Rocky Balboa caught !!

"Callistus Valerius" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I always knew Rocky was a doper.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml

When that story first broke I said to myself, "HGH."

Adriaaaaannnnn!

http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg

Callistus Valerius said:

I always knew Rocky was a doper.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml

Jason Spaceman said:

Adriaaaaannnnn!

http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg

Callistus Valerius said:

I always knew Rocky was a doper.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml

For crying out loud, the guy is short. Maybe he needs HGH.

By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

Phil Holman said:

"Curtis L. Russell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Jason Spaceman said:

Adriaaaaannnnn!

http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg

Callistus Valerius wrote:

> I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
>
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml

For crying out loud, the guy is short. Maybe he needs HGH.

By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.

However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
ape-like goon".

Did he indicate whether he thought that a BAD thing?

"Fred Fredburger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Phil Holman said:

However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
ape-like goon".

Did he indicate whether he thought that a BAD thing?

And yet in the The Lord's of Flatbush he proved to be a great actor. And to
add to that he was also one of the screenwriters for that movie.

It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much smarter, richer and
more successful than you are.

Tom Kunich said:

"Fred Fredburger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Phil Holman said:

However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
ape-like goon".

Did he indicate whether he thought that a BAD thing?

And yet in the The Lord's of Flatbush he proved to be a great actor. And to
add to that he was also one of the screenwriters for that movie.

Seen any movies in this century? He was much better in Cop Land.

Quoted message said:

It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much smarter, richer and
more successful than you are.

It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
with that.

R

"Curtis L. Russell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Jason Spaceman said:

Adriaaaaannnnn!

http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg

Callistus Valerius said:

I always knew Rocky was a doper.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml

For crying out loud, the guy is short. Maybe he needs HGH.

By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.

However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
ape-like goon".

Especially when they are a cumbersome, ape-like goon to begin with :-)

Phil H

In article
<[email hidden]>,

Phil Holman' piholmanc@yourservice said:

"Curtis L. Russell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Jason Spaceman said:

Adriaaaaannnnn!

http://www.dailypeloton.com/article_images/obrien/tdg04/st6/commesso.jpg

Callistus Valerius wrote:

> I always knew Rocky was a doper.....
>
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/13/wsly113.xml

For crying out loud, the guy is short. Maybe he needs HGH.

By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.

However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
ape-like goon".

Especially when they are a cumbersome, ape-like goon to begin with :-)

But he was not a calg to begin with. His first, or one of his first,
screen appearances is in Bananas, where he is a lip jutting little puke
whose face needs slapping.

"RicodJour" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tom Kunich said:

It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much smarter, richer
and
more successful than you are.

It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
with that.

Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is doping. Or
that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something wrong with him - is
it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?

I pass judgement on your own postings, not on what I think that someone
might have said to some reporter who reported it the way he wanted to depict
it.

And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel about
5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components that were
second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain English until a
shop owner asked him to leave and never return.

In article <[email hidden]>, "Phil Holman"

piholmanc@yourservice said:

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"RicodJour" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tom Kunich wrote:
> It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much smarter,
> richer and
> more successful than you are.

It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
with that.

Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is
doping. Or that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something
wrong with him - is it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?

I pass judgement on your own postings, not on what I think that
someone might have said to some reporter who reported it the way he
wanted to depict it.

And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel
about 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear,
components that were second rate in 1988 and the inability to
understand plain English until a shop owner asked him to leave and
never return.

Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
just so we don't tread on your toes.

Oh, that changes by the minute, Phil. Depending on who *he's* running
down. Oh, can you even begin to figure out what the hell that last graf of
his means? Bizarre stuff.

--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Michael Press said:

Phil Holman' piholmanc@yourservice said:

Quoted message said:

By the time he is 70, he could be, oh, maybe 5 foot five or six.

Quoted message said:

However his official website features a 1991 interview in which he is
quoted as saying that the use of steroids could produce "a cumbersome,
ape-like goon".

Quoted message said:

Especially when they are a cumbersome, ape-like goon to begin with :-)

But he was not a calg to begin with. His first, or one of his first,
screen appearances is in Bananas, where he is a lip jutting little puke
whose face needs slapping.

I was just thinking of that appearance. Even as a
little puke, he's still bigger than Woody Allen, although
Woody briefly gets the better of him in that scene.

Ben

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"RicodJour" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tom Kunich said:

It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much smarter,
richer and
more successful than you are.

It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
with that.

Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is
doping. Or that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something
wrong with him - is it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?

I pass judgement on your own postings, not on what I think that
someone might have said to some reporter who reported it the way he
wanted to depict it.

And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel
about 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear,
components that were second rate in 1988 and the inability to
understand plain English until a shop owner asked him to leave and
never return.

Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
just so we don't tread on your toes.

Phil H

"Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, "Phil Holman"

piholmanc@yourservice said:

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"RicodJour" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Tom Kunich wrote:
>> It sure seems to peeve you guys when someone is so much smarter,
>> richer and
>> more successful than you are.
>
> It's nice to know you hold your assumed projections to be of higher
> quality than those of other people. Not that there's anything wrong
> with that.

Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is
doping. Or that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something
wrong with him - is it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?

I pass judgement on your own postings, not on what I think that
someone might have said to some reporter who reported it the way he
wanted to depict it.

And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel
about 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear,
components that were second rate in 1988 and the inability to
understand plain English until a shop owner asked him to leave and
never return.

Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
just so we don't tread on your toes.

Oh, that changes by the minute, Phil. Depending on who *he's* running
down. Oh, can you even begin to figure out what the hell that last graf of
his means? Bizarre stuff.

I was figuring on running a picture of you Kveck - should I include how many
miles you rode last year?

"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

And yet the bozos who never raced and hardly ride will post here about
racing until their dying days. I even met one of you - a little weazel
about 5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components
that were second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain
English until a shop owner asked him to leave and never return.

Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
just so we don't tread on your toes.

Why would you need something like that Phil? You generally aren't one to run
people down in order to make yourself feel superior.

In article <[email hidden]>, "Tom

Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

"Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, "Phil Holman"
<piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Nice one Tom. Can we have your list of people we can and cannot belittle
just so we don't tread on your toes.

Oh, that changes by the minute, Phil. Depending on who *he's* running
down. Oh, can you even begin to figure out what the hell that last graf of
his means? Bizarre stuff.

I was figuring on running a picture of you Kveck - should I include how many
miles you rode last year?

Ahhh, now we understand. It's all about BIG Tom and the flotilla of
bicycles that're in his garage and don't you forget it! Because having a
lot of bikes and claiming to ride a lot of miles makes you a BIGGER man,
if you know what I mean. It also makes you right in any discussion. Huh,
seems like you were saying just a few days ago that "Speed and distance
aren't important."

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/60542d4b79f0c0a4?hl

--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is doping. Or
that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something wrong with him - is
it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?

I for one clearly remember being lectured by you on the impossibility of
winning 5 TdF w/o being on the juice. Of course at the time (1996 or
1997) we were arguing about Miguel Indurain. Of course once LA started
winning the Tour you switched to the "drugs have no effect on
performance" line.

jyh.

"Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ahhh, now we understand. It's all about BIG Tom and the flotilla of
bicycles that're in his garage and don't you forget it!

Actually no - it's about SMALL Kveck and how he has a need to belittle
others in order to make himself feel valuable.

If you ain't got your own, you ain't got nothing.

"jean-yves hervé" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

Yet you don't see me telling everyone how someone I don't know is doping.
Or
that some old guy that wants to take hGH has something wrong with him -
is
it illegal for Stallone to take hGH?

I for one clearly remember being lectured by you on the impossibility of
winning 5 TdF w/o being on the juice. Of course at the time (1996 or
1997) we were arguing about Miguel Indurain. Of course once LA started
winning the Tour you switched to the "drugs have no effect on
performance" line.

Unless you want me saying that you have a faulty memory perhaps you ought to
cite the postings in which you think I said that.

"Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"RicodJour" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

I even met one of you - a little weazel about

Quoted message said:

5'4" tall with a bike with a rack on it front and rear, components that

were

Quoted message said:

second rate in 1988 and the inability to understand plain English until a
shop owner asked him to leave and never return.

Tom, I thought that you promised not to memtion that in public. Besides I
am
5'-5" tall

Charles, you have a sense of humor, something that the gang-posters here
don't. Being short in stature isn't the same as being short on character.