rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Schlumpf 36

Started by siafirede · · Last activity · 31 posts · 955 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
30 November 2005
Last activity
6 December 2005
Original author
siafirede
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
955
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–31 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Try 170 or even 175mm cranks. Using 140's in 1.5 mode (56" effective
    wheel diameter) is equal to 90mm cranks on a direct drive coker.

    --
    unisk8r
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    unisk8r's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4660
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  2. Florian sent me 170mm original schlumpf cranks. I still have cranks in
    different sizes from my old selfmade 36" uni. Pictures of the old one
    are here http://www.wuk.at/hochrad/berichte/einrad_hans.php (German
    sorry!)

    I rode my old one with 125 and I loved it. I thought, that putting on
    the 170 mm cranks would be a waste of potential. I can always do that
    and I wanted to get the 170mm cranks from Florian, because I thought,
    that I would have problems with the shorter ones.
    Maybe I exaggerated the difficulty in 1:1.5 mode. On Saturday I rode 15
    km. I mounted shifted up and rode 7 km then I shifted down, made a
    U-turn, shifted up and rode back, shifted down and dismounted. No UPD
    all the way, all flat, a litte wind. Today I rode 28 km, I mounted,
    shifted up and rode 14 km. On the way back I shifted up and down a few
    times and had 1 UPD shifting up and 1 UPD shifting down. So I need to
    concentrate, when in 1:1.5 mode, but it is not impossible. I hope I
    will get used to it soon. I am happy to have the option to put on 170
    mm cranks, and things will surely be much easier then, but I want to
    stay with the 140 mm for a while now.

    I have not tried to change cranks on the Schlumpf and I am a bit
    anxious about it because I for sure do not want to ruin the hub. But
    maybe the 170ers will be my option in the end.

    --
    hans
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    hans's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5622
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  3. Florian sent me 170mm original schlumpf cranks. I still have cranks in
    different sizes from my old selfmade 36" uni. Pictures of the old one
    are here http://www.wuk.at/hochrad/berichte/einrad_hans.php (German
    sorry!)

    I rode my old one with 125 and I loved it. I thought, that putting on
    the 170 mm cranks would be a waste of potential. I can always do that
    and I wanted to get the 170mm cranks from Florian, because I thought,
    that I would have problems with the shorter ones.
    Maybe I exaggerated the difficulty in 1:1.5 mode. On Saturday I rode 15
    km. I mounted shifted up and rode 7 km then I shifted down, made a
    U-turn, shifted up and rode back, shifted down and dismounted. No UPD
    all the way, all flat, a litte wind. Today I rode 28 km, I mounted,
    shifted up and rode 14 km. On the way back I shifted up and down a few
    times and had 1 UPD shifting up and 1 UPD shifting down. So I need to
    concentrate, when in 1:1.5 mode, but it is not impossible. I hope I
    will get used to it soon. I am happy to have the option to put on 170
    mm cranks, and things will surely be much easier then, but I want to
    stay with the 140 mm for a while now.

    I have not tried to change cranks on the Schlumpf and I am a bit
    anxious about it because I for sure do not want to ruin the hub. But
    maybe the 170ers will be my option in the end.

    --
    hans
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    hans's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5622
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  4. hans, that's one hell of a unicycle you got yourself there 🙂

    --
    flyer
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    flyer's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9894
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  5. Hans,

    Thanks for posting the pictures of your setup. Does the wheel feel
    strong when you ride it or does it flex? Does anyone else have an
    opinion on Hans' 4 cross pattern setup? I still have a lot to look
    into but if I were to go ahead with the schlumpf 36 it looks like my
    best option now is to order the tom miller spokes and follow Hans'
    pattern and have a good wheelbuilder in my area assemble the wheel.

    Dave,
    Thanks for your emails and the post. I understand your position and
    think its great that you only wish to produce the best quality
    unicycles. If I have any other projects in mind I will be sure to
    contact you.

    --
    siafirede
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    siafirede's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6057
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  6. It feels strong enough, I do not feel it flex. I have a break and it
    does not rub. I did some short and steep uphill and there was no break
    rubbing.
    Just remember the hub is wider than a standard Coker hub and the
    flanges are bigger so the wheel is a little stronger than a standard
    Coker wheel. I have an Airfoil rim, that adds to the wheel strength.

    I am sure, the uni is strong enough for road riding. I do not plan to
    muni, jump or UPD with it ;-)

    --
    hans
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    hans's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5622
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  7. hans said:

    I do not plan to muni, jump or UPD with it

    Hans-

    Planning a UPD is contradictory.

    --
    harper

    -Greg Harper

    B L U E S H I F T

    *jc is the only main man. there can be no other.*

    This is still my nth post....*AWESOME!!!*
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    harper's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/426
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  8. harper said:

    Planning a UPD is contradictory.

    I always plan on mine...the only thing I leave open is the exact time
    of occurence.

    --
    tomblackwood

    Tailgate at your own risk...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tomblackwood's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3762
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  9. Am I the only person that doesn't like super wide hubs or cranks with
    q-factor on a coker?

    Yes they may increase the strength of the wheel so that fat people or
    people who want to do trials on their coker or stand on their wheel
    sideways can own a coker.

    But they make it feel like riding a horse. It's okay if you've got wide
    legs and ride horses a lot, but if your knees feel the right distance
    apart with a narrow hub, a wider hub just doesn't feel nice. It feels
    all wiggly and inefficient too.

    I noticed riding behind John H on the 10 hour 100 mile ride, he has
    cranks with a q factor and rides noticeably more wiggly than me.

    I seem to remember Ken Looi said something similar about the wide hub a
    bit back, but I might be going mad.

    Whilst theoretical strength is nice, if it's at the expense of riding
    performance, then surely you have to ask whether it's worth it for a
    road wheel, when even the stock coker doesn't break when used for road
    riding.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall

    my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  10. joemarshall said:

    Am I the only person that doesn't like super wide hubs or cranks with
    q-factor on a coker?

    Yes they may increase the strength of the wheel so that fat people or
    people who want to do trials on their coker or stand on their wheel
    sideways can own a coker.

    But they make it feel like riding a horse. It's okay if you've got wide
    legs and ride horses a lot, but if your knees feel the right distance
    apart with a narrow hub, a wider hub just doesn't feel nice. It feels
    all wiggly and inefficient too.

    I noticed riding behind John H on the 10 hour 100 mile ride, he has
    cranks with a q factor and rides noticeably more wiggly than me.

    I seem to remember Ken Looi said something similar about the wide hub a
    bit back, but I might be going mad.

    Whilst theoretical strength is nice, if it's at the expense of riding
    performance, then surely you have to ask whether it's worth it for a
    road wheel, when even the stock coker doesn't break when used for road
    riding.

    Joe

    I like narrow hubs too- but I don't weigh much and I dont' use brakes.
    I did have a quick ride on Beau Hoovers wide hub, and didn't notice too
    much difference, although it was at relatively low speeds. I think
    long cranks affect wheel wobble more than Q-factor. Short cranks feel
    so smooth on the downhill. Some people tend to wobble more than others
    too- something I noticed alot on the AUT. People like Scot Cooper have
    virtually no wobble, Bronson, Nathan Hoover and I have a tiny amount,
    Andy C and Irene slightly more, and Beau wiggles all over the place but
    it doens't seem to slow him down :p

    --
    GizmoDuck

    'www.adventureunicyclist.com' (http://www.adventureunicyclist.com/)
    'Laos Unicycle Tour' (http://www.laosunitour.org)
    'New Zealand Unicycle Federation' (http://www.unicycle.org.nz)

    "It's not a unicycle ride if it's less than 30km." - note to self
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    GizmoDuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/794
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45093

  11. harper said:
    hans said:

    I do not plan to muni, jump or UPD with it

    Planning a UPD is contradictory.

    But NOT planning a UPD is not.

    Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict
    --
    "erectile function trumps public image - David Stone, commenting on the importance of seat comfort"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.