General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Risk Control Still a Problem for Diabetics
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 22 January 2004
- Last activity
- 26 January 2004
- Original author
- Marshall
- Posts
- 9
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 511
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Marshall said:
story.news.yahoo.comnewsOpen ↗ /diabetes_risk_dcInteresting article, thank you. What it appears to suggest is that many diabetics are either ill-
educated about DM, uncaring, or plain stupid. Thankfully we on the MGs are not like that, but we are
only a tiny fraction - less than 0.001%.How do we get the message out, I wonder?
Al.
-
Al Hardy said:
Marshall wrote:
Quoted message said:
story.news.yahoo.comnewsOpen ↗ /diabetes_risk_dc
Quoted message said:
Interesting article, thank you. What it appears to suggest is that many diabetics are either ill-
educated about DM, uncaring, or plain stupid. Thankfully we on the MGs are not like that, but we
are only a tiny fraction - less than 0.001%. How do we get the message out, I wonder? Al.Why bother? the uncaring don't care. The plain stupid would not comprehend and the ill educated
clearly have not got 1/2 an ounce of gumption and are probably better grouped amongst the other two.If you find you have something wrong with you then either you want to survive or seek a resolution
or you do not.Pete
Diagnosed 20/03/03 Type II D&E + Metformin + Gliclazide
+ Asprin 210lbs at Dx to BMI 166lbs achieved. To mail: aspen at freeuk.com -
"Al Hardy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Marshall said:
story.news.yahoo.comnewsOpen ↗Quoted message said:
/diabetes_risk_dc
Interesting article, thank you. What it appears to suggest is that many diabetics are either ill-
educated about DM, uncaring, or plain stupid. Thankfully we on the MGs are not like that, but we
are only a tiny fraction - less than 0.001%.How do we get the message out, I wonder?
What'd be the point Al? If the message was nailed to every door of every diabetics house, they'd
STILL bury their collective heads in the sand and pretend it's not serious and it's not going to
affect their everyday lives.YOU know that's true too.
Beav
Quoted message said:
Al. -
"Al Hardy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
Interesting article, thank you. What it appears to suggest is that many diabetics are either ill-
educated about DM, uncaring, or plain stupid.The article talks about data from NHANES - National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which
seems to me as a collection of different health and statistical data from a statistical sample of US
population. So it was not directly aimed on peaple with diabetes. The result then is more relevant
for type 2 diabetes, as 90% of diabetics in population are type 2.I would just like to see similar comparisom for type 1 diabetics. The possibility, that the result
of todays treatment is the same as it was 10 years ago seems to me too pesimistic... Or does the
today's frequent BG monitoring affect the health at all???Igor
-
Marshall said:
story.news.yahoo.comnewsOpen ↗ _nm/diabetes_risk_dc
I think this shows that MOST diabetics are not practising good control and that many risk
assessments of Diabetes are skewed and do not reflect the positive aspects of good control,
especially when related to insurance, etc.I think diabetics in good control get a bum rap because most risk assessments are performed using
data from such studies and do not differentiate between good and bad control. -
"gman99" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Marshall said:
story.news.yahoo.comnewsOpen ↗Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
_nm/diabetes_risk_dc
I think this shows that MOST diabetics are not practising good control and that many risk
assessments of Diabetes are skewed and do not reflect the positive aspects of good control,
especially when related to insurance, etc.Actually, you'll probably find that most diabetics don't think at all (about diabetes, control or
future "developments"😉Quoted message said:
I think diabetics in good control get a bum rap because most risk assessments are performed using
data from such studies and do not differentiate between good and bad control.Diabetics in god control don't NEED data from studies. They use their meters and eat/exercise
accordingly.Beav
-
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:09:33 -0000, "Beav"
<[email hidden]> posted:Quoted message said:
Diabetics in god control don't NEED data from studies. They use their meters and eat/exercise
accordingly.And pray? <giggle>
Quoted message said:
Beav
Peace, Linda
Bushisms: "I've got very good relations with President Mubarak and Crown Prince Abdallah and the
King of Jordan, Gulf Coast countries." -George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., May 29, 2003Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet /server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk
More info: diabetic-talk.orgdiabetic-talk.orgOpen ↗ -
"Dazey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:09:33 -0000, "Beav" <[email hidden]> posted:
Quoted message said:
Diabetics in god control don't NEED data from studies. They use their
metersQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
and eat/exercise accordingly.
And pray? <giggle>
Some even do that, not that it helps:-)
Beav
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.