Quoted post said:Originally Posted by Ken81 [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]
BTW, for the 50cm frame the differences:
48cm - top tube is 515mm, head tube is 110mm
50cm - top tube is 525mm, head tube is 110mm
52cm - top tube is 535mm, head tube is 140mm
FYI. The data is interesting, but possibly NOT meaningful UNLESS you know-or-feel that you are REALLY UNCOMFORTABLE on the current frame AND the dealer is going to swap the bike frames for a minimal ('I' would say $50 would be beyond reasonable) or for FREE ...
- for an additional 1cm in top tube length, I would simply get a 110mm stem
- or, if the stem is already 110mm long, then get a 120mm stem
- BUT FIRST, you need to level the handlebar drops + re-orient the levers, if necessary otherwise whatever changes you might make will be almost meaningless in the long run
BTW. It looks as though the stem on your current frame is only about 100mm long ...
If so, then the combined top tube + stem is only in the 525mm range -- of course, possibly longer if the stem is longer.
- the combined top tube + stem length does have an effect on the rider's comfort
- but, for ANY given rider, a lower stem height offsets the shorter stem & top tube length
- or, conversely, a taller stem can be offset by having a longer stem & top tube length
- OR, to reiterate my earlier statement, to some extent the frame size is cosmetic
FWIW. I am 175cm tall. My preferred frame is 52cm with a 54.5cm top tube + a 120mm stem ...
- probably more by chance, that is essentially the same top tube + stem length as I had decades ago ...
- but, top tube + stem length are not the only factors in sizing
I have more than one bike. My other bikes -- regardless of the frame size and/or its top tube length and/or handlebar width-and-reach -- are set up very close in overall distance between the REAR of the saddle (a seemingly arbitrary point from which I make the measurement ... but, that is where my butt is located) to the rear of the horns on the brake levers (i.e., where my hands reach to) -- the difference is less than an inch on the diagonal (aka "hypotenuse"😉 so the longitudinal difference is even smaller ...
- the point is that regardless of a bike's frame size, it is fairly easy for me to set up a 'new' frame for ME to ride and have it feel the same underneath me if it is within a few inches (+/-) of the frame size I normally ride
THAT's possibly a long way of saying that the frame isn't necessarily too small for YOU, but YOU need to decide if you are actually uncomfortable AND if changing the stem's length to 110mm-or-120mm will be beneficial, or not ...
OR, move a spacer-or-two from beneath the stem to between the top cap & stem (really!) to see if the net sizing effect as a longer stem affects how the bike feels (i.e., less cramped ... if THAT is the problem)
So, if the frame size is a cosmetic issue then you will want to know the trendy people who are not racing typically choose a smaller frame size than most of the rest of us might choose to ride and so you will be right in step with them with your current frame size.