Royal Tongan Limu

Peter Bowditch said:

Remember limu?

I have some good news and I have some bad news.

Both are at http://www.royaltonganlimu.com/index.asp

Do I detect the footprints of the FTC?

Tsu

--
To doubt everything or to believe everything
are two equally convenient solutions; both
dispense with the necessity of reflection.
- Jules Henri Poincaré

Tsu Dho Nimh <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

Peter Bowditch said:

Remember limu?

I have some good news and I have some bad news.

Both are at http://www.royaltonganlimu.com/index.asp

Do I detect the footprints of the FTC?

Tsu

What you are seeing is the results of the seasilver scammers getting busted.
From what I have gathered, the company is shutting down and going through a
rename and reorg.

r

--
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic."

Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"

Quoted message said:

Peter Bowditch said:

Remember limu?

I have some good news and I have some bad news.

Both are at http://www.royaltonganlimu.com/index.asp

Do I detect the footprints of the FTC?

Tsu

I can't wait for Jan Drew's favorite links to start disappearing. They'll
_ALL_ start returning a 404 Error when clicked on. EOM has finally won!

Peter Bowditch said:

Remember limu?

I have some good news and I have some bad news.

Both are at http://www.royaltonganlimu.com/index.asp

I wonder what they are going to do with all the wild Limu's?

Interestingly, they list their address on their website as:

255 Premier Boulevard, Suite 500
Lake Mary, FL 32746

However, this is the correct one..

255 Primera Blvd
Lake Mary, FL 32746

This is a large office building where there are several insurance
companies, but no evidence that there is even a mail drop.

Most curious.

Ilsa9 said:

Quoted message said:

Peter Bowditch said:

Remember limu?

I have some good news and I have some bad news.

Both are at http://www.royaltonganlimu.com/index.asp

Do I detect the footprints of the FTC?

Tsu

I can't wait for Jan Drew's favorite links to start disappearing. They'll
_ALL_ start returning a 404 Error when clicked on. EOM has finally won!

I am convinced that Jan does not read the links she posts. Look at the
list she just posted supporting toxic cleanses. None of the sites
mentioned tham.

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:41:56 GMT, Peter Bowditch <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Remember limu?

I have some good news and I have some bad news.

Both are at http://www.royaltonganlimu.com/index.asp

What's the bad news ?

Mark Probert <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Most curious.

Less curious than why Will Ketcher Probert keeps changing his email
addresses and refuses to respond why the NY Bar Association had to pay
6 of his former disgruntled clients ... and why he is no longer
licensed to practice law ... yet continues to bash those intent of
helping others.

www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html

www.humanticsfoundation.com/DisinfoAgents.htm

WB said:

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:41:56 GMT, Peter Bowditch <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Remember limu?

I have some good news and I have some bad news.

Both are at http://www.royaltonganlimu.com/index.asp

What's the bad news ?

The bad news is personal - every time I do a link check for The
Millenium Project and find another scammer has 404ed, I have to do
some work. Soon I won't have Royal Limu to kick around any more.

--
Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
I'm a Bright. Are you?

Rich Andrews said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Both are at http://www.royaltonganlimu.com/index.asp

Quoted message said:

What you are seeing is the results of the seasilver scammers getting busted.
From what I have gathered, the company is shutting down and going through a
rename and reorg.

So they will emerge with the same cast of characters, under a new
name, selling more [censored], having shafted all their distributors of
the previous product.

Serial scammers?

Tsu

--
To doubt everything or to believe everything
are two equally convenient solutions; both
dispense with the necessity of reflection.
- Jules Henri Poincaré

[email hidden] (David Wright)

Quoted message said:

No more curious than your continued failure to explain why you
trivialized the Holocaust.

You poor Shill ... having to make up some ugly lies in your vain
attempt to harm me ...

For anything I have written on the internet regarding the Nazi
holocaust and the silicone holocaust ...

http:[email hidden]+holocaust&btnG=Google+Search

For info on this desperate Quack Flack ...

http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/DisinfoAgentsFAQ.htm#WrongerThanWright

For info on breast implants ...

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

Tsu Dho Nimh said:

Do I detect the footprints of the FTC?

I think it is more likely that DEI folded up shop
because their parent company (Nature's Bounty,
a.k.a. NBTY) realized the enormous liability
risk they were taking. At some point, their
lawyers must have seen the file I posted about
how fucoidan enhances tumor metastasis.
NBTY is a billion-dollar company, and to risk
all of that over RTL would be very foolish.

Remember that RTL was being promoted to
cancer patients. When cancer follows its
normal course, it advances through metastasis,
ultimately killing the patient. All it would take
would be a few lawsuits in which a cancer
patient says "I took the limu, and then my
cancer metastasized" to pose an unacceptable
risk of liability, especially if plaintiff had a
sharp lawyer and an easily swayed jury.

And if that weren't enough, it's not clear
that limu was a legal product. Although the
laws on natural products sold as dietary
supplements are remarkably loose, they are
not non-existent. When you introduce a new
product ("new" meaning not marketed in the
U.S. before 1994), you must submit a pre-market
notification to the FDA at least 75 days before
marketing the product. This was never done
for RTL. If the 75-day pre-market notification
requirement was applicable to this product, it would
look very bad in the eyes of the jury if someone
was claiming injury from a product that was itself
illegal.

When you combine that with NBTY's unsavory
past and present (they are facing a $146 million
fine from the federal government for violations
of the Controlled Substances Act), a jury
would not be likely to feel favorably about
NBTY.

For details about the $146 million, see:
http://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/hotnews/34h18141613.html

Is there no '[censored] list' for these people ?
Anth

"Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tsu Dho Nimh said:

Do I detect the footprints of the FTC?

I think it is more likely that DEI folded up shop
because their parent company (Nature's Bounty,
a.k.a. NBTY) realized the enormous liability
risk they were taking. At some point, their
lawyers must have seen the file I posted about
how fucoidan enhances tumor metastasis.
NBTY is a billion-dollar company, and to risk
all of that over RTL would be very foolish.

Remember that RTL was being promoted to
cancer patients. When cancer follows its
normal course, it advances through metastasis,
ultimately killing the patient. All it would take
would be a few lawsuits in which a cancer
patient says "I took the limu, and then my
cancer metastasized" to pose an unacceptable
risk of liability, especially if plaintiff had a
sharp lawyer and an easily swayed jury.

And if that weren't enough, it's not clear
that limu was a legal product. Although the
laws on natural products sold as dietary
supplements are remarkably loose, they are
not non-existent. When you introduce a new
product ("new" meaning not marketed in the
U.S. before 1994), you must submit a pre-market
notification to the FDA at least 75 days before
marketing the product. This was never done
for RTL. If the 75-day pre-market notification
requirement was applicable to this product, it would
look very bad in the eyes of the jury if someone
was claiming injury from a product that was itself
illegal.

When you combine that with NBTY's unsavory
past and present (they are facing a $146 million
fine from the federal government for violations
of the Controlled Substances Act), a jury
would not be likely to feel favorably about
NBTY.

For details about the $146 million, see:
http://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/hotnews/34h18141613.html