Road Cycling · Public discussion

Recommended Reading

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 6 posts · 495 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
19 November 2005
Last activity
24 November 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
495
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Okay, I admit it, I'm both too busy, and too cheap, to buy these
    magazines. I'm waiting 'til I can get to the library and read them for
    free. Meanwhile:

    The latest Popular Science has an article on the 100 best inventions of
    the year. One of, briefly glimpsed, was a bike with two wheels in the
    back, canted inward so that they seemed almost to touch at the top.

    And this month's Outside has an article on the controversy surrounding
    Lance Armstrong these days. The subtitle said something like, "the
    conspiracy to drag down a champion."

    Anybody already read these?

    Bill, suddenly noticing how nice it's been around here without the Cloud

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    | An animal will leave a carcus after he gets his belly full, |
    | but you never see a banker do that sort of thing. |
    | --Butch Cassidy |
    ---------------------------------------------------------------

  2. Quoted message said:

    The latest Popular Science has an article on the 100 best inventions of
    the year. One of, briefly glimpsed, was a bike with two wheels in the
    back, canted inward so that they seemed almost to touch at the top.

    It's only that way when sitting still or moving very slow. When it
    starts moving faster, the wheels cant outward so they almost touch (or
    perhaps do touch) at the bottom. Handles like a bike when moving, won't
    fall over when stopped.

    I read about it somewhere on the web. An interesting idea.

    Rich

  3. Quoted message said:

    Okay, I admit it, I'm both too busy, and too cheap, to buy these
    magazines. I'm waiting 'til I can get to the library and read them for
    free. Meanwhile:

    The latest Popular Science has an article on the 100 best inventions of
    the year. One of, briefly glimpsed, was a bike with two wheels in the
    back, canted inward so that they seemed almost to touch at the top.

    It's been discussed here before -- basically an art student's take on
    bicycle design <snicker>. A "solution" looking for a problem -- best case.

  4. Damn, I thought you were recommending something in my home town
    (Reading, Berkshire)

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

  5. Peter Cole said:

    It's been discussed here before -- basically an art student's take on
    bicycle design <snicker>. A "solution" looking for a problem -- best case.

    I finally read the article. The bike (really a trike) is
    unconventional all over, frame and wheels included. The rear wheels tilt
    inward when it's going slow or stopped, and outward at higher speeds.
    Built-in training wheels, IOW. The frame of this contraption is something
    I can't begin to describe in mere text, and the wheels are really wild,
    one piece things with only two "spokes." Picture the Greek letter theta.
    Truly a solution looking for a problem.

    Bill

    __o |Watch out now, take care, beware of greedy leaders
    _`\(,_ |They take you where you should not go...
    (_)/ (_) | --George Harrison

  6. This slant-wheeled tricycle in Pop Sci looks like the cheap kind of
    garishly-colored plastic junk that young parents buy for their kids at
    Wal-Mart. At only $100., I wouldn't expect it to perform any better
    than that sort of throwaway stuff. This magazine has degenerated into
    nothing much more than a promotional rag to boost frivilous
    overconsumption.
    However, they did show the Canon XL-H1, a high-achieving,
    high-definition camcorder that has members of video forums in a frenzy
    of lust for it.

    Steve McDonald

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.