joemarshall said:Am I the only person that doesn't like super wide hubs or cranks with
q-factor on a coker?
Yes they may increase the strength of the wheel so that fat people or
people who want to do trials on their coker or stand on their wheel
sideways can own a coker.
But they make it feel like riding a horse. It's okay if you've got wide
legs and ride horses a lot, but if your knees feel the right distance
apart with a narrow hub, a wider hub just doesn't feel nice. It feels
all wiggly and inefficient too.
I noticed riding behind John H on the 10 hour 100 mile ride, he has
cranks with a q factor and rides noticeably more wiggly than me.
I seem to remember Ken Looi said something similar about the wide hub a
bit back, but I might be going mad.
Whilst theoretical strength is nice, if it's at the expense of riding
performance, then surely you have to ask whether it's worth it for a
road wheel, when even the stock coker doesn't break when used for road
riding.
Joe
I like narrow hubs too- but I don't weigh much and I dont' use brakes.
I did have a quick ride on Beau Hoovers wide hub, and didn't notice too
much difference, although it was at relatively low speeds. I think
long cranks affect wheel wobble more than Q-factor. Short cranks feel
so smooth on the downhill. Some people tend to wobble more than others
too- something I noticed alot on the AUT. People like Scot Cooper have
virtually no wobble, Bronson, Nathan Hoover and I have a tiny amount,
Andy C and Irene slightly more, and Beau wiggles all over the place but
it doens't seem to slow him down :p
--
GizmoDuck
'www.adventureunicyclist.com' (http://www.adventureunicyclist.com/)
'Laos Unicycle Tour' (http://www.laosunitour.org)
'New Zealand Unicycle Federation' (http://www.unicycle.org.nz)
"It's not a unicycle ride if it's less than 30km." - note to self
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GizmoDuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/794
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093