General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Rooney El Diablo

Started by nomad · · Last activity · 26 posts · 608 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 September 2005
Last activity
15 September 2005
Original author
nomad
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
608
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Paul Rooney":
    after being explained to keep it to private e-mails can't even understand
    that simple gesture!. the guy's probably more a combination of Welsh,
    Irish, Scottish and Anglo Saxon yet to his demise states "The only good
    Welshman is a dead Welshman" Idiotic gutless Moron!

    And with his picture on http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk/urw/mg/mg.html#R
    looking like the weediest weakling on this planet! I wouldn't like to be
    him at this momento. [censored]

  2. I noticed that Message-ID: <[email hidden]> from
    nomad contained the following:

    Quoted message said:

    "Paul Rooney":
    after being explained to keep it to private e-mails can't even understand
    that simple gesture!.

    I don't blame him, I wouldn't waste my time on you either.

    Haven't you got homework to do or something?

    --
    Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
    It's only Usenet, no one dies.
    My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
    Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/

  3. Come on, spill the beans, Nomad, what's happened to your brother? Many,
    believe it or not, miss him.

    Even Fran and Bill don't frequent as much now without the old sod.

    Jhimmy

  4. Well Jhimmy, Thanks for asking and for your concern, I was talking to him
    earlier and basically what I could get out of him was:

    "he's given up since Christmas and is feeling a lot better for it" so it
    just goes to prove one of the points I made in a previous post.

    Nomad
    =====
    "Jhimmy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Come on, spill the beans, Nomad, what's happened to your brother? Many,
    believe it or not, miss him.

    Even Fran and Bill don't frequent as much now without the old sod.

    Jhimmy

  5. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    "Paul Rooney":
    after being explained to keep it to private e-mails can't even understand
    that simple gesture!. the guy's probably more a combination of Welsh,
    Irish, Scottish and Anglo Saxon yet to his demise states "The only good
    Welshman is a dead Welshman" Idiotic gutless Moron!


    Good night was it Nigel?

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  6. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    Come on, spill the beans, Nomad, what's happened to your brother? Many,
    believe it or not, miss him.

    Even Fran and Bill don't frequent as much now without the old sod.


    I'm still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about
    doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to
    feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame. Neither he nor I
    have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul were
    posting.

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  7. Fran said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:


    Come on, spill the beans, Nomad, what's happened to your brother? Many,
    believe it or not, miss him.

    Even Fran and Bill don't frequent as much now without the old sod.


    I'm still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about
    doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to
    feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.

    Do you mean Bill Gray? I miss him. Please tell him so.

    Katherine

  8. Quoted message said:

    Snip<


    still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about

    Quoted message said:

    doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to
    feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.

    That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?

    Quoted message said:

    Neither he nor I
    have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul were
    posting.

    Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

    Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect him and he
    takes notice of the 1%.

    Jhimmy

  9. On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Snip<


    still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about

    Quoted message said:

    doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to
    feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.

    That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?

    Quoted message said:

    Neither he nor I
    have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul were
    posting.

    Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

    Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect him and he
    takes notice of the 1%.

    What data do you base those figures on?

  10. Peter said:

    On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Snip<


    still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about

    Quoted message said:

    doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to
    feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.


    That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?

    Quoted message said:

    Neither he nor I
    have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul were
    posting.


    Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.


    Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect him and he
    takes notice of the 1%.

    What data do you base those figures on?

    Who cares?

    Katherine

  11. On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    >Snip<
    >
    still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about

    >doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to
    >feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
    >
    That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?

    >Neither he nor I
    >have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul were
    >posting.
    >
    Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.

    >--
    >To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    >where common sense dictates.
    >
    Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect him and he
    takes notice of the 1%.

    What data do you base those figures on?

    Who cares?

    How many guesses can we have?

  12. Peter said:

    On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >> Snip<
    >>
    > still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about
    >
    >> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was
    >> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
    >>
    > That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?
    >
    >
    >> Neither he nor I
    >> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul
    >> were posting.
    >>
    > Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.
    >
    >
    >
    >> --
    >> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert
    >> dots and @ where common sense dictates.
    >>
    > Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect
    > him and he takes notice of the 1%.
    >

    What data do you base those figures on?

    Who cares?

    How many guesses can we have?

    352

    --

    Don`t Worry, Be Happy
    Sandy
    --
    E-Mail:- [email hidden]
    Website:- http://www.ftscotland.co.uk
    Looking for a webhost? Try http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=2966019

  13. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about
    doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was made to
    feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.

    Do you mean Bill Gray? I miss him. Please tell him so.


    OK, will do.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  14. "Paul Rooney" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Y'all need to develop thicker skins.

    I must say I find that rather impertinent and slightly on the rude side.

  15. Sandy Birrell said:
    Peter said:

    On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Peter wrote:

    > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy"
    > <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >
    >>> Snip<
    >>>
    >> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about
    >>
    >>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was
    >>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
    >>>
    >> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?
    >>
    >>
    >>> Neither he nor I
    >>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul
    >>> were posting.
    >>>
    >> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>> --
    >>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert
    >>> dots and @ where common sense dictates.
    >>>
    >> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect
    >> him and he takes notice of the 1%.
    >>
    >
    > What data do you base those figures on?
    >

    Who cares?

    How many guesses can we have?

    352

    How did you arrive at that figure?

  16. AndyP said:

    "Paul Rooney" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Y'all need to develop thicker skins.

    I must say I find that rather impertinent and slightly on the rude side.

    The cad.

  17. "Peter" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sandy Birrell said:
    Peter said:

    On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    > Peter wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy"
    >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>> Snip<
    >>>>
    >>> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about
    >>>
    >>>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was
    >>>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
    >>>>
    >>> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> Neither he nor I
    >>>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul
    >>>> were posting.
    >>>>
    >>> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> --
    >>>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert
    >>>> dots and @ where common sense dictates.
    >>>>
    >>> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect
    >>> him and he takes notice of the 1%.
    >>>
    >>
    >> What data do you base those figures on?
    >>
    >
    > Who cares?

    How many guesses can we have?

    352

    How did you arrive at that figure?

    By adding 194 and 158.

    --
    Theo
    www.theosphotos.fotopic.net

  18. On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:58:25 +0200, "theo" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Peter" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sandy Birrell said:

    Peter wrote:
    > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> Peter wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy"
    >>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>> Snip<
    >>>>>
    >>>> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and about
    >>>>
    >>>>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was
    >>>>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
    >>>>>
    >>>> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>> Neither he nor I
    >>>>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul
    >>>>> were posting.
    >>>>>
    >>>> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>> --
    >>>>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert
    >>>>> dots and @ where common sense dictates.
    >>>>>
    >>>> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect
    >>>> him and he takes notice of the 1%.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> What data do you base those figures on?
    >>>
    >>
    >> Who cares?
    >
    > How many guesses can we have?

    352

    How did you arrive at that figure?

    By adding 194

    14

    Quoted message said:

    and 158.

    14. So that's 28 in all. How come!

  19. Peter said:
    Sandy Birrell said:
    Peter said:

    On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    > Peter wrote:
    >
    >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy"
    >> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>> Snip<
    >>>>
    >>> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and
    >>> about
    >>>
    >>>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was
    >>>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
    >>>>
    >>> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> Neither he nor I
    >>>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul
    >>>> were posting.
    >>>>
    >>> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> --
    >>>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert
    >>>> dots and @ where common sense dictates.
    >>>>
    >>> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect
    >>> him and he takes notice of the 1%.
    >>>
    >>
    >> What data do you base those figures on?
    >>
    >
    > Who cares?

    How many guesses can we have?

    352

    How did you arrive at that figure?

    That's how many posts Bill made to the group from the beginning of the year
    to April, and also how many replies he got back 🙂 At that time he was
    fourth in the posters list going by number of days posting, which was 74.
    Phil Cook was first followed by Fran, Judith and Gordon.

    HTH

    --

    Don`t Worry, Be Happy
    Sandy
    --
    E-Mail:- [email hidden]
    Website:- http://www.ftscotland.co.uk
    Looking for a webhost? Try http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=2966019

  20. Sandy Birrell said:
    Peter said:
    Sandy Birrell said:

    Peter wrote:
    > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:50:26 -0700, Katherine <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> Peter wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:30:28 GMT, "Jhimmy"
    >>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>> Snip<
    >>>>>
    >>>> still here, but mainly lurking 'cos I haven't been out and
    >>>> about
    >>>>
    >>>>> doing much walking lately. Bill's not around because he was
    >>>>> made to feel unwelcome, which I thought was rather a shame.
    >>>>>
    >>>> That's news to me Fran. Unwelcome from who?
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>> Neither he nor I
    >>>>> have ever based our posting frequency on whether or not Paul
    >>>>> were posting.
    >>>>>
    >>>> Yes, I know that Fran, I basically wrote it in jest to Nigel.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>> --
    >>>>> To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert
    >>>>> dots and @ where common sense dictates.
    >>>>>
    >>>> Tell Bill to come back onboard, it's a shame when 99% respect
    >>>> him and he takes notice of the 1%.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> What data do you base those figures on?
    >>>
    >>
    >> Who cares?
    >
    > How many guesses can we have?

    352

    How did you arrive at that figure?

    That's how many posts Bill made to the group from the beginning of the year
    to April, and also how many replies he got back 🙂 At that time he was
    fourth in the posters list going by number of days posting, which was 74.
    Phil Cook was first followed by Fran, Judith and Gordon.

    HTH

    It's given me a headache. Where's the way out?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.