Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Reusing Quick Links?

Started by Zog The Undeniable · · Last activity · 16 posts · 1,281 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
15 June 2005
Last activity
22 June 2005
Original author
Zog The Undeniable
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,281
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (PeteCresswell) said:

    Seems like there's been a thread on this before, but I can't recall a clear
    conclusion.

    I've been going through SRAM PC48's for a couple years now and mostly throwing
    out the used quicklinks.

    Lately been fooling around with larger chainwheels so have had to splice in an
    extra linke or two.

    That got me thinking that it might be nice to have a little box of extra links
    laying around at no extra cost.

    So: has anybody been reusing these things with impunity?

    Yes, but they can be bought separately for small change, so why bother?

  2. The SRAM links are a licensed version of the Craig's SuperLink. I have
    not seen a Craig's package in a while but they used to say that the
    link should last through about two chains, in other words, it wore a
    bit more slowly than the standard chain link. Not sure if the
    materials in the SRAM are equivalent and that is true, but I would be
    tempted to try to reuse one on a second chain but not with 'impunity'.

    - rick

  3. Seems like there's been a thread on this before, but I can't recall a clear
    conclusion.

    I've been going through SRAM PC48's for a couple years now and mostly throwing
    out the used quicklinks.

    Lately been fooling around with larger chainwheels so have had to splice in an
    extra linke or two.

    That got me thinking that it might be nice to have a little box of extra links
    laying around at no extra cost.

    So: has anybody been reusing these things with impunity?
    --
    PeteCresswell

  4. (PeteCresswell) said:

    Seems like there's been a thread on this before, but I can't recall a clear
    conclusion.

    I've been going through SRAM PC48's for a couple years now and mostly throwing
    out the used quicklinks.

    Lately been fooling around with larger chainwheels so have had to splice in an
    extra linke or two.

    That got me thinking that it might be nice to have a little box of extra links
    laying around at no extra cost.

    So: has anybody been reusing these things with impunity?
    --
    PeteCresswell

    They wear just like a chain link. Broken chains really hurt. I would
    not, do not reuse them.

  5. (PeteCresswell) said:

    Seems like there's been a thread on this before, but I can't recall a clear
    conclusion.

    I've been going through SRAM PC48's for a couple years now and mostly throwing
    out the used quicklinks.

    Lately been fooling around with larger chainwheels so have had to splice in an
    extra linke or two.

    That got me thinking that it might be nice to have a little box of extra links
    laying around at no extra cost.

    So: has anybody been reusing these things with impunity?
    --
    PeteCresswell

    Others have suggested keeping a used quick link in your saddlebag as an
    easy way to reconnect a broken chain if that should occur. Emergency
    use only for you or others you may be riding with. My latest quick
    links are $2.95 after the various discounts. New chain, new quick
    link. Or if you buy SRAM chains, the quick link comes as part of the
    price.

  6. well, i guess it depends on how often yawl clean your chain, how gritty
    it gets while running, blah blah blah
    when new chain time comes, take a look at the links shafts! is one side
    thinner than the other?
    is there a ledge worn into the shaft's middle?
    is it time to change your socks?
    then, on the other hand, we could say that some links are worn more
    than other links.
    this may or not be true depending on your point of view
    but in general our opinion rests on the idea that some chain links are
    reusable under some conditions
    1. poverty
    2. a UPS strike
    3. the lbs really doesn't like you
    4. you went an invested in tweo connex links and can't get your lazy

    expletive deleted together to file the little expletive delted
    down to spec
    5. you threw away the used links-seven years worth. boy are you
    stupid. you
    don't throw stuff away.that's your first mistake. but i doubt
    it.

    there are two other factors to consider or implement: a) some chain
    links runs are better than others, and c)road grit conditions change
    wioth the seasons.

    i hope this is of some help.

  7. Per [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    if the
    materials in the SRAM are equivalent and that is true, but I would be
    tempted to try to reuse one on a second chain but not with 'impunity'.

    I think I'm going with the SRAM leaflet: "Always use a new Power Link when
    fitting a new chain...."

    Probably the lawyers talking, but in view of the potential consequences....
    --
    PeteCresswell

  8. On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:38:41 -0700, "(PeteCresswell)" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Seems like there's been a thread on this before, but I can't recall a clear
    conclusion.

    I've been going through SRAM PC48's for a couple years now and mostly throwing
    out the used quicklinks.

    Lately been fooling around with larger chainwheels so have had to splice in an
    extra linke or two.

    That got me thinking that it might be nice to have a little box of extra links
    laying around at no extra cost.

    So: has anybody been reusing these things with impunity?

    Not necessarily with impunity, but certainly with success. I caliper
    the pins, and if they're not worn, the link goes into the spares bin.
    About one in three passes the test, by the way, so I also have a
    number of spares of the KMC "single use" snaplink sitting here, on
    which the little nubs that are intended to make them non-removable
    have mysteriously vanished, leaving file marks behind. Oddly enough,
    I haven't had any trouble with them coming unsnapped, despite the lack
    of the nubs. YMMV.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  9. Per Qui si parla Campagnolo:

    Quoted message said:

    Broken chains really hurt.

    Been there... and agree 1000%...
    --
    PeteCresswell

  10. Per [email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    but in general our opinion rests on the idea that some chain links are
    reusable under some conditions
    1. poverty
    2. a UPS strike
    3. the lbs really doesn't like you
    4. you went an invested in tweo connex links and can't get your lazy

    expletive deleted together to file the little expletive delted
    down to spec
    5. you threw away the used links-seven years worth. boy are you
    stupid. you
    don't throw stuff away.that's your first mistake. but i doubt
    it.

    6. Somebody isn't poor, but is sometimes *really* cheap. Like Yours Truly, for
    instance.... But I've decided not to mess with the used links based on posts by
    others in this thread.

    It was just the idea of paying $4.00 for one lousy link when whole chains can be
    had for $9.00 on sale....
    --
    PeteCresswell

  11. (PeteCresswell) said:


    6. Somebody isn't poor, but is sometimes *really* cheap. Like Yours Truly, for
    instance.... But I've decided not to mess with the used links based on posts by
    others in this thread.

    It was just the idea of paying $4.00 for one lousy link when whole chains can be
    had for $9.00 on sale....

    Don't you own a Seven?

  12. Per Peter Cole:

    Quoted message said:

    Don't you own a Seven?

    **Sometimes*** really cheap..... Other times self-indulgent to the point where I
    feel guilty sometimes.

    Funny thing though - the Seven frame cost enough to feed an Indian village for a
    month; but when I crunched the numbers from going through two off-the-shelf
    frames that just couldn't be made to fit and one custom hardtail that turned out
    to be worse than the off-the-shelf frames it turns out that if I'd just thrown
    myself on SevenCycles' mercy on day 1 I'd have been ahead of the game by
    somewhat more than what the Seven frame cost.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  13. "(PeteCresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    6. Somebody isn't poor, but is sometimes *really* cheap. Like Yours
    Truly, for
    instance.... But I've decided not to mess with the used links based on
    posts by
    others in this thread.

    I believe the term is "frugal." 😉

    http://theshoestring.com/index.php?articleID=1080&sectionID=146

  14. "Werehatrack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Not necessarily with impunity, but certainly with success. I caliper
    the pins, and if they're not worn, the link goes into the spares bin.
    About one in three passes the test, by the way, so I also have a
    number of spares of the KMC "single use" snaplink sitting here, on
    which the little nubs that are intended to make them non-removable
    have mysteriously vanished, leaving file marks behind. Oddly enough,
    I haven't had any trouble with them coming unsnapped, despite the lack
    of the nubs. YMMV.

    <chuckle> Thanks for that.

    KMC's are widely available locally - and cheaply.
    I noticed the "single use only" warning on the packaging and skipped them in
    favour of the less common, more expensive SRAM Powerlinks. I'll pick the
    KMC's up and give them a go with a file.

    C.

  15. Per C.J.Patten:

    Quoted message said:

    http://theshoestring.com/index.php?articleID=1080&sectionID=146

    That was pretty good.

    --
    PeteCresswell

  16. Per C.J.Patten:

    Quoted message said:

    I noticed the "single use only" warning on the packaging and skipped them in
    favour of the less common, more expensive SRAM Powerlinks.

    The ones that come with my SRAM PC-48's bear a similar warning.
    --
    PeteCresswell

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.