Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Ritchey 1" Steel Fork?

Started by DougA · · Last activity · 18 posts · 1,017 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 June 2007
Last activity
8 June 2007
Original author
DougA
Posts
18
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,017
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–18 of 18
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    douga

  2. DougA said:

    I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    douga


    a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    alarmingly so.

    try experimenting with carbon handlebars and double-wrap bar tape if you
    can't get an appropriate carbon fork.

  3. DougA said:

    I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    Getting your bars higher is often a good fix. Are the bars pretty low
    now? Tire size and pressure are also worth reconsidering.

  4. DougA said:

    I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    Or a wider tire.
    Or change your riding position to have less pressure on your hands.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  5. jim beam said:

    a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    alarmingly so.

    How would that flex manifest itself? I think my bike with 1" aluminum
    steer tube is stiffer than my bike with a 1 1/8" steel steer tube, but
    there are obviously other factors at play that make it tough to isolate
    the effect of the steer tube.

    --
    Dave
    dvt at psu dot edu

  6. dvt said:
    jim beam said:

    a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    alarmingly so.

    How would that flex manifest itself? I think my bike with 1" aluminum
    steer tube is stiffer than my bike with a 1 1/8" steel steer tube, but
    there are obviously other factors at play that make it tough to isolate
    the effect of the steer tube.


    it's apparent if you try different forks in the same frame, which is
    what i did. all-time worst was the reynolds. i now use an old look
    with steel steerer. superb. another good feeling one was the kestrel,
    also with steel steerer. unfortunately the chinese ones start to crack
    in no time.

    a good comparative test is to sit the top tube, hold the brake and rock
    back and forth. doing that test with the wheel at 90 degrees is
    interesting too. lateral wheel flex comes into it of course, but if you
    use the same wheel, and difference is all fork. interesting differences.

  7. jim beam said:
    dvt said:
    jim beam said:

    a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    alarmingly so.

    How would that flex manifest itself? I think my bike with 1" aluminum
    steer tube is stiffer than my bike with a 1 1/8" steel steer tube, but
    there are obviously other factors at play that make it tough to
    isolate the effect of the steer tube.


    it's apparent if you try different forks in the same frame, which is
    what i did. all-time worst was the reynolds. i now use an old look
    with steel steerer. superb. another good feeling one was the kestrel,
    also with steel steerer. unfortunately the chinese ones start to crack
    in no time.

    I don't have more than one fork to use, and I don't think it's worth my
    time to run the experiment. So I guess I'll never know unless my current
    fork poops out.

    My fork is an Easton EC50 or something like that. It's the cheapest
    Easton from several years back. I'm surprised that flexibility in the
    steer tube would be quite noticeable, since it's braced at the top and
    bottom by the headset. The steer tube of the Easton has a much thicker
    wall than any steel steer tube I've used, but wall thickness isn't as
    important as modulus and OD when you calculate the bending stiffness of
    the tube.

    Quoted message said:

    a good comparative test is to sit the top tube, hold the brake and
    rock back and forth. doing that test with the wheel at 90 degrees is
    interesting too. lateral wheel flex comes into it of course, but if
    you use the same wheel, and difference is all fork. interesting
    differences.

    Funny... I was doing that at a stoplight this morning on my commuter
    bike (steel frame & fork) prior to reading your post. That bike has a
    lot of flex during that test. I think my carbon fork/aluminum
    steerer/aluminum frame bike has less front end flex, but there are
    plenty of other differences too (i.e. fatter tyres on the commuter bike).

    --
    Dave
    dvt at psu dot edu

  8. DougA said:


    I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    Not as well as 35-38mm tires with 60psi. You'd be surprised how fast
    tires can be when they're not jolting you, too.

    Chalo

  9. I should have mentioned that I am running 23c tires at 120 psi--the speed
    and rolling resistance is not something that I will compromise on. I have
    spoke to our LBS and they are going to install Specialized Bar Phat for me.
    I have my fingers crossed...

    "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    DougA said:


    I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy
    ashphalt.

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    Not as well as 35-38mm tires with 60psi. You'd be surprised how fast
    tires can be when they're not jolting you, too.

    Chalo

  10. DougA said:

    I should have mentioned that I am running 23c tires at 120 psi--the speed
    and rolling resistance is not something that I will compromise on.

    Are you racing? If not, enjoy the petard.

  11. DougA said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy
    ashphalt.

    and

    Quoted message said:

    I should have mentioned that I am running 23c tires at 120 psi--the speed
    and rolling resistance is not something that I will compromise on.

    Have you considered where the energy to pound your forearms is coming
    from? That's right, your forward motion. Hard tires are fastest on
    very smooth, unbroken surfaces, but on surfaces that could be
    described as "bumpy asphalt", you lose more speed by getting kidney
    punched than you would from the rolling resistance in fatter, softer
    tires.

    Consider that MTB racers can run whatever pressures they want in the
    pursuit of winning races, but they usually use between 25-45psi if
    their bikes are unsuspended. A compliant tire can restore most of a
    bump's energy to your forward motion, but an uncompliant tire sinks
    that energy by jolting it into your body.

    Your arms are an indicator of wasted energy-- you can go faster with
    softer tires. Take it or leave it, but don't fool yourself.

    Chalo

  12. DougA said:

    I should have mentioned that I am running 23c tires at 120 psi--the speed
    and rolling resistance is not something that I will compromise on.

    The "speed and rolling resistance" may not be what you think they are.
    If you can borrow/try some wider tires, or a set of wheels fitted with
    wider tires, do so. Run the wider tires at a lower pressure.

    Or just try lowering the pressure in your extant front tire. If you
    can get by (i.e., no pinch flats) with 120PSI in the rear, you do not
    need 120PSI in the front. Try 105, see how it feels.

    Quoted message said:

    I have
    spoke to our LBS and they are going to install Specialized Bar Phat for me.
    I have my fingers crossed...

    Quoted message said:


    "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    DougA wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy
    ashphalt.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    Quoted message said:

    Not as well as 35-38mm tires with 60psi. You'd be surprised how fast
    tires can be when they're not jolting you, too.

    Quoted message said:

    Chalo- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

  13. jim beam said:
    DougA said:

    I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    douga


    a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    alarmingly so.

    I'm surprised to hear you say so, given that your position in other
    threads has been that the curl of a fork at the ends is a more important
    factor in a fork's flexibility than bending at the fork crown.

    Quoted message said:

    try experimenting with carbon handlebars and double-wrap bar tape if you
    can't get an appropriate carbon fork.

  14. Gary Young said:
    jim beam said:
    DougA said:

    I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?

    I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.

    Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?

    douga


    a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    alarmingly so.

    I'm surprised to hear you say so, given that your position in other
    threads has been that the curl of a fork at the ends is a more important
    factor in a fork's flexibility than bending at the fork crown.

    doug asked: "Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?" to which i
    replied: "a little". since the question addresses material, "carbon",
    why should my response address anything else?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    try experimenting with carbon handlebars and double-wrap bar tape if you
    can't get an appropriate carbon fork.

  15. jim beam said:
    Gary Young said:
    jim beam said:

    DougA wrote:
    > I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    > steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?
    >
    > I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.
    >
    > Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?
    >
    > douga
    >
    >
    a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    alarmingly so.

    I'm surprised to hear you say so, given that your position in other
    threads has been that the curl of a fork at the ends is a more important
    factor in a fork's flexibility than bending at the fork crown.

    doug asked: "Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?" to which i
    replied: "a little". since the question addresses material, "carbon",
    why should my response address anything else?

    To be more exact, his question was about a carbon fork, not necessarily
    about what material the steerer is made of. That's something you brought
    up. The fact that you did so suggests that you are inconsistent in the
    importance you give to bending at the crown versus the curl of the fork
    end. Regardless of whether the OP brought it up or not, I'd like to hear
    your thoughts on which is more important and why.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    try experimenting with carbon handlebars and double-wrap bar tape if you
    can't get an appropriate carbon fork.

  16. Gary Young said:
    jim beam said:
    Gary Young said:

    On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:03:03 -0700, jim beam wrote:

    > DougA wrote:
    >> I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    >> steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?
    >>
    >> I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.
    >>
    >> Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?
    >>
    >> douga
    >>
    >>
    > a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    > can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    > alarmingly so.
    >
    I'm surprised to hear you say so, given that your position in other
    threads has been that the curl of a fork at the ends is a more important
    factor in a fork's flexibility than bending at the fork crown.


    doug asked: "Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?" to which i
    replied: "a little". since the question addresses material, "carbon",
    why should my response address anything else?

    To be more exact, his question was about a carbon fork, not necessarily
    about what material the steerer is made of.

    er, read the op's post one more time gary.

    Quoted message said:

    That's something you brought
    up. The fact that you did so suggests that you are inconsistent in the
    importance you give to bending at the crown versus the curl of the fork
    end. Regardless of whether the OP brought it up or not, I'd like to hear
    your thoughts on which is more important and why.

    below a certain comprehension threshold, answers become a complete waste
    of freakin' time.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > try experimenting with carbon handlebars and double-wrap bar tape if you
    > can't get an appropriate carbon fork.

  17. jim beam said:
    Gary Young said:
    jim beam said:

    Gary Young wrote:
    > On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:03:03 -0700, jim beam wrote:
    >
    >> DougA wrote:
    >>> I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    >>> steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?
    >>>
    >>> I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.
    >>>
    >>> Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?
    >>>
    >>> douga
    >>>
    >>>
    >> a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    >> can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    >> alarmingly so.
    >>
    > I'm surprised to hear you say so, given that your position in other
    > threads has been that the curl of a fork at the ends is a more important
    > factor in a fork's flexibility than bending at the fork crown.
    doug asked: "Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?" to which i
    replied: "a little". since the question addresses material, "carbon",
    why should my response address anything else?

    To be more exact, his question was about a carbon fork, not necessarily
    about what material the steerer is made of.

    er, read the op's post one more time gary.

    OK, done. Mentions carbon fork but not the steerer material. Are you not
    aware that carbon forks come with various steerer materials?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    That's something you brought
    up. The fact that you did so suggests that you are inconsistent in the
    importance you give to bending at the crown versus the curl of the fork
    end. Regardless of whether the OP brought it up or not, I'd like to
    hear your thoughts on which is more important and why.

    below a certain comprehension threshold, answers become a complete waste
    of freakin' time.

    In other words, you don't have a good answer.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> try experimenting with carbon handlebars and double-wrap bar tape if
    >> you can't get an appropriate carbon fork.

  18. Gary Young said:
    jim beam said:
    Gary Young said:

    On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 05:53:12 -0700, jim beam wrote:

    > Gary Young wrote:
    >> On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:03:03 -0700, jim beam wrote:
    >>
    >>> DougA wrote:
    >>>> I recently built up a Ritchey SwissCross frame with its original 1 inch
    >>>> steel fork. At the price of the frame it must be ChrMo?
    >>>>
    >>>> I love the bike but my forearms are taking a pounding over bumpy ashphalt.
    >>>>
    >>>> Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?
    >>>>
    >>>> douga
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>> a little. but running a 1" steerer tube in anything other than steel
    >>> can be sketchy. 1" carbon tends to be too flexible, 1" aluminum
    >>> alarmingly so.
    >>>
    >> I'm surprised to hear you say so, given that your position in other
    >> threads has been that the curl of a fork at the ends is a more important
    >> factor in a fork's flexibility than bending at the fork crown.
    > doug asked: "Would a carbon bar, stem or fork easy my pain?" to which i
    > replied: "a little". since the question addresses material, "carbon",
    > why should my response address anything else?
    >
    >
    To be more exact, his question was about a carbon fork, not necessarily
    about what material the steerer is made of.


    er, read the op's post one more time gary.

    OK, done. Mentions carbon fork but not the steerer material. Are you not
    aware that carbon forks come with various steerer materials?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    That's something you brought
    up. The fact that you did so suggests that you are inconsistent in the
    importance you give to bending at the crown versus the curl of the fork
    end. Regardless of whether the OP brought it up or not, I'd like to
    hear your thoughts on which is more important and why.


    below a certain comprehension threshold, answers become a complete waste
    of freakin' time.

    In other words, you don't have a good answer.

    i have many good answers gary, but not for someone that's got conceptual
    issues preventing them from differentiating between form and substance.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    >>> try experimenting with carbon handlebars and double-wrap bar tape if
    >>> you can't get an appropriate carbon fork.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.