In article <[email hidden]>,
Matthew said:I was asked to help a group Boy Scouts with their Cycling Merit Badge. The information below is
taken from the BSA's guide to Safe Scouting
usscouts.orgg2ssIX.htmlOpen ↗
<quote> Right Bike Ride only a bike that fits you. Select a bike that permits you to put both feet
on the ground while sitting on the seat. The hand-grips should be no higher than your shoulder or
lower than your seat. </quote>
Wouldn't those recommendations gaurantee scouts are riding a bike that doesn't fit? I think fifty
miles is going to be a long ride on a bike like that. At least they don't say, "Stay on the
sidewalk."
Heh. The "no higher than your shoulder" remark is what rats this recommendation out: it's aimed at
kids riding banana-seat bikes, for which these fit recommendations might, maybe make sense, and in
which there might actually be any danger of your handlebars coming above your shoulders. (I recently
had my handlebars above my shoulders while I was on my commuter road bike, but only for a very short
period of time, and I do not recommend the experience).
They also say "don't ride after dark", and recommend a water bottle for "long trips" (That's a
pretty short trip for most of us...).
Waitaminit. "Biking is unsafe on wet pavement and on windy days"? Well, there goes my commute. How
old are these Scouts? 8?
But then it goes on to recommend a maximum of 6h/day of riding. That's a pretty serious ride!
These rules are in dire need of some updating, or at the very least, consistency. You can almost
hear the ad hoc nature of them, each the result of a bike outing gone wrong.
At the very least, the rules should assume fitment to a typical MTB, which is what most novice
cyclist Scouts are likely to turn up on.
--
Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] sfu.ca~rcousineOpen ↗ President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club