"Jon Senior" <jon_AT_restlesslemon_DOTco_DOT_uk> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Mark South [email hidden] opined the following...
Quoted message said:The rats would not care. They'd carry on destroying 60% of crops and
damaging
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:the rest in storage.
So you use the money to build better stores. That solves one problem.
Do you know how hard/expensive it is to build a rodent-proof store?
Quoted message said:Presumably we must have a similar problem in the developed world, yet we
don't starve!
Now you've made me hungry.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I think that for humans to criticise any animal for damaging
biodiversity is hypocrisy on a grand scale. Rabbits in Australia? The
Dodo? Smallpox? We don't hold a good track record on leaving no mark.
No, we don't. And spreading rats is a lot worse than introducing Rabbits to
Oz
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:was.
But on a par with our ability to commit genocide. Smallpox is
significant because if the small stocks currently held in research labs
are destroyed it'll be the first time that humanity has intentionally
destroyed a species, as apposed to not looking where we tread.
But if it makes some people aware that we are walking on eggs that's a good
thing.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:That description applies equally (If not more so) to humans. Lovely
chaps indeed.
I've already given you a list to chant of humans that need to be knocked
off.
Quoted message said:
In another thread? I think I know the one. I just think it's dangerous
to criticise animals for doing similar things to man without
simultaneously acknowledging our contributions.
There are two sides to the situation, but you find yourself firmly on one of
them and it's difficult to change sides at this stage :-)
--
"Mango sorbet is clearcut proof that we have progressed beyond the
bare needs of survival and have progressed to the transcendant."
- Marc Goodman in talk.bizarre