General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Recurring back pain

Started by brian0918 · · Last activity · 13 posts · 282 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
2 October 2005
Last activity
4 October 2005
Original author
brian0918
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
282
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm not an avid runner by any stretch of the imagination. I started
    jogging again for the first time in quite a while about 2 months ago. I
    would only do a mile or two, then some walking, every other day. A few
    weeks into it, I woke up one day and had this severe pain throughout
    the left side of my back, primarily along the edge of the rib cage. It
    took a week for the pain to go away so I could start jogging again. Not
    much more time passed when it happened again. It's been a week and I'm
    finally over it, so I went out jogging today. I got through a mile and
    started walking, then I went to jog again and only got through a
    quarter of a mile when there was a sharp pain right in that spot. So, I
    stopped jogging and walked.

    Any idea what to do about it? What sort of stretching might help?

    Thanks.

  2. brian0918 said:

    I'm not an avid runner by any stretch of the imagination. I started
    jogging again for the first time in quite a while about 2 months ago. I
    would only do a mile or two, then some walking, every other day. A few
    weeks into it, I woke up one day and had this severe pain throughout
    the left side of my back, primarily along the edge of the rib cage. It
    took a week for the pain to go away so I could start jogging again. Not
    much more time passed when it happened again. It's been a week and I'm
    finally over it, so I went out jogging today. I got through a mile and
    started walking, then I went to jog again and only got through a
    quarter of a mile when there was a sharp pain right in that spot. So, I
    stopped jogging and walked.

    Any idea what to do about it? What sort of stretching might help?

    Go to a chiropractor. They will adjust you if needed, and suggest
    exercises for it. Are you stretching now? That aggravates my back to
    where I could not run.

  3. I wouldn't trust my back in the hands of one of those nuts.

  4. brian0918 said:

    I wouldn't trust my back in the hands of one of those nuts.

    They wouldn't treat a jerkoff like you. I could point out that 99% of
    medical Dr's, sports Dr's. PT's, and a few others, ALL recognize
    chiro's as legit, but you are too busy "squeezing one off" to read a
    reasonable response.

  5. And yet the American Medical Association and the National Council
    Against Health Fraud both recognize the nonsense of chiropractics. You
    may want to read:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiropractic

    Of note is the founder of all of chiropractics, Daniel Palmer, who got
    his start peddling "magnetic healing" cures in the 1880s. He then
    invented out of thin air spinal misalignments, subluxations, and, of
    course, the cure to all of these:

    "Palmer imbued the term "subluxation" with a metaphysical and
    philosophical meaning. He held that certain dislocations of bones
    interfered with the "innate intelligence", a kind of spiritual energy
    or life force dependent upon God that connects the brain to the rest of
    the body. Palmer claimed that subluxations interfered with the proper
    communication of this innate intelligence with the rest of the body,
    and that by fixing them 95% of diseases could be treated."

    The entirity of chiropractics today is based on one paper, "The RAND
    report on The Appropriateness of Spinal Manipulation for Lower-Back
    Pain", which suggests that there may be some benefits to so-called
    "spinal manipulations" in the lower back. And yet somehow this claim of
    "benefit" has been extended to the entire body.

    The head of the RAND research has even rebuked this nonsense:

    "...we have become aware of numerous instances where our results have
    been seriously misrepresented by chiropractors writing for their local
    paper or writing letters to the editor....RAND's studies were about
    spinal manipulation, not chiropractic, and dealt with appropriateness,
    which is a measure of net benefit and harms. Comparative efficacy of
    chiropractic and other treatments was not explicitly dealt with."

    And that is the end of my "squeezing one off".

  6. brian0918 said:

    And yet the American Medical Association and the National Council
    Against Health Fraud both recognize the nonsense of chiropractics. You
    may want to read:

    Oh yes, and we all know how smart the government is. The AMA got sued
    by chiros and LOST in court. Think they might have an axe to grind?
    Nonetheless, chiros are respected by most MD's for many years now. You
    need to update the [censored] below.

    Quoted message said:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiropractic

    This site doesn't work, and Wikpedia is not know for it's accuracy.

    Quoted message said:

    Of note is the founder of all of chiropractics, Daniel Palmer, who got
    his start peddling "magnetic healing" cures in the 1880s. He then
    invented out of thin air spinal misalignments, subluxations, and, of
    course, the cure to all of these:

    These are very real conditions. I know, because I would be unable to
    even walk, nevermind run without chiropractic treatrment. MD's told me
    I'd be in a wheelchair by the time I was 40. I'm in my late 40's and
    run 9 miles a day, and lift every other day. You know what my MD said
    when I told him I do that? That I'm "FULL OF [censored]". He simply does not
    believe it.
    Having to bring up the founder who lived over 100 years ago, and his
    info is just showing your idiotic desperation. They also thought the
    earth was flat. Sure there are chiros who think they can cure anything
    with manipulation, but on the other end we have MD's who said laetrile
    cured cancer, more that announced a cure for AIDS by freezing your
    blood, and the list of MD quacks goes on and on, so this whole
    discussion about quacks is pretty stupid.
    The only reason they have a bad rep is because people like my mother
    (a RN back in the 40's to 80's) told stories of a friend (unknown
    name, because it was probably a stupid wives tale) whose husband had
    back pain and sought relief from a chiro. When after two months of
    treatment he still had pain, he went to an MD. He had bone cancer in
    his spine, and died a month later. OF COURSE it was the chiros fault,
    and the CHIRO killed him, not the cancer. And they blamed the chiro
    when in all actuality it was his own fault for not going to an MD
    first. These days chiros do xrays on your "first ever visit" to
    prevent things like this from happening. My chiro, a second generation
    chiro, has advised me several times to see an MD for suspicious things
    that he felt maybe life threatening.
    More recently, a couple years ago I started a thread called something
    like "they want to stick WHAT up my ass?" when they/I thought I was
    having bowel problems because I couldn't [censored], and I was bleeding
    heavily. I sought out a MD who specializes in [censored] cancer, and he had
    some pretty bizarre ideas about shoving scopes up my [censored]. I talked
    him into writing me a note (recommendation) to go to a chiro, since my
    insurance would pay if an MD did that. Several treatments later the
    [censored] flowed like fine wine! When I returned to that MD a month later
    he was amazed, and said there was no need to scope me. The muscles in
    and around my [censored] were so bunched up it caused a large mass of
    knotted muscles that were partially blocking my sphincter.
    Although at that time Roidger frequented this forum, and I suspect his
    verbal garbage was really the cause of the backup.
    I now as I sit here, there is a marble sized knot on the right side on
    my neck, at the very top of my spine. One good "crack" and it's gone
    along with the headaches.
    I could go on and on, but if you are too stupid to open your mind and
    listen, like my mother was, then it'd just be a bigger waste of my
    time.
    The bottom line is people seek out chiros for troubles that chiros
    cannot fix, then when they don't get results they cry about chiros
    being quacks and crooks, when the fault lies with themselves for going
    to the wrong kind of Dr to begin with.
    New chiros of the last 20 or so years spend more time learning how to
    make money than they do on studying anatomy or learning how to help
    people. As a result there are many crooks in it just to make money,
    not to help people.
    Do you call osteopaths quacks too? They are MD's that manipulate you
    as chiros do, but in a different, less traumatic way.
    You can believe what you want, tens of millions disagree with your
    archaic ideas.

  7. Thank you for your calm, sound-minded reply. Unfortunately, as it goes
    with real science, I cannot accept anecdotal evidence. Peer-reviewed,
    scientific research that has been thoroughly repeated is the only
    acceptable source.

    I also thank you for your brilliant debunking of all 700,000 Wikipedia
    articles with a mere 7 written words. Quite an achievement, I must say.
    It is now obvious to me that nobody (including yourself) should bother
    reading or replying to any statements that have been copied from
    Wikipedia, regardless of their verifiability or accuracy.

    As it is obvious that I won't be getting any help with my back _muscle_
    problems here, I won't bother watching this thread anymore. Feel free
    to spin away.

  8. brian0918 said:

    Thank you for your calm, sound-minded reply. Unfortunately, as it goes
    with real science, I cannot accept anecdotal evidence. Peer-reviewed,
    scientific research that has been thoroughly repeated is the only
    acceptable source.

    I also thank you for your brilliant debunking of all 700,000 Wikipedia
    articles with a mere 7 written words. Quite an achievement, I must say.
    It is now obvious to me that nobody (including yourself) should bother
    reading or replying to any statements that have been copied from
    Wikipedia, regardless of their verifiability or accuracy.

    As it is obvious that I won't be getting any help with my back _muscle_
    problems here, I won't bother watching this thread anymore. Feel free
    to spin away.

    You've just proven yourself to ba a complete and total idiot. I'm
    glad you are leaving this thread. We've even had MD's, PT's and many,
    many others here tell how chiropractors have a niche in the medical
    community, but yopu'll ignore all that, my words and experience, so
    you may continue to wallow in your stupidity.
    Noe f**k off you you dipshit.

  9. I dunno. I had to go through some PT for a bulging disk in my neck. The
    therapist, who had previously worked in a chiropractor's office, said, in
    essence, she wouldn't trust them either. She said the "adjustments" often
    achieve short-term results, requiring repeated visits. And those repeated
    visits often involve lots of bone-on-bone skeletal manipulation that can,
    over time, damage joints and lead to degenerative conditions like
    arthritis. In contrast, PT works on treating and improving the supporting
    muscle and tissues.

    It was the same reason that both my ortho and my general doc also
    suggested PT and dismissed chiro. (By the way, in my own unscientific
    study, that's nowhere near 99%).

    TheBillRogers <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    brian0918 said:

    I wouldn't trust my back in the hands of one of those nuts.

    They wouldn't treat a jerkoff like you. I could point out that 99% of
    medical Dr's, sports Dr's. PT's, and a few others, ALL recognize
    chiro's as legit, but you are too busy "squeezing one off" to read a
    reasonable response.

  10. On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:43:13 -0500, Newsdude <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I dunno. I had to go through some PT for a bulging disk in my neck. The
    therapist, who had previously worked in a chiropractor's office, said, in
    essence, she wouldn't trust them either.

    Due to working in ONE's office? Hardly convincing, especially when
    many PT's do manipulation themselves.

    Quoted message said:

    he said the "adjustments" often
    achieve short-term results, requiring repeated visits.

    Very true, and there is a logical explanation behind that. When you
    are injured and a disc moves, your body tries to return it back to the
    proper position, the result is muscle spasms and pain. When a chiro
    cracks it back into place, the body also sees this as another injury,
    and tries to return it to the original (but incorrect) position.
    Therefore sometimes several visits are required.
    A recent study I saw said that with many injuries chiros treat, a year
    later if they are left untreated will usually, return to normal. The
    big difference being a chiro undoes the damage right away, and saves
    you a year of pain and debilitation. However certain conditions like
    mine only get continually worse, making chiropractic treatments
    necassary. I have prescribed pain killers and muscle relaxers in my
    med cabinet, and these are all a MD can do for me. So my/your choice
    is simple, months or a year off of work suffering debilitating pain,
    downing pain killers and muscle relaxers, staying in bed, or a few
    visits to a chiro and you're back to your normal routine in days or
    weeks instead of a year.
    I went to chiros for years, then stopped. A few years later I had a
    fragmented disc and bone spurs that never would've happened had I
    continued going.

    Quoted message said:

    nd those repeated
    visits often involve lots of bone-on-bone skeletal manipulation that can,
    over time, damage joints and lead to degenerative conditions like
    arthritis.

    So can just about anything if overdone. As far as I know, there is no
    "bone on bone manipulation" that I've ever heard of.

    Quoted message said:

    n contrast, PT works on treating and improving the supporting
    muscle and tissues.

    Many also do adjustments.

    Quoted message said:

    It was the same reason that both my ortho and my general doc also
    suggested PT and dismissed chiro. (By the way, in my own unscientific
    study, that's nowhere near 99%).

    Medical Dr's do not want to share their fees with non-medical Dr's,
    and also won't admit there's little they can do for you, when a lesser
    trained chiro can.

  11. "brian0918" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I wouldn't trust my back in the hands of one of those nuts.

    See a GP, way too early, for any specialist.

    -DF

  12. TheBillRogers said:

    You know what my MD said? That I'm "FULL OF [censored]".

    Well duh, Einstein.

    Why don't you invite him to join this ng, at least he has demonstrated
    a grasp of the obvious.

  13. "Charlie Pendejo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    TheBillRogers said:

    You know what my MD said? That I'm "FULL OF [censored]".

    Well duh, Einstein.

    Why don't you invite him to join this ng, at least he has demonstrated
    a grasp of the obvious.

    Ain't that the truth! 🙂 🙂

    -DF

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.