"Paul Rooney": after being explained to keep it to private e-mails can't even understand that simple gesture!. the guy's probably more a combination of Welsh, Irish, Scottish and Anglo Saxon yet to his demise states "The only good Welshman is a dead Welshman" Idiotic gutless Moron!
I noticed that Message-ID: <[email hidden]> from nomad contained the following:
Quoted message said:
"Paul Rooney": after being explained to keep it to private e-mails can't even understand that simple gesture!.
I don't blame him, I wouldn't waste my time on you either.
Haven't you got homework to do or something?
-- Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email) It's only Usenet, no one dies. My opinions, not the committee's, mine. Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
"Paul Rooney": after being explained to keep it to private e-mails can't even understand that simple gesture!. the guy's probably more a combination of Welsh, Irish, Scottish and Anglo Saxon yet to his demise states "The only good Welshman is a dead Welshman" Idiotic gutless Moron!
Good night was it Nigel?
-- To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @ where common sense dictates.
Come on, spill the beans, Nomad, what's happened to your brother? Many, believe it or not, miss him.
Even Fran and Bill don't frequent as much now without the old sod.
I'm still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. Neither he nor I have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul were posting.
-- To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @ where common sense dictates.
Come on, spill the beans, Nomad, what's happened to your brother? Many, believe it or not, miss him.
Even Fran and Bill don't frequent as much now without the old sod.
I'm still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
Do you mean Bill Gray? I miss him. Please tell him so.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Peter said:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
>Snip< > still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about
>doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to >feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. > That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?
>Neither he nor I >have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul were >posting. > Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.
>-- >To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @ >where common sense dictates. > Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect him and he takes notice of the 1%.
>> Snip< >> > still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about > >> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was >> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. >> > That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who? > > >> Neither he nor I >> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul >> were posting. >> > Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel. > > > >> -- >> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert >> dots and @ where common sense dictates. >> > Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect > him and he takes notice of the 1%. >
I'm still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
Do you mean Bill Gray? I miss him. Please tell him so.
OK, will do. -- To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @ where common sense dictates.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Peter wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >>> Snip< >>> >> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about >> >>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was >>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. >>> >> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who? >> >> >>> Neither he nor I >>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul >>> were posting. >>> >> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel. >> >> >> >>> -- >>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert >>> dots and @ where common sense dictates. >>> >> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect >> him and he takes notice of the 1%. >> > > What data do you base those figures on? >
> Peter wrote: > >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" >> <[email hidden]> wrote: >> >> >>>> Snip< >>>> >>> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about >>> >>>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was >>>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. >>>> >>> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who? >>> >>> >>>> Neither he nor I >>>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul >>>> were posting. >>>> >>> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel. >>> >>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert >>>> dots and @ where common sense dictates. >>>> >>> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect >>> him and he takes notice of the 1%. >>> >> >> What data do you base those figures on? >> > > Who cares?
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:58:25 +0200, "theo" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
"Peter" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Sandy Birrell said:
Peter wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]> > wrote: > >> Peter wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" >>> <[email hidden]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Snip< >>>>> >>>> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about >>>> >>>>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was >>>>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. >>>>> >>>> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who? >>>> >>>> >>>>> Neither he nor I >>>>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul >>>>> were posting. >>>>> >>>> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert >>>>> dots and @ where common sense dictates. >>>>> >>>> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect >>>> him and he takes notice of the 1%. >>>> >>> >>> What data do you base those figures on? >>> >> >> Who cares? > > How many guesses can we have?
> Peter wrote: > >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" >> <[email hidden]> wrote: >> >> >>>> Snip< >>>> >>> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and >>> about >>> >>>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was >>>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. >>>> >>> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who? >>> >>> >>>> Neither he nor I >>>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul >>>> were posting. >>>> >>> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel. >>> >>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert >>>> dots and @ where common sense dictates. >>>> >>> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect >>> him and he takes notice of the 1%. >>> >> >> What data do you base those figures on? >> > > Who cares?
How many guesses can we have?
352
How did you arrive at that figure?
That's how many posts Bill made to the group from the beginning of the year to April, and also how many replies he got back 🙂 At that time he was fourth in the posters list going by number of days posting, which was 74. Phil Cook was first followed by Fran, Judith and Gordon.
Peter wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]> > wrote: > >> Peter wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" >>> <[email hidden]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Snip< >>>>> >>>> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and >>>> about >>>> >>>>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was >>>>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. >>>>> >>>> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who? >>>> >>>> >>>>> Neither he nor I >>>>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul >>>>> were posting. >>>>> >>>> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert >>>>> dots and @ where common sense dictates. >>>>> >>>> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect >>>> him and he takes notice of the 1%. >>>> >>> >>> What data do you base those figures on? >>> >> >> Who cares? > > How many guesses can we have?
352
How did you arrive at that figure?
That's how many posts Bill made to the group from the beginning of the year to April, and also how many replies he got back 🙂 At that time he was fourth in the posters list going by number of days posting, which was 74. Phil Cook was first followed by Fran, Judith and Gordon.