Dave said the following on 21/07/2006 10:30:
Quoted message said:A lot depends on HOW it was bought.
I have seen parents go to buy a bike or shoes or other things without the
child being there.
I must admit that it hadn't occurred to me that that might be the case.
It just seems so natural to try things for size!
Quoted message said:If you haven't tried it with your child then you can hardly blame the shop
if the size is wrong.
*IF* that was the case, then you're right - the shop isn't to blame.
Quoted message said:If the tyre burst then it shows that it had been ridden (whatever the
distance), I would guess that they are only obliged to repair it.
Unless it was a leaky seal between tyre and rim (this was a tubeless
tyre), in which case given the distance ridden it will almost certainly
be dodgy fitting. If it was a puncture, then the OP's brother needs to
buy a puncture repair kit. The OP just says "burst", which is hardly an
accurate description. Did it really go bang?
Quoted message said:To guarantee a refund you must show that the shop was to blame for something
or that the bike was not fit for purpose which it is. They won't guarantee
tyres, and if it is too big then why buy it. They are not likely to give a
refund just because you don't like Halfords.
I don't have a problem with Halfords! *IF* the bike was sold with the
child present, then it isn't fit for purpose *IF* it really is too big.
Halfords are supposed to advise the parents if it's too big, although
I suppose parents don't have to take that advice, in which case, tough
luck. *IF* the tyre flattened because of dodgy fitting, then it should
be repaired by the shop. *IF* the tyre flattened because it got a
puncture, it should be repaired by the buyer.
There's a lot of IFs there, and as the OP hasn't given us enough detail
to cover every possible scenario there is little point in speculating
about every possible scenario.
--
Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/