhancers are beginning to show up all over the place.
You can go into some nightclubs in San Francisco, someone in the place
lights up one of those new age doobies and you test positive on the
Commercial Driver's License dope test and have your livelihood taken away
even if you run out right then.
Exactly what sort of people believe that they can get performance enhancing
from amphetamines and not test positive? Don't they understand that modern
testing methods can show one part in a billion? They can tell you if your
diet is lacking in anything in particular.
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Tom Kunich said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?I am pretty sure that this is related to Cat, Catamin (sp?). The drug
made famous during the Somalian famine/UN action. I'm I right?
Yeah Cathimine it comes from a plant called Kath if memory serves. It's
psychoactive and I can't imagine anyone taking something like that to
produce performance enhancing since it would probably induce hallucination
in high doses.
Tom Kunich said:You can go into some nightclubs in San Francisco, someone in the place
lights up one of those new age doobies and you test positive on the
Commercial Driver's License dope test and have your livelihood taken away
even if you run out right then.
This would have been useful to know the other day when I was actually
IN SF...
(lots of riders on PCH, which is still good to see)
Quoted message said:Exactly what sort of people believe that they can get performance enhancing
from amphetamines and not test positive? Don't they understand that modern
testing methods can show one part in a billion? They can tell you if your
diet is lacking in anything in particular.
A certin NZ track rider tested positive for amphetamines after
(allegedly) partaking of Ecstasy in a nightclub between heats and
finals. It would not surprise me that some similar mix would show up
in modern-day "party pills".
Hey did the Tour start yet? :-) Love the Orange County Choppers/Lance
ad on Discovery...
Stu
Tom Kunich said:Exactly what sort of people believe that they can get performance enhancing
from amphetamines and not test positive? Don't they understand that modern
testing methods can show one part in a billion? They can tell you if your
diet is lacking in anything in particular.
Stimulants never left. You take amphetamines in combination with
dope that helps you recover. It cranks your training volume way
up. This guy probably had some super hard training rides leading
up to the race and got caught by misjudging the detection window.
Bob Schwartz
[email hidden]
Would that be one of those Nightclubs on Castro street? I did not know that
you frequented those clubs, Thomas.
"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Richard Sachs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Tom Kunich said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?Actually I'm beginning to wonder what the hell is with the testing people.
UCI rates this stuff as a performance enhancer - very well, but perhaps
it's
Quoted message said:time to start putting out actual numbers because trace amounts of
suspected
Quoted message said:performance enhancers are beginning to show up all over the place.
You can go into some nightclubs in San Francisco, someone in the place
lights up one of those new age doobies and you test positive on the
Commercial Driver's License dope test and have your livelihood taken away
even if you run out right then.Exactly what sort of people believe that they can get performance
enhancing
Quoted message said:from amphetamines and not test positive? Don't they understand that modern
testing methods can show one part in a billion? They can tell you if your
diet is lacking in anything in particular.
Tom Kunich said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?
cathine is a stimulant, i think it might be a metabolite of something
else (pseudoephedrine ?). this is what phil zajicek tested positive for
in a chinese stage race.
Tom Kunich said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?
cathine is a stimulant, i think it might be a metabolite of something
else (pseudoephedrine ?). this is what phil zajicek tested positive for
in a chinese stage race.
are we talking about vitamin K, like a k-hole?
I do remember a pro cyclist telling me he dabbled
with this stuff - for recovery. weird stuff, like
techno trance rave party type stuff.
this german shumacher must party.
it's LCD style stimulant.
what drugs DON'T cyclists take?
are we talking about vitamin K, like a k-hole?
I do remember a pro cyclist telling me he dabbled
with this stuff - for recovery. weird stuff, like
techno trance rave party type stuff.
this german shumacher must party.
it's LCD style stimulant.
what drugs DON'T cyclists take?
Tom Kunich said:Exactly what sort of people believe that they can get performance
enhancing from amphetamines and not test positive? Don't they
understand that modern testing methods can show one part in a
billion? They can tell you if your diet is lacking in anything in
particular.
They're bike riders. The same that will try to convince anyone who will
listen that the drugs found in their possession were for their
dog/mother-in-law/aunt/pregnant wife/pregnant husband/all of the above.
Jeff
Jeff Jones said:pregnant husband
Pregnant son?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4624307.stm
Jeff Jones said:pregnant husband
Pregnant son?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4624307.stm
"Jeff Jones" <jeff@cyclingnews-punt-com> wrote in news:42c131ac$0$11036
[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:They're bike riders. The same that will try to convince anyone who will
listen that the drugs found in their possession were for their
dog/mother-in-law/aunt/pregnant wife/pregnant husband/all of the above.
Long-lost, dead twin?
"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.
As far as I know the FIA doesn't ban pilots from taking boosters.
Quoted message said:Is this a case of whacko chemistry or did someone spike his water
bottles?
oenophile said:"Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:According to cyclingnews Schumacher turned up positive for a
psychoactive drug related to amphetamines which only a dope would
believe wouldn't show a positive.As far as I know the FIA doesn't ban pilots from taking boosters.
very funny, but this is Stefan Schumacher, not "Schumi"
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.