According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on the Island of Islay in Scotland.
According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on the Island of Islay in Scotland.
Where next?
Did they say why? -- If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs... then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the situation.
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on the Island of Islay in Scotland.
Where next?
Did they say why?
I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on the Island of Islay in Scotland.
Where next?
Did they say why?
I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said... > According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society > for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on > the Island of Islay in Scotland. > > Where next?
Did they say why?
I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
> [email hidden] said... >> According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society >> for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on >> the Island of Islay in Scotland. >> >> Where next? > > Did they say why?
I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.
It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from going there but they try to discourage it.
It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from going there but they try to discourage it.
Makes sense to me. So what's the problem? -- If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs... then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the situation.
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from going there but they try to discourage it.
Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from going there but they try to discourage it.
Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
Best wishes, -- ,, (**)PeeWiglet~~ / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
> [email hidden] said... >> It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on >> moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from >> going there but they try to discourage it. >> > Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.
Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people around here...
<fx: ducks & wrens...>
Best wishes, -- ,, (**)PeeWiglet~~ / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said... > It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on > moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from > going there but they try to discourage it. > Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.
-- If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs... then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the situation.
On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in >news:[email hidden]: > >> [email hidden] said... >>> It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on >>> moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from >>> going there but they try to discourage it. >>> >> Makes sense to me. So what's the problem? > >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed?
What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it...
Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.
Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people around here...
<fx: ducks & wrens...>
Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron. -- If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs... then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the situation.
"Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
Fran said:
[email hidden] said... > On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> > > >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings > >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed? > > What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it... > Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.
Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people around here...
<fx: ducks & wrens...>
Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.
You guys have got me 'owlin' here. I know it's a great hobby, but why would anyone want to flamin' go camping somewhere where they may put rare birds off their nests. They'd probably feel bitter'n angry about it, I'd be raven for days I think.
"Andrew McGleish" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:32:49 +0100, Fran <[email hidden]> wrote:
>[email hidden] said... >> On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper >> <[email hidden]> wrote: >> >> >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> > >> >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings >> >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed? >> >> What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it... >> >Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.
Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people around here...
<fx: ducks & wrens...>
Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.
You guys have got me 'owlin' here. I know it's a great hobby, but why would anyone want to flamin' go camping somewhere where they may put rare birds off their nests. They'd probably feel bitter'n angry about it, I'd be raven for days I think.
I feel I mus' reply. If I want to put up my spare own tent on a blue tip of rock after walkin' and puffin' for miles and miles I'll do so. I like to falk on the wild side. Even if people arend allowed. I'll kraai if I can't. I 'vink nature is a merel'cal.
-- Theo www.theosphotos.fotopic.net
'who doesn't fly with the Raaf or Dutchbird' (can you spot the dutch birds ?)
Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
>According to a letter in yesterday's Glasgow Herald the Royal Society >for the Protection of Birds has banned camping on the Oa Peninsula on >the Island of Islay in Scotland. > >Where next?
Did they say why?
I would imagine it is for a good reason, given the OP.
I get the impression there's a certain history to the matter. I wonder why the RSPB bought the area?
Norman Tulloch
I though that the provisions of the Land Reform Act(Scotland) would over-ride this sort of "ban". While I'd not want to intentionally disturb nesting birds, a test case might be worthwhile. This needs a bit more investigation. . . .
It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from going there but they try to discourage it.
Makes sense to me. So what's the problem?
The problem generally with the RSPB is they try to impose bans that are longer term and more stringent than they need to, often in order to preserve birds that are anything but rare.
However, in this case, given the OP, they are almost certainly entirely justified 🙂
In article <[email hidden]>, Fran <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
Fran said:
[email hidden] said... > On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in > >news:[email hidden]: > > > >> [email hidden] said... > >>> It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on > >>> moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from > >>> going there but they try to discourage it. > >>> > >> Makes sense to me. So what's the problem? > > > >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings > >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed? > > What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it... > Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.
Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people around here...
<fx: ducks & wrens...>
Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.
In article <[email hidden]>, Andrew McGleish <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
"Fran" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:32:49 +0100, Fran <[email hidden]> wrote:
>[email hidden] said... >> On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper >> <[email hidden]> wrote: >> >> >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> > >> >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings >> >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed? >> >> What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it... >> >Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.
Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people around here...
<fx: ducks & wrens...>
Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.
You guys have got me 'owlin' here. I know it's a great hobby, but why would anyone want to flamin' go camping somewhere where they may put rare birds off their nests. They'd probably feel bitter'n angry about it, I'd be raven for days I think.
In article <[email hidden]>, Chris Street <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
Fran said:
[email hidden] said...
Quoted message said:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:32:49 +0100, Fran <[email hidden]> wrote:
>[email hidden] said... >> On 16 Apr 2005 21:46:29 GMT, Adrian Tupper >> <[email hidden]> wrote: >> >> >Fran <[email hidden]> wrote in >> >news:[email hidden]: >> > >> >> [email hidden] said... >> >>> It's the Choughs, they nest on the cliffs, there are restrictions on >> >>> moutaineers that go to cluimb them. They haven't stopped anyone from >> >>> going there but they try to discourage it. >> >>> >> >> Makes sense to me. So what's the problem? >> > >> >Me too. None, of course. Like all the other problems the OP brings >> >to our attention. Perhaps he isn't feeling to ..ummm... choughed? >> >> What a lark! Anyway, there's no point in grousing about it... >> >Quite. You just have to swiftly swallow your reservations.
Anyway, perhaps the story isn't true! There are some gullable people around here...
<fx: ducks & wrens...>
Come on, it's someone else's tern. BTW, could you speak up a bit starling? I'm a little hard of heron.
Tut. Cannot beleive that with the OP's history what's sauce for the goose is just as good for the gander.