Tamyka Bell said:Bleve said:
Theo Bekkers said:Bleve wrote:
> Theo Bekkers wrote:>> Hmm.. Bleve saw someone doing something reaaly stupid (taking off
>> when the light was red whilst talking on his mobile) and wished he
>> had a truck with a bullbar so he could get the satisfaction of
>> prying said person from his bullbar with a crowbar. Just how did I
>> miss the context? He thought the person deserved to die and wishes
>> he was the person to effect said death.
>
> I don't recall mentioning death at all, that's your take. Given that
> the collision would have been at low speed (context, remember? the
> turd was only doing maybe a maximum of 20km/h, he'd just accelerated
> from a stop and would have traveled maybe 10 metres) the prying from
> a bullbar would have been panel damage and a rude shock, and a
> significant impact on the turd's day, but no injury.Interesting that you put this spin on your remarks just seven minutes
after
Tam posted this "context". :-)
I took it from your initial post that you felt this person, not his
vehicle, deserved serious injury, and Zebee had the same understanding.
If I misunderstood you, I apologise. It appears now that you only
wanted to seriously damage his property.Apology accepted. I didn't even want to seriously damage his property,
just seriously inconvenience him such that he might learn a lesson.There, now we're all happy again!
Tam
He he he ...
Now if Bleve apologises for suggesting Theo was clueless
(Theo's 'understanding' was shared by at least two others), and you
apologise for your inaccurate age-ist comment then everything will be fine.
Just ... couldn't ... resist ... it
Cheers,
Vince