Road Cycling · Public discussion

savoldelli?

Started by Bill Patterson · · Last activity · 27 posts · 830 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
30 June 2005
Last activity
5 July 2005
Original author
Bill Patterson
Posts
27
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
830
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–27 of 27
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. If we could ONLY get George to believe in himself a bit more he could
    win more in the spring than he has. Now with the super strong Classics
    group on the team George may not get the chance to shine like he could.

  2. Bill Patterson said:
    Tom said:

    Been awake the last few weeks? I think not.

    Tom


    Oops. Looked only at the Velo news tdf guide, didn't check up to date
    info. Sorry about the spelling. Eyes are just as good as the rest of me.
    Which is old.

    Your spelling was correct; I think Robert Chung was trying to kid,
    because he's not dumb.

  3. Jonathan v.d. Sluis said:

    "Kenny" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    gym.gravity schreef:

    Quoted message said:

    > > That is a ridiculously strong team.
    > You aren't kidding and they're missing Eki. Lance has said that he
    > feels this is the strongest team he's ever started the race with, and
    > on paper it looks like it.
    > Bill C

    And if all goes well, by the end of July it will be hailed as the
    strongest Tour team *ever*.

    But what will be left when LA doesn't win the tour?

    'A team with too many leaders'.

    a blue and grey T-Mobile.

  4. sonarrat said:

    I think Robert Chung was trying to kid, because he's not dumb.

    Have you got any numbers to back that assertion (1.3 or 42 is not
    sufficient). Only the facts will do on rbr.

  5. Donald Munro said:
    sonarrat said:

    I think Robert Chung was trying to kid, because he's not dumb.

    Have you got any numbers to back that assertion (1.3 or 42 is not
    sufficient). Only the facts will do on rbr.

    If it is not fact, then it is implied that it is opinion... at least, in
    reasonable society.

  6. sonarrat said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I think Robert Chung was trying to kid, because he's not dumb.

    Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    Have you got any numbers to back that assertion (1.3 or 42 is not
    sufficient). Only the facts will do on rbr.

    sonarrat said:

    If it is not fact, then it is implied that it is opinion... at least, in
    reasonable society.

    rbr is reasonable society ?

  7. Donald Munro said:
    sonarrat said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I think Robert Chung was trying to kid, because he's not dumb.

    Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:

    Have you got any numbers to back that assertion (1.3 or 42 is not
    sufficient). Only the facts will do on rbr.

    sonarrat said:

    If it is not fact, then it is implied that it is opinion... at least, in
    reasonable society.

    rbr is reasonable society ?

    I do my best.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.