General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

RSPB bans camping

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 34 posts · 883 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 April 2005
Last activity
24 April 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
34
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
883
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 34
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society
    for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on
    the Island of Islay in Scotland.

    Where next?

    Angus Macmillan
    www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
    www.killhunting.org
    www.con-servation.org.uk

  2. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society
    for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on
    the Island of Islay in Scotland.

    Where next?

    Did they say why?
    --
    If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
    then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
    situation.

  3. Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society
    for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on
    the Island of Islay in Scotland.

    Where next?

    Did they say why?

    I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.

  4. A said:

    Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society
    for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on
    the Island of Islay in Scotland.

    Where next?

    Did they say why?

    I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.

    Here's a link to the letter:

    http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/37348.html

    I get the impression there's a certain history to the matter. I
    wonder why the RSPB bought the area?

    Norman Tulloch

  5. On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 17:15:32 GMT, Norman Tulloch

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...
    > According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society
    > for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on
    > the Island of Islay in Scotland.
    >
    > Where next?

    Did they say why?

    I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.

    Here's a link to the letter:

    http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/37348.html

    I get the impression there's a certain history to the matter. I
    wonder why the RSPB bought the area?

    Norman Tulloch

    Well, there's not a lot on the RSPB site...

    http://www.rspb.org.uk/reserves/guide/t/theoa/index.asp

    Norman Tulloch

  6. Norman Tulloch said:

    On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 17:15:32 GMT, Norman Tulloch

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    > [email hidden] said...
    >> According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society
    >> for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on
    >> the Island of Islay in Scotland.
    >>
    >> Where next?
    >
    > Did they say why?

    I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.

    Here's a link to the letter:

    http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/37348.html

    I get the impression there's a certain history to the matter. I
    wonder why the RSPB bought the area?

    Norman Tulloch

    Well, there's not a lot on the RSPB site...

    http://www.rspb.org.uk/reserves/guide/t/theoa/index.asp

    Norman Tulloch

    It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from going
    there but they try to discourage it.

    http://www.land-care.org.uk/environment/current_topics/2004/february2004/mitchell_glasg_chough_04_02/mitchell_glasg_chough_04_02.htm

    --

    Don`t Worry, Be Happy
    Sandy
    --
    E-Mail:- [email hidden]
    Website:- http://www.ftscotland.co.uk
    Looking for a webhost? Try http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=2966019

  7. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from going
    there but they try to discourage it.


    Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
    --
    If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
    then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
    situation.

  8. Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from
    going there but they try to discourage it.


    Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?

    Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?

    --
    Adrian

  9. Adrian Tupper said:

    Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from
    going there but they try to discourage it.


    Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?

    Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?

    What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
    ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

  10. Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Adrian Tupper said:

    Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    > [email hidden] said...
    >> It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    >> moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from
    >> going there but they try to discourage it.
    >>
    > Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?

    Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?

    What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...


    Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.

    Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people
    around here...

    <fx: ducks & wrens...>

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
    ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

  11. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Adrian Tupper said:

    Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...
    > It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    > moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from
    > going there but they try to discourage it.
    >
    Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?

    Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?

    What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...


    Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.

    --
    If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
    then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
    situation.

  12. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >news:[email hidden]:
    >
    >> [email hidden] said...
    >>> It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    >>> moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from
    >>> going there but they try to discourage it.
    >>>
    >> Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
    >
    >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?

    What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...


    Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.

    Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people
    around here...

    <fx: ducks & wrens...>


    Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a
    bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.
    --
    If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
    then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
    situation.

  13. "Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...
    > On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper
    > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >
    > >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    > >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
    >
    > What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
    >
    Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.

    Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people
    around here...

    <fx: ducks & wrens...>


    Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a
    bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.


    You guys have got me 'owlin' here. I know it's a great hobby, but why would
    anyone want to flamin' go camping somewhere where they may put rare birds
    off their nests. They'd probably feel bitter'n angry about it, I'd be raven
    for days I think.

    Andrew

  14. "Andrew McGleish" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:32:49 +0100, Fran <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >[email hidden] said...
    >> On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper
    >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> >
    >> >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    >> >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
    >>
    >> What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
    >>
    >Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.

    Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people
    around here...

    <fx: ducks & wrens...>


    Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a
    bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.


    You guys have got me 'owlin' here. I know it's a great hobby, but why
    would anyone want to flamin' go camping somewhere where they may put rare
    birds off their nests. They'd probably feel bitter'n angry about it, I'd
    be raven for days I think.

    I feel I mus' reply. If I want to put up my spare own tent on a blue tip of
    rock after walkin' and puffin' for miles and miles I'll do so.
    I like to falk on the wild side. Even if people arend allowed. I'll kraai if
    I can't. I 'vink nature is a merel'cal.

    --
    Theo
    www.theosphotos.fotopic.net

    'who doesn't fly with the Raaf or Dutchbird' (can you spot the dutch birds
    ?)

  15. Norman Tulloch said:
    A said:

    Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    >According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society
    >for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on
    >the Island of Islay in Scotland.
    >
    >Where next?

    Did they say why?

    I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.

    Here's a link to the letter:

    http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/37348.html

    I get the impression there's a certain history to the matter. I
    wonder why the RSPB bought the area?

    Norman Tulloch


    I though that the provisions of the Land Reform Act(Scotland) would
    over-ride this sort of "ban". While I'd not want to intentionally
    disturb nesting birds, a test case might be worthwhile. This needs a bit
    more investigation. . . .

    druidh

  16. This thread is really getting on my [censored].....

  17. Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from going
    there but they try to discourage it.


    Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?

    The problem generally with the RSPB is they try to impose bans that
    are longer term and more stringent than they need to, often in order
    to preserve birds that are anything but rare.

    However, in this case, given the OP, they are almost certainly
    entirely justified 🙂

    --
    Stop ID cards and the Database State
    http://www.no2id.net/

  18. In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...
    > On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper
    > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    > >news:[email hidden]:
    > >
    > >> [email hidden] said...
    > >>> It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    > >>> moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from
    > >>> going there but they try to discourage it.
    > >>>
    > >> Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
    > >
    > >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    > >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
    >
    > What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
    >
    Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.

    Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people
    around here...

    <fx: ducks & wrens...>


    Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a
    bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.

    You're raven mad ! Stop crowing!
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  19. In article <[email hidden]>, Andrew
    McGleish <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:


    "Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:32:49 +0100, Fran <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >[email hidden] said...
    >> On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper
    >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> >
    >> >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    >> >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
    >>
    >> What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
    >>
    >Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.

    Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people
    around here...

    <fx: ducks & wrens...>


    Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a
    bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.


    You guys have got me 'owlin' here. I know it's a great hobby, but why would
    anyone want to flamin' go camping somewhere where they may put rare birds
    off their nests. They'd probably feel bitter'n angry about it, I'd be raven
    for days I think.

    Andrew


    Go fly you're kite somewhere else!
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

  20. In article <[email hidden]>, Chris Street
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:
    Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:32:49 +0100, Fran <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >[email hidden] said...
    >> On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper
    >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >> >news:[email hidden]:
    >> >
    >> >> [email hidden] said...
    >> >>> It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on
    >> >>> moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from
    >> >>> going there but they try to discourage it.
    >> >>>
    >> >> Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
    >> >
    >> >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings
    >> >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
    >>
    >> What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
    >>
    >Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.

    Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people
    around here...

    <fx: ducks & wrens...>


    Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a
    bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.

    Tut. Cannot beleive that with the OP's history what's sauce for the goose
    is just as good for the gander.

    Ne-Ne ne Ne-Ne
    --
    Bill Grey
    http://www.billboy.co.uk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.