Road Cycling · Public discussion

Recovery drinks

Started by Rick Roof · · Last activity · 31 posts · 1,034 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
15 September 2004
Last activity
18 September 2004
Original author
Rick Roof
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,034
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Powerbar recovery or Endurox R4? What about Accelerade vs. Powerbar
    hydrate. Anyone have experience with any of these products. Taste?

    Thanks

  2. Quoted message said:

    Powerbar recovery or Endurox R4?

    They both have the "golden" 4:1 carb:protein ratio for recovery drinks.

    Quoted message said:

    What about Accelerade vs. Powerbar
    hydrate.

    Use them both. Accelerade is heavier (to me, anyway). I like Lemon-Lime
    and, to a lesser extent Fruit Punch. Orange and Rasberry were too sweet for
    me.

    PBH is lighter. Have just started using it, past couple of weeks. Lemon-
    lime is the best flavor. True, it's also the only flavor.

    I'd be interested in seeing what some of the more knowledgeable people here
    say. My guess is that the differences between them are quite small in
    practical value.

    I assume that there's some validated, established evidence (not theoretical
    speculation or subjective and/or anecdotal opinion) that they're better
    than Gatorade and the like. For cyclists.

    True? False?

    Roy

  3. We've hashed and rehashed this subject as much as power. While I
    haven't looked at this "new" research Carmichael and Power Bar cite I
    know this:

    the magic 4:1 ratio is useful, but not essential to recovery. The
    fact is that if you have to train or compete with less than 24 hrs
    recovery (e.g., a stage race or double stage) then such a drink is
    very useful and can enhance glycogen repletion. However, once you get
    past 24 hrs there really is no difference between protein and
    carbohydrate vs. carbohydrate only drinks.

    IMO, I would use something like this after any really hard training
    session or race because it can't hurt and could help, but do I
    wouldn't be too concerned if you can't. I would also suggest that
    unless you can get a deal on this stuff you might be better off making
    your own (its not rocket science) if you use it often.

    I also question the value of putting protein in a drink during
    exercise. The research I've seen (I can find some links if anyone
    questions this) suggests no real evidence for this. It's all smoke in
    mirrors. Reflecting back on a past discussion, I stated that a friend
    of mine conducted one of the studies Cytomax cites and they don't lie;
    Cytomax will buffer lactate. Unfortunately, you need to consume super
    concentrated Cytomax to do it (way over their suggested serving) and
    it will lead to severe diarrhea. Not a good thing in a long bike
    race.

    Chris Harnish, M.S.
    Exercise Physiologist and Coach
    The Peaks Coaching Group

    Roy Gordon <royg_XOUT@sonic_xout.com> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Powerbar recovery or Endurox R4?

    They both have the "golden" 4:1 carb:protein ratio for recovery drinks.

    Quoted message said:

    What about Accelerade vs. Powerbar
    hydrate.

    Use them both. Accelerade is heavier (to me, anyway). I like Lemon-Lime
    and, to a lesser extent Fruit Punch. Orange and Rasberry were too sweet for
    me.

    PBH is lighter. Have just started using it, past couple of weeks. Lemon-
    lime is the best flavor. True, it's also the only flavor.

    I'd be interested in seeing what some of the more knowledgeable people here
    say. My guess is that the differences between them are quite small in
    practical value.

    I assume that there's some validated, established evidence (not theoretical
    speculation or subjective and/or anecdotal opinion) that they're better
    than Gatorade and the like. For cyclists.

    True? False?

    Roy

  4. chris said:
    Quoted message said:

    PBH is lighter. Have just started using it, past couple of weeks. Lemon-
    lime is the best flavor. True, it's also the only flavor.

    I'd be interested in seeing what some of the more knowledgeable people here
    say. My guess is that the differences between them are quite small in
    practical value.

    I assume that there's some validated, established evidence (not theoretical
    speculation or subjective and/or anecdotal opinion) that they're better
    than Gatorade and the like. For cyclists.

    True? False?

    A study should also include something simple, like oatmeal with some unsweetened soy milk, etc,
    to assess the need for these overprocessed recovery drink powders in the first place.

    Dan

  5. Rick Roof said:


    Powerbar recovery or Endurox R4? What about Accelerade vs. Powerbar
    hydrate. Anyone have experience with any of these products. Taste?

    May I suggest urine?

    http://www.heartlandhealing.com/pages/archive/urine_therapy/

    No, I don't have experience and so don't know about the taste.

  6. Dan Connelly said:


    chris said:
    Quoted message said:

    PBH is lighter. Have just started using it, past couple of weeks. Lemon-
    lime is the best flavor. True, it's also the only flavor.

    I'd be interested in seeing what some of the more knowledgeable people here
    say. My guess is that the differences between them are quite small in
    practical value.

    I assume that there's some validated, established evidence (not theoretical
    speculation or subjective and/or anecdotal opinion) that they're better
    than Gatorade and the like. For cyclists.

    True? False?

    A study should also include something simple, like oatmeal with some unsweetened soy milk, etc,
    to assess the need for these overprocessed recovery drink powders in the first place.

    What does "overprocessed" mean? The "processed" drinks don't have fiber? They
    are more concentrated? I have used OptiFuel II (and Metabolol) and it was
    basically a *complete* food, aside from little or no fat. Personally I would
    tune in more closely to the "overpriced" aspect when looking at options rather
    than worrying about how much it was "processed."

  7. gwhite said:

    What does "overprocessed" mean? The "processed" drinks don't have fiber? They
    are more concentrated? I have used OptiFuel II (and Metabolol) and it was
    basically a *complete* food, aside from little or no fat. Personally I would
    tune in more closely to the "overpriced" aspect when looking at options rather
    than worrying about how much it was "processed."

    Well, to start with, acesulfame-K basically stands out as a red flag. I am not going
    to peruse the very deep list any deeper.

    Ingredients:
    Metacarb Plus (proprietary carbohydrate blend comprised of: maltodextrin and enzyme modified food starch),
    PEPTOL PER4+ (proprietary protein-amino acid blend containing: egg albumen, whey protein concentrate,
    calcium caseinate, milk protein isolate, L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L valine, L-phenylalanine, L-methionine,
    L-threonine, L-lysine, L-carnitine HCl and L-glutamic acid), fructose, whey, dutch cocoa powder,
    onfat milk, medium chain triglycerides, lecithin, Metavite (proprietary vitamin-mineral formulation
    which includes: calcium carbonate, magnesium oxide, magnesium lysinate, di-calcium phosphate,
    inositol, calcium citrate, molybdenum aspartate, potassium phosphate, iron succinate, zinc citrate,
    d-alpha tocopherol succinate, copper glycinate, choline bitartrate, zinc picolinate, niacin, manganese
    citrate, calcium pantothenate, selenium methionate, retinyl palmitate, thiamine HCl, pyridoxal-5-phosphate,
    riboflavin-5-phosphate, pyridoxine alpha-ketoglutarate [PAK], chromium nicotinyl, chromium polynicotinate,
    yanocobalamin, vitamin D3, potassium iodide, d-biotin, folic acid, lipoic acid, and intrinsic factor complex), \
    natural flavoring, inosine, calcium lactate, xanthan food gum, acesulfame-K, Succinate ETF (proprietary succinate
    compound that includes: potassium succinate, magnesium succinate, calcium succinate, L-glutamic acid), Ester C®
    (esterified calcium polyascorbate), carrageenan, carboxymethylcellulose.

  8. Dan Connelly said:

    A study should also include something simple, like oatmeal with some unsweetened soy milk, etc,
    to assess the need for these overprocessed recovery drink powders in the first place.

    please don't offer me breakfast if i ever stay over.

    suz turned me onto chocolate milk as a "recovery drink". since it tastes
    good, i'm more likely to drink it when i'm tired out.

    heather

  9. Dan Connelly said:


    gwhite said:

    What does "overprocessed" mean? The "processed" drinks don't have fiber? They
    are more concentrated? I have used OptiFuel II (and Metabolol) and it was
    basically a *complete* food, aside from little or no fat. Personally I would
    tune in more closely to the "overpriced" aspect when looking at options rather
    than worrying about how much it was "processed."

    Well, to start with, acesulfame-K basically stands out as a red flag. I am not going
    to peruse the very deep list any deeper.

    "More than 90 studies have demonstrated the safety of acesulfame K. The U.S.
    Food and Drug Administration permitted the use of acesulfame K after evaluating
    numerous studies and determining it is safe for its intended use."
    http://www.caloriecontrol.org/acesulf.html

    So you think a small amount, once a week or so is a danger? Obviously some are
    yelling "CANCER." I am not disbelieving, but skeptical.

    Quoted message said:

    Ingredients:
    Metacarb Plus (proprietary carbohydrate blend comprised of: maltodextrin and enzyme modified food starch),
    PEPTOL PER4+ (proprietary protein-amino acid blend containing: egg albumen, whey protein concentrate,
    calcium caseinate, milk protein isolate, L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L valine, L-phenylalanine, L-methionine,
    L-threonine, L-lysine, L-carnitine HCl and L-glutamic acid), fructose, whey, dutch cocoa powder,
    onfat milk, medium chain triglycerides, lecithin, Metavite (proprietary vitamin-mineral formulation
    which includes: calcium carbonate, magnesium oxide, magnesium lysinate, di-calcium phosphate,
    inositol, calcium citrate, molybdenum aspartate, potassium phosphate, iron succinate, zinc citrate,
    d-alpha tocopherol succinate, copper glycinate, choline bitartrate, zinc picolinate, niacin, manganese
    citrate, calcium pantothenate, selenium methionate, retinyl palmitate, thiamine HCl, pyridoxal-5-phosphate,
    riboflavin-5-phosphate, pyridoxine alpha-ketoglutarate [PAK], chromium nicotinyl, chromium polynicotinate,
    yanocobalamin, vitamin D3, potassium iodide, d-biotin, folic acid, lipoic acid, and intrinsic factor complex), \
    natural flavoring, inosine, calcium lactate, xanthan food gum, acesulfame-K, Succinate ETF (proprietary succinate
    compound that includes: potassium succinate, magnesium succinate, calcium succinate, L-glutamic acid), Ester C®
    (esterified calcium polyascorbate), carrageenan, carboxymethylcellulose.

    Looks like food to me. I don't think "processed" for its own sake can be called
    "bad." It's like the old hippy complaining about "chemicals." What isn't a
    chemical? Look what chemotherapy did for LANCE!!!!!

  10. gwhite said:


    Dan Connelly said:

    gwhite wrote:
    Well, to start with, acesulfame-K basically stands out as a red flag. I am not going
    to peruse the very deep list any deeper.

    "More than 90 studies have demonstrated the safety of acesulfame K. The U.S.
    Food and Drug Administration permitted the use of acesulfame K after evaluating
    numerous studies and determining it is safe for its intended use."
    http://www.caloriecontrol.org/acesulf.html

    So you think a small amount, once a week or so is a danger? Obviously some are
    yelling "CANCER." I am not disbelieving, but skeptical.

    It's an oft-recommended policy, one to which I adhere, to try and
    choose whole foods when possible. Cancer, or whatever. We don't know the effect of
    long-term exposure to this stuff. Once a week? Fine, I'm sure. But my point is
    that a study needs to consider alternatives to product X and water.

    Quoted message said:

    Looks like food to me. I don't think "processed" for its own sake can be called
    "bad." It's like the old hippy complaining about "chemicals." What isn't a
    chemical? Look what chemotherapy did for LANCE!!!!!

    Made his hair fall out?

    Dan

  11. h squared said:

    please don't offer me breakfast if i ever stay over.

    Hmmm... maybe we need to take this discussion off-line 🙂.

    (just kidding)

    Dan

  12. To really take this topic in another direction, I found Yohoo! to be an excellent recovery drink. It has lots of potassium (added to keep the cocoa is suspension), calcium and a bit of sodium for electrolytes. It has whey which is easily digestible protein and just a tiny bit of fat. Its cheap, tastes great and has never upset my stomach.

  13. "Rick Roof" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Powerbar recovery or Endurox R4? What about Accelerade vs. Powerbar
    hydrate. Anyone have experience with any of these products. Taste?

    Thanks

    I've used Endurox R4 in the past and it has worked for me. I like it
    because it is filling enough to let me do the post ride things I need
    to do, put things away, stretch, shower, etc. It seemed to help me
    with the tired heavy legs during the day after a long ride. It seemed
    to do what it is advertised to do.

    I prefer the fruit punch flavor.

    Andy

  14. h squared said:
    Dan Connelly said:

    A study should also include something simple, like oatmeal with some unsweetened soy milk, etc,
    to assess the need for these overprocessed recovery drink powders in the first place.

    please don't offer me breakfast if i ever stay over.

    suz turned me onto chocolate milk as a "recovery drink". since it tastes
    good, i'm more likely to drink it when i'm tired out.

    When I got out of college no one in apartment I was living in had a
    lot of money. But one of my housemates did deliver high-end icecream
    as his job. So every few weeks he would bring home one of those big
    drums of ice cream, usually some sort of chocolate.

    We ate that a lot -- for breakfast, snacks, whatever. One way was
    with oatmeal..

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  15. Weisse Luft said:


    To really take this topic in another direction, I found Yohoo!

    I like the taste and feel of Yoohoo, but contains trans fats which
    can't be good.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  16. Dan Connelly said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's an oft-recommended policy, one to which I adhere, to try and
    choose whole foods when possible.

    I eat oatmeal almost every day and look what has happened.

  17. "h squared" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    suz turned me onto chocolate milk as a "recovery drink". since it tastes
    good, i'm more likely to drink it when i'm tired out.

    Hmm. After my Cape in a Day Ride (140 miles Boston-PTown), the beer on the
    ferry tasted *awfully* good.

    Is beer the new recovery drink?

    🙂

    Lee

  18. Sounds like real evidence to me folks!

    There you have it, "...It seems to do what it is advertised to do!"

    Sorry man, that was pretty classic.

    CH

    It seemed to do what it is advertised to do.

    Quoted message said:


    I prefer the fruit punch flavor.

    Andy

  19. Sounds like real evidence to me folks!

    There you have it, "...It seems to do what it is advertised to do!"

    Sorry man, that was pretty classic.

    CH

    It seemed to do what it is advertised to do.

    Quoted message said:


    I prefer the fruit punch flavor.

    Andy

  20. Sounds like real evidence to me folks!

    There you have it, "...It seems to do what it is advertised to do!"

    Sorry man, that was pretty classic.

    CH

    It seemed to do what it is advertised to do.

    Quoted message said:


    I prefer the fruit punch flavor.

    Andy

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.