General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Restaurant Chef Snobs

Started by Terry Pulliam Burd · · Last activity · 10 posts · 253 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 May 2005
Last activity
12 May 2005
Original author
Terry Pulliam Burd
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
253
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Okay, we've had our "Food Snobs" thread, but tonight's dinner at the
    Salt Creek Grill on PCH in Dana Point CA made me think of the number
    of truly awful (to me) menu offerings there are here in SoCal and, I
    suspect, elsewhere. Why does a chef take a pretty simple, nice idea
    for a dish and torque it into a ridiculous parody of the original
    dish? The DH ordered a barbecued pork sandwich that was "Upscaled" to
    the point of inedibility. After being offered a taste from a DH who
    was making faces, I couldn't identify half the ingredients, but can
    testify that they don't belong in barbecue. I had a Caesar salad with
    chicken, but the chicken had something on it that clashed horribly
    with the Caesar dressing and the Asiago cheese they used instead of
    Parmesan was way too strong. If you look at their online menu, it
    looks pretty tame, but their online menu doesn't show the more goofy
    concoctions. I see this time and again where a chef, in an attempt to
    be creative and have a "signature dish" just goes way over the top and
    uses "wasabi remoulade," "Cajun spices drizzled with a
    ginger soy wasabi ," "confetti of beurre blanc with blah blah blah."
    Macaroni and cheese can be presented with a dizzying array of spices
    and be presented as "pasta il formaggio con blah blah blah spices." Ya
    just never know when you're going to get sideswiped by some chef's bad
    idea. I guess everyone's mileage varies as to taste, but some
    "creations" should have stayed on the drawing board, IMHO.

    Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
    AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

    "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
    old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
    waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

    -- Duncan Hines

    To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

  2. "Terry Pulliam Burd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Okay, we've had our "Food Snobs" thread, but tonight's dinner at the
    Salt Creek Grill on PCH in Dana Point CA made me think of the number
    of truly awful (to me) menu offerings there are here in SoCal and, I
    suspect, elsewhere. Why does a chef take a pretty simple, nice idea
    for a dish and torque it into a ridiculous parody of the original
    dish? The DH ordered a barbecued pork sandwich that was "Upscaled" to
    the point of inedibility. After being offered a taste from a DH who
    was making faces, I couldn't identify half the ingredients, but can
    testify that they don't belong in barbecue. I had a Caesar salad with
    chicken, but the chicken had something on it that clashed horribly
    with the Caesar dressing and the Asiago cheese they used instead of
    Parmesan was way too strong. If you look at their online menu, it
    looks pretty tame, but their online menu doesn't show the more goofy
    concoctions. I see this time and again where a chef, in an attempt to
    be creative and have a "signature dish" just goes way over the top and
    uses "wasabi remoulade," "Cajun spices drizzled with a
    ginger soy wasabi ," "confetti of beurre blanc with blah blah blah."
    Macaroni and cheese can be presented with a dizzying array of spices
    and be presented as "pasta il formaggio con blah blah blah spices." Ya
    just never know when you're going to get sideswiped by some chef's bad
    idea. I guess everyone's mileage varies as to taste, but some
    "creations" should have stayed on the drawing board, IMHO.

    Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
    AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

    I have eaten at specific Salt Creek where you just ate as well as the Valencia
    Store. We decided to cab over there from the Ritz so I could have a reasonable
    amount of attitude adjustment and net worry about the CHP. Our experience was
    also mediocre at best. Let me rephrase that. It was terrible. I think it is
    typical California pretentious BS. At least In N Out has honest food.

    ;-o

    Dimitri

  3. Terry Pulliam Burd said:


    Okay, we've had our "Food Snobs" thread, but tonight's dinner at the
    Salt Creek Grill on PCH in Dana Point CA made me think of the number
    of truly awful (to me) menu offerings there are here in SoCal and, I
    suspect, elsewhere. Why does a chef take a pretty simple, nice idea
    for a dish and torque it into a ridiculous parody of the original
    dish? The DH ordered a barbecued pork sandwich that was "Upscaled" to
    the point of inedibility. After being offered a taste from a DH who
    was making faces, I couldn't identify half the ingredients, but can
    testify that they don't belong in barbecue. I had a Caesar salad with
    chicken, but the chicken had something on it that clashed horribly
    with the Caesar dressing and the Asiago cheese they used instead of
    Parmesan was way too strong. If you look at their online menu, it
    looks pretty tame, but their online menu doesn't show the more goofy
    concoctions. I see this time and again where a chef, in an attempt to
    be creative and have a "signature dish" just goes way over the top and
    uses "wasabi remoulade," "Cajun spices drizzled with a
    ginger soy wasabi ," "confetti of beurre blanc with blah blah blah."
    Macaroni and cheese can be presented with a dizzying array of spices
    and be presented as "pasta il formaggio con blah blah blah spices." Ya
    just never know when you're going to get sideswiped by some chef's bad
    idea. I guess everyone's mileage varies as to taste, but some
    "creations" should have stayed on the drawing board, IMHO.

    This is exactly why I have no interest in watching any
    of those Iron Chef things. I saw one and thought it was
    incredibly stupid.

    I'm afraid there's such a thing as being *too* creative.
    I see it in the other arts as well as cooking.

    Kate

    --
    Kate Connally
    “If I were as old as I feel, I’d be dead already.”
    Goldfish: “The wholesome snack that smiles back,
    Until you bite their heads off.”
    What if the hokey pokey really *is* what it's all about?
    [email hidden]

  4. Kate Connally said:

    I'm afraid there's such a thing as being *too* creative.
    I see it in the other arts as well as cooking.

    If it is creation for the sake of creation and not for taste, then there
    is such a thing.

    jim

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Terry Pulliam Burd said:

    The DH ordered ....
    After being offered a taste from a DH who...

    What's a "DH"? Dumbhead? [censored]? Da Husband? What? Just curious.

    -A

  6. axlq said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Terry Pulliam Burd said:

    The DH ordered ....
    After being offered a taste from a DH who...

    What's a "DH"? Dumbhead? [censored]? Da Husband? What? Just curious.

    -A

    Depends on the persons mood, but sometimes it means "Dear Husband". All
    of the others could probably apply depending on the circumstances. ;-)

    --
    Steve
    Ever notice that putting the and IRS together makes "theirs"?

  7. Yes, there IS such a thing as being too creative with the cooking. And
    definitely such a thing as failing to acknowledge that an idea didn't
    work. =o\ But trial and error is how we find out what we like.
    SOMEBODY had to eat the first snail, first oyster, first caviar, etc
    etc etc. I'm not a fan of "Let's throw in the kitchen sink and see how
    this tastes" kind of cooking, though. Test first, taste, if it's
    awful, scrap it, but don't serve it! Some tastes truly DO not work
    together.

    Melissa

  8. Quoted message said:

    Yes, there IS such a thing as being too creative with the cooking. And
    definitely such a thing as failing to acknowledge that an idea didn't
    work. =o\ But trial and error is how we find out what we like.
    SOMEBODY had to eat the first snail, first oyster, first caviar, etc
    etc etc. I'm not a fan of "Let's throw in the kitchen sink and see how
    this tastes" kind of cooking, though. Test first, taste, if it's
    awful, scrap it, but don't serve it! Some tastes truly DO not work
    together.

    It's great that modern transportation and storage systems allow us access
    to ingredients that we never used to see in the stores. A lot of us have
    moved away from all the old standards that we were raised on. It was meat,
    potatoes and local vegetables in my family when I was a kid. Even so, I
    think that some restaurants have gone a little overboard. I am pretty
    adventurous when it comes to trying new foods, but I also have to deal with
    some sensitivities to certain foods, like avoiding nuts completely, and
    avoiding tomatoes and potatoes as much as possible.

    Eating at some of the better (more expensive?) local restaurants has become
    a bit of a challenge. They seem to be trying to outdo each other in the
    use of exotic ingredients and strange combinations. I was at one of these
    places a while ago and trying to select something interesting from the menu
    but ended up making my selection more by the process of elimination.
    Things looked interesting, but they had ingredients that I just didn't see
    going with the dish. I settled on grilled salmon with a honey mustard
    sauce. It was the least objectionable selection, but I had my doubts about
    the honey mustard with the salmon. The salmon fillet was a good portion
    and cooked to perfection. The sauce was just as I expected. It tasted good,
    but it just didn't go with salmon. It would have been great on ribs or
    maybe even a loin of pork, but not salmon.

  9. On Wed, 11 May 2005 22:43:46 +0000 (UTC), [email hidden] (axlq)

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Terry Pulliam Burd said:

    The DH ordered ....
    After being offered a taste from a DH who...

    What's a "DH"? Dumbhead? [censored]? Da Husband? What? Just curious.

    "Dear Husband." Once upon a time, everyone was worried about using up
    bandwidth, so Usenet has always used acronyms. They're not used nearly
    as much as, say, ten years ago, but a few old favorites linger. Go
    here for a fairly good list of Usenet acronyms:

    http://www.geocities.com/eedd88/abbreviations.html?200511

    Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
    AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

    "If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
    old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
    waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

    -- Duncan Hines

    To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

  10. axlq said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Terry Pulliam Burd said:

    The DH ordered ....
    After being offered a taste from a DH who...

    What's a "DH"? Dumbhead? [censored]? Da Husband? What? Just curious.

    -A

    You forgot designated hitter.

    jim

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.