General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Responding to Jan's False Accusations, Again

Started by Mark Thorson · · Last activity · 6 posts · 465 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 January 2004
Last activity
22 January 2004
Original author
Mark Thorson
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
465
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Jury Finds Neck Manipulation Led To Fatal Stroke From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
    Date: 1/17/2004 8:13 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Read about it here:

    celltech.comresponse.asp

    Yeah, that's the retraction. Note that nowhere in the retraction does it say any of my statements
    were false, therefore they couldn't possibly be lies, right?

    If you disagree, please provide an example of one of these lies. You've repeatedly called me a
    liar over these statements, but you have never posted EVEN ONE example of any of these statements
    which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    You said one of these lies included the word "delibrately".

    Why don't you post that statement, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me of being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that why you won't post this statement, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

  2. Mark Thorson <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Jury Finds Neck Manipulation Led To Fatal Stroke From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
    Date: 1/17/2004 8:13 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Read about it here:

    celltech.comresponse.asp

    Yeah, that's the retraction. Note that nowhere in the retraction does it say any of my statements
    were false, therefore they couldn't possibly be lies, right?

    If you disagree, please provide an example of one of these lies. You've repeatedly called me a
    liar over these statements, but you have never posted EVEN ONE example of any of these statements
    which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    You said one of these lies included the word "delibrately".

    Why don't you post that statement, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me of
    being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that why you won't post this statement, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

    Jan cannot for two reasons.

    1) She cannot ever admit to anyone that she was wrong...ever..not even to herself!
    2) She likes lies and prefers them to the truth. The truth is boring and lies are so much
    more exciting.
    3) Her dictionary is totally broken.

    r

    --
    Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.

  3. The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to
    various newsgroups:

    Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer

    During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and other newsgroups a
    file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I now retract the statements made in the
    Anatoxin-a Primer.

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake, produced by Cell Tech,
    contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately
    avoids testing for this toxin because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA
    users. I have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would disclose anatoxin-
    a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue Green Algae. I had no basis for the
    suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.

    Right, you simply make baseless statements that happen to be false. But, you never lie. You are a
    pathetic person who obviously has no life.

    "Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Jury Finds Neck Manipulation Led To Fatal Stroke From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
    Date: 1/17/2004 8:13 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Read about it here:

    celltech.comresponse.asp

    Yeah, that's the retraction. Note that nowhere in the retraction does it say any of my statements
    were false, therefore they couldn't possibly be lies, right?

    If you disagree, please provide an example of one of these lies. You've repeatedly called me a
    liar over these statements, but you have never posted EVEN ONE example of any of these statements
    which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    You said one of these lies included the word "delibrately".

    Why don't you post that statement, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me of
    being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that why you won't post this statement, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

  4. Thanks Dave, Well it is simple enough. He lied and then retracted his lie. Either way we have all
    been subjected to his mental state over this issue for far to long. I think he even calls himself a
    Doctor of sorts but perhaps he should be calling to see a Doctor of sorts.

    Thanks again Dave,

    Rod. "Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to various newsgroups:

    Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer

    During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and other newsgroups a file
    of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I


    now

    Quoted message said:

    retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath


    Lake,

    Quoted message said:

    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized


    as

    Quoted message said:

    addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin because anatoxin-a is
    responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users.


    I

    Quoted message said:

    have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would disclose anatoxin-a, and
    that this toxin has never been found in Super


    Blue

    Quoted message said:

    Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a Primer, and I hereby
    retract it in full.

    Right, you simply make baseless statements that happen to be false. But,


    you

    Quoted message said:

    never lie. You are a pathetic person who obviously has no life.

    "Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan the Accuser said:

    >Subject: Jury Finds Neck Manipulation Led To Fatal Stroke From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
    >Date: 1/17/2004 8:13 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>
    >
    >Read about it here:

    celltech.comresponse.asp

    Yeah, that's the retraction. Note that nowhere in the retraction does it say any of my
    statements were false, therefore they couldn't possibly be lies, right?

    If you disagree, please provide an example of one of these lies. You've repeatedly called me a
    liar over these statements, but you have never posted EVEN ONE example of any of these
    statements which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    You said one of these lies included the word "delibrately".

    Why don't you post that statement, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me of being
    a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that why you won't post this statement, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.


  5. "Rod" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Thanks Dave, Well it is simple enough. He lied and then retracted his lie. Either way we have all
    been subjected to his mental state over this issue for far to long. I think he even calls himself
    a Doctor of sorts but


    perhaps

    Quoted message said:

    he should be calling to see a Doctor of sorts.

    That was so negative, Rod, so negative.

  6. << You are a despicable human being. >>

    And you are just as despicable!! Put that in your pipe and smoke it....

    "If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.