runners against bush

Hey'd you guys see the look on Boobra Bush'es face as she was rushed by
hecklers in Israel? It was about the funniest thing I ever saw.
Reminded me of a male dog I had, and the look on his face when another
male came along and "slid the salami" up his butt unexpectedly (not
that's an expected time for it, or maybe there is? Consult expert:
Charles?).

Bush isn't totally stupid! :-)

If you cant break a 20-minute 5K, he's going to beat you.

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Bush isn't totally stupid! :-)

Hmmm, we need to think more on this point....

-DF

Come on guys, get over it.....Kerry lost...
Can't you come up with something better than name calling...Or is this a
sign of your intelligent minds at work???

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"I'm very concerned about cloning. I worry about a world in which
cloning becomes acceptable."
- PRESIDENT BUSH

LOL. I wouldn't clone clown W for anything in this world (well may be
not anything) but I sure wouldn't want a clone of this buffoon with
the intelligence of a baboon.

And pray that W doesn't veto the $295 billion proposed for building
(repairing) highways. For once doesn't this clown want to do something
constructive? I have my fingers crossed.

"BLAKE WARD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Come on guys, get over it.....Kerry lost...

Has nothing to do with Kerry - that is old news.

Quoted message said:

Can't you come up with something better than name calling...Or is this
a
sign of your intelligent minds at work???

In general, W has been very ineffective since his re-election. Cheney
should assign him something to do that will succeed despite his penchant
for messing up a wet dream. Notice the unrest within the party? They
have to survive after he leaves and will not blindly follow him into
oblivion.

Quoted message said:

In general, W has been very ineffective since his re-election.
Cheney should assign him something to do that will succeed
despite his penchant for messing up a wet dream. Notice the
unrest within the party? They have to survive after he leaves
and will not blindly follow him into oblivion.

Much as I agree with you, we got to stop this thread soon, before
we soak rec.running in a blood bath. Ever tried reasoning with a
conservative (republican) in person? Some of them are so rabid,
you might as well bang your head against a rock.

Just in closing - W was more ineffective in his first term. He
fancies himself to be a wartime leader. I am still not sure that
the war on Iraq is justified - definitely not considering the
staggering burden on US treasury and the number of lives
lost in achieving nothing useful. Freeing Iraqis is a ton of bull.
There were lot of other people in the world that needed saving
more quickly than Iraqis - how about Sudan, for instance?

Regarding [censored] - wasn't he the one who proposed that
filibustering should be voided? I could be wrong but I remember
something to that effect.

Nevertheless, I exit out of this thread at this point, since it will
serve no purpose. Call me a coward (or other names) if you will.

Quoted message said:

Much as I agree with you, we got to stop this thread soon, before
we soak rec.running in a blood bath.

Sounds like a great idea. However, you continue to fuel the fire with
the following...

Quoted message said:

Ever tried reasoning with a
conservative (republican) in person? Some of them are so rabid,
you might as well bang your head against a rock.

Just in closing - W was more ineffective in his first term. He
fancies himself to be a wartime leader. I am still not sure that
the war on Iraq is justified - definitely not considering the
staggering burden on US treasury and the number of lives
lost in achieving nothing useful. Freeing Iraqis is a ton of bull.
There were lot of other people in the world that needed saving
more quickly than Iraqis - how about Sudan, for instance?

Regarding [censored] - wasn't he the one who proposed that
filibustering should be voided? I could be wrong but I remember
something to that effect.

Nevertheless, I exit out of this thread at this point, since it will
serve no purpose. Call me a coward (or other names) if you will.

Funny, the same could be said about a Democrat...What's there vision or
fixes for our problems..? The only thing I ever hear is attack...Where is
the resolve?? What kind of vision or actions does Howard Dean offer..Tim
Russer had him choking and spitting on Meet The Press...I guess what your
offering is another MoveOn.org commercial.....I and many other Republicans
would love to entertain a solid true vision for this country...Just show us
what your offering...Its obvious what your party is doing now, isn't
working..Hell, the entertainment industry gave President Bush the
election......

"TenKBabe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Much as I agree with you, we got to stop this thread soon, before
we soak rec.running in a blood bath.

Sounds like a great idea. However, you continue to fuel the fire with
the following...

Quoted message said:

Ever tried reasoning with a
conservative (republican) in person? Some of them are so rabid,
you might as well bang your head against a rock.

Just in closing - W was more ineffective in his first term. He
fancies himself to be a wartime leader. I am still not sure that
the war on Iraq is justified - definitely not considering the
staggering burden on US treasury and the number of lives
lost in achieving nothing useful. Freeing Iraqis is a ton of bull.
There were lot of other people in the world that needed saving
more quickly than Iraqis - how about Sudan, for instance?

Regarding [censored] - wasn't he the one who proposed that
filibustering should be voided? I could be wrong but I remember
something to that effect.

Nevertheless, I exit out of this thread at this point, since it will
serve no purpose. Call me a coward (or other names) if you will.