Road Cycling · Public discussion

Scattante 2003 CFR Carbon - Opinions??

Started by Zuke · · Last activity · 9 posts · 2,465 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
2 January 2004
Last activity
8 January 2004
Original author
Zuke
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,465
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hey All,

    I'm looking to finally replace my 16 year old road bike with a Scattante 2003 CFR Carbon w/ triple
    Ultegra from Supergo. Anyone have any first-hand experience with these bikes?

    For $1,599, they look like an incredible deal for a full carbon frame/fork, full Ultegra groupo, and
    Shimano R540 Wheelset. I've had good experiences buying from Supergo and am not a euro-bike brand
    snob. I'm an intermediate road cyclist and mountain biker and weigh approx 145lbs.

    Thanks for any helpful input! -Zuke

  2. Quoted message said:

    For $1,599, they look like an incredible deal for a full carbon frame/fork, full Ultegra groupo,
    and Shimano R540 Wheelset. I've had good experiences buying from Supergo and am not a euro-bike
    brand snob. I'm an intermediate road cyclist and mountain biker and weigh approx 145lbs.

    Best bet would be to ride one and see how well you can make it fit, not to mention how it handles.
    The pricing is only $400 less than a new TREK full-carbon bike that will make its debut around the
    end of January, with the same frame as the 5200.

    There's no difficulty building a cheap carbon bike; the trick is to build one that handles well and
    is very durable.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles chainreactionbicycles.comchainreactionbicycles.com

    "Zuke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hey All,

    I'm looking to finally replace my 16 year old road bike with a Scattante 2003 CFR Carbon w/ triple
    Ultegra from Supergo. Anyone have any first-hand experience with these bikes?

    For $1,599, they look like an incredible deal for a full carbon frame/fork, full Ultegra groupo,
    and Shimano R540 Wheelset. I've had good experiences buying from Supergo and am not a euro-bike
    brand snob. I'm an intermediate road cyclist and mountain biker and weigh approx 145lbs.

    Thanks for any helpful input! -Zuke

  3. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    For $1,599, they look like an incredible deal for a full carbon frame/fork, full Ultegra groupo,
    and Shimano R540 Wheelset. I've


    had

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    good experiences buying from Supergo and am not a euro-bike brand snob. I'm an intermediate road
    cyclist and mountain biker and


    weigh

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    approx 145lbs.

    Best bet would be to ride one and see how well you can make it fit,


    not to

    Quoted message said:

    mention how it handles. The pricing is only $400 less than a new


    TREK

    Quoted message said:

    full-carbon bike that will make its debut around the end of January,


    with

    Quoted message said:

    the same frame as the 5200.

    There's no difficulty building a cheap carbon bike; the trick is to


    build

    Quoted message said:

    one that handles well and is very durable.

    Actually I would advise this route. There's a guy in the club that has a carbon bike that looks just
    like that Scantante (it might not be mind you) with some other off-brand name on it. It isn't a bad
    bike but neither is it anywhere near as good as a Trek.

  4. "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:hukJb.16425$lo3.6711
    @newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

    Quoted message said:

    Actually I would advise this route. There's a guy in the club that has a carbon bike that looks
    just like that Scantante (it might not be mind you) with some other off-brand name on it. It isn't
    a bad bike but neither is it anywhere near as good as a Trek.

    What are the differences?

  5. "Jenny" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:hukJb.16425$lo3.6711
    @newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

    Quoted message said:

    Actually I would advise this route. There's a guy in the club that has a carbon bike that looks
    just like that Scantante (it might not be mind you) with some other off-brand name on it. It
    isn't a bad bike but neither is it anywhere near as good as a Trek.

    What are the differences?

    If nothing else, one difference might be the warranty. I don't know what the warranty is on a
    *Scanttante* or any other Taiwanese-made carbon frame, but Trek has arguably one of the BEST
    warranties around - Lifetime to the original owner. At the very least, I would test ride an OCLV and
    see which one fits you the best....

  6. bfd said:

    "Jenny" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:hukJb.16425$lo3.6711
    @newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

    Quoted message said:

    Actually I would advise this route. There's a guy in the club that has a carbon bike that looks
    just like that Scantante (it might not be mind you) with some other off-brand name on it. It
    isn't a bad bike but neither is it anywhere near as good as a Trek.

    What are the differences?

    If nothing else, one difference might be the warranty. I don't know what the warranty is on a
    *Scanttante* or any other Taiwanese-made carbon frame, but Trek has arguably one of the BEST
    warranties around - Lifetime to the original owner. At the very least, I would test ride an OCLV
    and see which one fits you the best....


    In total agreement.

    Kenny Lee

  7. "Jenny" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    news:hukJb.16425$lo3.6711

    Quoted message said:

    @newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

    Quoted message said:

    Actually I would advise this route. There's a guy in the club that


    has

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a carbon bike that looks just like that Scantante (it might not be mind you) with some other off-
    brand name on it. It isn't a bad


    bike

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    but neither is it anywhere near as good as a Trek.

    What are the differences?

    In order to make the bike reliable they tend to overbuild them by a considerable margin. And since
    the layups aren't anywhere near as tight as the Trek believe me, you WANT them overbuilt.

    However, the result of all of this is that the bike is so stiff normally that it still rings like a
    metal bike and there isn't any weight advantage from going to carbon fiber.

    Now none of these are bad things, but if you're looking to move UP to a carbon fiber bike you might
    as well move up and not sideways.

  8. Guys, thanks for the discussion. Some food for thought for sure. I think I'll be heading down to Los
    Angeles this week and try out both bikes at a Supergo store down there...

    Once upon a time, on Sat, 03 Jan 2004 23:43:06 GMT, "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> scribed:

    Quoted message said:

    "Jenny" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    news:hukJb.16425$lo3.6711

    Quoted message said:

    @newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

    Quoted message said:

    Actually I would advise this route. There's a guy in the club that


    has

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a carbon bike that looks just like that Scantante (it might not be mind you) with some other
    off-brand name on it. It isn't a bad


    bike

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    but neither is it anywhere near as good as a Trek.

    What are the differences?

    In order to make the bike reliable they tend to overbuild them by a considerable margin. And since
    the layups aren't anywhere near as tight as the Trek believe me, you WANT them overbuilt.

    However, the result of all of this is that the bike is so stiff normally that it still rings like a
    metal bike and there isn't any weight advantage from going to carbon fiber.

    Now none of these are bad things, but if you're looking to move UP to a carbon fiber bike you might
    as well move up and not sideways.

  9. Quoted message said:

    Guys, thanks for the discussion. Some food for thought for sure. I think I'll be heading down to
    Los Angeles this week and try out both bikes at a Supergo store down there...

    I don't believe any Supergo shops sell TREK, but I think that Helen's Cyclery (which does sell TREK)
    isn't too far away from a Supergo.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com

    "Zuke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Guys, thanks for the discussion. Some food for thought for sure. I think I'll be heading down to
    Los Angeles this week and try out both bikes at a Supergo store down there...

    Once upon a time, on Sat, 03 Jan 2004 23:43:06 GMT, "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> scribed:

    Quoted message said:

    "Jenny" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    news:hukJb.16425$lo3.6711

    Quoted message said:

    @newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
    > Actually I would advise this route. There's a guy in the club that


    has

    Quoted message said:

    > a carbon bike that looks just like that Scantante (it might not be mind you) with some other
    > off-brand name on it. It isn't a bad


    bike

    Quoted message said:

    > but neither is it anywhere near as good as a Trek.

    What are the differences?

    In order to make the bike reliable they tend to overbuild them by a considerable margin. And
    since the layups aren't anywhere near as tight as the Trek believe me, you WANT them overbuilt.

    However, the result of all of this is that the bike is so stiff normally that it still rings like
    a metal bike and there isn't any weight advantage from going to carbon fiber.

    Now none of these are bad things, but if you're looking to move UP to a carbon fiber bike you
    might as well move up and not sideways.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.