General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Responding to Jan's False Accusations, Again

Started by Mark Thorson · · Last activity · 15 posts · 282 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 January 2004
Last activity
30 January 2004
Original author
Mark Thorson
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
282
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Jury Finds Neck Manipulation Led To Fatal Stroke
    From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
    Date: 1/17/2004 8:13 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Read about it here:

    http://www.celltech.com/resources/info_central/response.asp

    Yeah, that's the retraction. Note that nowhere in the
    retraction does it say any of my statements were false,
    therefore they couldn't possibly be lies, right?

    If you disagree, please provide an example of one
    of these lies. You've repeatedly called me a liar
    over these statements, but you have never posted
    EVEN ONE example of any of these statements
    which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    You said one of these lies included the word
    "delibrately".

    Why don't you post that statement, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me
    of being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that why you won't post this statement, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

  2. Mark Thorson <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Jury Finds Neck Manipulation Led To Fatal Stroke
    From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
    Date: 1/17/2004 8:13 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Read about it here:

    http://www.celltech.com/resources/info_central/response.asp

    Yeah, that's the retraction. Note that nowhere in the
    retraction does it say any of my statements were false,
    therefore they couldn't possibly be lies, right?

    If you disagree, please provide an example of one
    of these lies. You've repeatedly called me a liar
    over these statements, but you have never posted
    EVEN ONE example of any of these statements
    which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    You said one of these lies included the word
    "delibrately".

    Why don't you post that statement, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me
    of being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that why you won't post this statement, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

    Jan cannot for two reasons.

    1) She cannot ever admit to anyone that she was wrong...ever..not even to
    herself!
    2) She likes lies and prefers them to the truth. The truth is boring and
    lies are so much more exciting.
    3) Her dictionary is totally broken.

    r

    --
    Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.

  3. The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to
    various newsgroups:

    Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer

    During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and
    other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I now
    retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,
    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as
    addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin
    because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users. I
    have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would
    disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue
    Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a
    Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.

    Right, you simply make baseless statements that happen to be false. But, you
    never lie.
    You are a pathetic person who obviously has no life.

    "Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Jury Finds Neck Manipulation Led To Fatal Stroke
    From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
    Date: 1/17/2004 8:13 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Read about it here:

    http://www.celltech.com/resources/info_central/response.asp

    Yeah, that's the retraction. Note that nowhere in the
    retraction does it say any of my statements were false,
    therefore they couldn't possibly be lies, right?

    If you disagree, please provide an example of one
    of these lies. You've repeatedly called me a liar
    over these statements, but you have never posted
    EVEN ONE example of any of these statements
    which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    You said one of these lies included the word
    "delibrately".

    Why don't you post that statement, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me
    of being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that why you won't post this statement, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

  4. Thanks Dave,
    Well it is simple enough. He lied and then retracted his lie.
    Either way we have all been subjected to his mental state over this issue
    for far to long. I think he even calls himself a Doctor of sorts but perhaps
    he should be calling to see a Doctor of sorts.

    Thanks again Dave,

    Rod.
    "Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to
    various newsgroups:

    Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer

    During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and
    other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I


    now

    Quoted message said:

    retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.

    The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath


    Lake,

    Quoted message said:

    produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized


    as

    Quoted message said:

    addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin
    because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users.


    I

    Quoted message said:

    have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would
    disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super


    Blue

    Quoted message said:

    Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a
    Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.

    Right, you simply make baseless statements that happen to be false. But,


    you

    Quoted message said:

    never lie.
    You are a pathetic person who obviously has no life.

    "Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jan the Accuser said:

    >Subject: Jury Finds Neck Manipulation Led To Fatal Stroke
    >From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
    >Date: 1/17/2004 8:13 PM Pacific Standard Time
    >Message-id: <[email hidden]>
    >
    >Read about it here:

    http://www.celltech.com/resources/info_central/response.asp

    Yeah, that's the retraction. Note that nowhere in the
    retraction does it say any of my statements were false,
    therefore they couldn't possibly be lies, right?

    If you disagree, please provide an example of one
    of these lies. You've repeatedly called me a liar
    over these statements, but you have never posted
    EVEN ONE example of any of these statements
    which is a lie.

    Why don't you do that, Jan?

    You said one of these lies included the word
    "delibrately".

    Why don't you post that statement, Jan?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that this statement is OBVIOUSLY NOT A LIE?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that Jan Drew has FALSELY ACCUSED me
    of being a LIAR?

    Is it because if you did, everybody would see
    that it is Jan Drew who is the LIAR?

    Is that why you won't post this statement, Jan?

    Is that why you won't post this LIE you claim I told?

    You are a despicable human being.

  5. "Rod" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Thanks Dave,
    Well it is simple enough. He lied and then retracted his lie.
    Either way we have all been subjected to his mental state over this issue
    for far to long. I think he even calls himself a Doctor of sorts but


    perhaps

    Quoted message said:

    he should be calling to see a Doctor of sorts.

    That was so negative, Rod, so negative.

  6. << You are a despicable human being. >>

    And you are just as despicable!! Put that in your pipe and smoke it....

    "If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

  7. << That was so negative, Rod, so negative. >>

    Isn't *Negative* your middle name, Probert?

    "If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

  8. "DEBBEE1023" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    << That was so negative, Rod, so negative. >>

    Isn't *Negative* your middle name, Probert?

    I would rather have negative than "jerk" as you do.

    BYW, what is your fixation with Bulls these days? Lonely?

  9. Quoted message said:


    "DEBBEE1023" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    << That was so negative, Rod, so negative. >>

    Isn't *Negative* your middle name, Probert?

    I would rather have negative than "jerk" as you do.

    BYW, what is your fixation with Bulls these days? Lonely?

    Perhaps the constant stench of [censored] that radiates from her pie-hole has
    something to do with it.

  10. << I would rather have negative than "jerk" as you do. >>
    Wow, Probert, I am so "insulted"...NOT!!!

    << BYW, what is your fixation with Bulls these days? Lonely? >>

    Not hardly.....some of us have a life....and I only come back here every now,
    and then to see if you are still are enjoying seeing your name over and over
    and over...with the same old BULL...

    "If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

  11. << Perhaps the constant stench of [censored] that radiates from her pie-hole has
    something to do with it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Jealous, Ilsa? aka Andrew aka???

    "If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

  12. "DEBBEE1023" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    << I would rather have negative than "jerk" as you do. >>
    Wow, Probert, I am so "insulted"...NOT!!!

    << BYW, what is your fixation with Bulls these days? Lonely? >>

    Not hardly.....some of us have a life....and I only come back here every


    now,

    Quoted message said:

    and then to see if you are still are enjoying seeing your name over and


    over

    Quoted message said:

    and over...with the same old BULL...

    There ya go, again..worrying about a bull...Debbee, if you are as lonely as
    you seem to be...why not visit a prison?

  13. DEBBEE1023 said:

    I only come back here every now,
    and then

    .. . . when you forget to take your meds.

  14. <<
    There ya go, again..worrying about a bull...Debbee, if you are as lonely as
    you seem to be...why not visit a prison? >>

    Not lonely in the least.....perhaps you are the one that is "jailbait".

    "If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

  15. "DEBBEE1023" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    <<
    There ya go, again..worrying about a bull...Debbee, if you are as lonely


    as

    Quoted message said:

    you seem to be...why not visit a prison? >>

    Not lonely in the least.....perhaps you are the one that is "jailbait".

    I stopped being jailbait decades ago, but, thanks for asking.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.