On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:51:37 GMT, "Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction
Bicycles said:Quoted message said:Thanks for the insight. I agree that if you want a new
bike NOW, get it, don't wait! However, if the Chinese are
increasing their costs, how soon will it be before these
same mfrs will move their production facilities over to
other "lower-cost" countries like maybe the Philippines
or Vietnam or even Cambodia....
It's inevitable that production will continue to shift
towards emerging 3rd-world countries as a means to save
money. However, the Philippines might not be as likely as
many others, since they've become relatively stagnant in
their "emergence." One would have thought that the
Philippines would have evolved into a major manufacturing
center long ago, given their relative proximity to
countries that have long felt the effects of improving (and
expensive) living standards. Probably just shows my
ignorance of the Asian economic situation.
At the risk of going far, far off-topic here:
Proximity or exposure to higher standards of living has
little to do with the underlying structural problems in the
country. This would be akin to arguing that Watts'
proximity to Hollywood should have made it a very affluent
district by now.
The Philippines lags behind other ASEAN economies because
of, among other things:
1) Bad governance: Doing business there is notoriously
difficult for overseas firms; they are in particular
hamepered by constitutional provisions against the
foreign ownership of land.
2) An entrenched landed elite. The landed elite class also
happens to control most of domestic industrial
activity; they're rolling in so much money from their
rents that there is basically zero incentive for them
to compete globally.
As regards this, my father always likes to tell the story of
San Miguel Beer--once the premier beer in Asia, shipped and
available everywhere, especially where U.S. forces went. In
Hong Kong in the seventies, said Dad, everybody drank "Sanee
Mig" as they said in the local pidgin. Now, San Miguel has
lost regional market share to other players: Tiger, Singha,
Tsingtao--and to global ones, like Carlsberg. The
corporation, publically-listed but closely-held by the
Cojuanco family, didn't and doesnt' do much about the
situation, since they seem to be satisfied only with
domestic Philippine consumption.
3) Poor political stability, at least when compared to its
other ASEAN member-states. Unconsolidated democracy, in
this respect, is far more of a liability to an emerging
economy than autocratic developmental-statism. It's very
difficult to argue with Singapore and Malaysia's parallel
success over the past 40 years, despite or even because
of strong authoritarian rule. A simmering insurgency in
Mindanao and a sporadically-active armed Communist
movement discourage foreign investors--never mind that
the worst of the fighting is concentrated in few
districts.
In sum, the Philippines is twenty to thirty years behind
Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. In the 1960s,
the Philippine economy was by far the most developed and
most productive of the original ASEAN members. Twenty years
of abusive and corrupt rule under Ferdinand Marcos drained
the public treasury and bankrupted the economy. For the
Filipino and the historian, there's a bitter irony in this:
Marcos had first come to power pledging to break the power
of the traditional politicians (the sons of that same landed
elite that had, in their turn, collaborated with Spain,
America, and Japan), and mobilize the country for
development as part of a "New Society." The difference was
that, unlike Lee Kwan-Yew's enlightened and largely benign
developmental statism in Singapore, Marcos' kleptocracy
actually set the country back.
I'd love to see things change for the better in my lifetime,
and the lifteime of my cousins. But for many of us, the only
option is really emigration.
-Luigi