Rife Machine Research

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

From: Tsu Dho Nimh [email hidden]
Who was the third party, and when did they do this? How
independent were they? Where is the data, including the design
for the scope? Do you have a published reference? A URL?

When my electron microscope needs service I call in a tech.

ROFL Did I miss the part where you identified the independent third party
you claimed performed the study?

Quoted message said:

Nah, wouldn't interest them at all. The electron microscope works far

better

Quoted message said:

and has much higher resolution. Rifes's device was meant for use with

living

Quoted message said:

samples

Like viruses? You claim that they aren't living.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Any proof it does? What is the "resonance" of a virus?

Rife was wrong here ( in my opinion ). Viral particles exist, but are

never

Quoted message said:

alive.

So the claims that you believe you really disbelieve. OK. Drop the taco
and raise your hands.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

If Rife's machine worked as its adherents claim, that means that
much of the physics and chemistry that is currently in use today
must be wrong

Not quite. We just haven't caught up to Rife's understanding. He

extended the

Quoted message said:

boundaries of science and physics.

No. he made a mistake and misinterpreted what he saw.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

So where is it, so that we can continue his work?

How many more people would you think would be willing to sacrifice their

hard

Quoted message said:

earned career or even suffer death, like some of those before them, who
championed Rife and his work?

Summary:

You have no theory that explains Rife's claims.

You have no evidence that the claims are true.

You have a paranoid delusion that the reason for the above is the result of
a vast conspiracy.

Nothing if not consistent.

le moo

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rife Machine Research
From: "Happy Dog" [email hidden]
Date: 12/5/2003 7:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"DRCEEPHD" <[email hidden]> wrote in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

From: Tsu Dho Nimh [email hidden]
Who was the third party, and when did they do this? How
independent were they? Where is the data, including the design
for the scope? Do you have a published reference? A URL?

When my electron microscope needs service I call in a tech.

ROFL Did I miss the part where you identified the independent third party
you claimed performed the study?

Quoted message said:

Nah, wouldn't interest them at all. The electron microscope works far

better

Quoted message said:

and has much higher resolution. Rifes's device was meant for use with

living

Quoted message said:

samples

Like viruses? You claim that they aren't living.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Any proof it does? What is the "resonance" of a virus?

Rife was wrong here ( in my opinion ). Viral particles exist, but are

never

Quoted message said:

alive.

So the claims that you believe you really disbelieve. OK. Drop the taco
and raise your hands.

le moo

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

If Rife's machine worked as its adherents claim, that means that

Quoted message said:

much of the physics and chemistry that is currently in use today
must be wrong

Not quite. We just haven't caught up to Rife's understanding. He

extended the

Quoted message said:

boundaries of science and physics.

Quoted message said:

No. he made a mistake and misinterpreted what he saw.

*In your opinion*

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

So where is it, so that we can continue his work?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

How many more people would you think would be willing to sacrifice their

hard

Quoted message said:

earned career or even suffer death, like some of those before them, who
championed Rife and his work?

Summary:

Quoted message said:

You have no theory that explains Rife's claims.

You have no evidence that the claims are true.

Do show *your* proof that he made a mistake and misinterpreted what he saw.

Quoted message said:

You have a paranoid delusion that the reason for the above is the result of
a vast conspiracy.

ZZzz.

Delusional,, credibility,, low self esteem,, narcissistic, , complete
fool,,dysfunctional thinking, ,pathologic,, hypocrisy,, anxiety attacks,,
reading comphrension, ,little insight,, don't think highly of yourself,, the
person making the claim is lying,, the major problems of this newsgroup,,
incredible story,, self image,, difficult for you to understand,, your own
intolerance,, ridig idelogous,, they often act,,

Quoted message said:

Nothing if not consistent.

Touche.

Arf.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rife Machine Research
From: Tsu Dho Nimh [email hidden]
Date: 12/4/03 8:33 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Rife's claimed "science" violates many of the well-understood
principles of optics, phsucs, and biology.

Uhmmm...TDN. Rife’s microscope was tested and verified by an independent
third party to exceed the known limits of optical microscopy. Why must we
argue that this data does not exit and the microscope did not perform as
advertised?

Quoted message said:

What I do not entirely understand is how the rife

Quoted message said:

beam tube achieves resonance with a virus? \

It doesn't.

Any proof?

Any proof? What about your proof, Charles? Where is your proof of Pasteur's
deathbed confession? What is the name of the biographer, the name of the book
he wrote, or the exact words that Pastuer allegedly said? Where is the
independent proof of the Rife scope? Got an answer for either of these two
cornerstones of your farcical belief system?

Anth said:

Then how can virus be stained then?

The virus particles are not stained. They are photographed with a
scanning electron microscope and colors are applied ot the
picture.

Tsu Dho Nimh

--
When businesses invoke the "protection of consumers," it's a lot like
politicians invoking morality and children - grab your wallet and/or
your kid and run for your life.

(Charles) said:

Greetings, I have been researching rife's principles of curing
pathogens from the body, and I find it fascinating. The problem I am
currently facing is that there does not exist enough "actual" science
behind the principles. Why haven't people done research into the
physical and biological principles behind rife's research?

There is a lot of sites on the internet involved with Rife that
degrade its potential scientific validity, but at the same time I have
read about credible institutions doing related research.

I understand the operation of the machine, since this is well
documented online. What I do not entirely understand is how the rife
beam tube achieves resonance with a virus? Approximately what
wavelength of light is being used in a rife tube? Is this enough to
penetrate skin even? Do there exist calculations that correlate the
forced electromagnetic/acoustic/quantum/whatever response of a virus
to any of the viruses physical properties?

My own scientific training is still rather limited, but these kinds of
questions come to mind. Any help pointing me in the right direction
would be greatly appreciated.

Hello,

You might find these sites interesting.

http://www.rife.de/
http://www.rife.org/

They have links to companies in Europe that manufacture and use the Rife
principals to treat many things. They also have some research.

Good luck,
Steve
My real email address is dealsgalore[A-T]earthlink.net

www.cheap-land.com

On 4 Dec 2003 16:11:21 -0800, [email hidden] (Charles) wrote:

<<snip>>

Quoted message said:

My own scientific training is still rather limited, but these kinds of
questions come to mind. Any help pointing me in the right direction
would be greatly appreciated.

Hi again,

I just thought you'd like to know. A few days ago I heard an ad on the radio for
a free video tape of Rife. I called and ordered it. I rec'd it today and it's
very good.

It they are still sending them for free, the number is 888-486-4420.

I have nothing to so with this company. Just thought others would be interested.

Steve
My real email address is dealsgalore[A-T]earthlink.net

www.cheap-land.com