What are the advantages/disadvantages of each. Last night I had a Presta snap off where it tapers. Schraders seem much more durable. Is there a reason I shouldn't switch to Schraders?
Thanks, Bill
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
What are the advantages/disadvantages of each. Last night I had a Presta snap off where it tapers. Schraders seem much more durable. Is there a reason I shouldn't switch to Schraders?
Thanks, Bill
Quoted post said:Originally posted by ad6mj
What are the advantages/disadvantages of each. Last night I had a Presta snap off where it tapers. Schraders seem much more durable. Is there a reason I shouldn't switch to Schraders?Thanks, Bill
It depends on the rim of the bike. If it's a wide MTB rim, there's no reason whatsoever not to switch. However, in a narrower road rim, the extra width of the valve hole (I think a Schrader is about 9mm) may cause a reduction in rim stability. Also, the valve width of the Schrader may prevent narrow tires from being mounted to a narrow rim.
Personally, I prefer Presta valves (even on my MTB), I find them easier to inflate and not as much air loss when removing the pump. To prevent snapping off the valve, it's important to apply the pump head as straight as possible, without applying any side-to-side force.
And you are correct, Schrader valves are more durable. It's all about personal preference and what your rim can accept.
Hope that helped.
Thanks, that helped.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.