Pete Desautelle said:I am considering a new bike, but was told to avoid a carbon fiber frame due
to my size. I am 6'4" and about 230. I've spoken with some bigger riders
who say that the carbon flexes too much.
Can any of you bigger riders offer advice as to type of material that might
suit me? Sure Titanium would work out great if I had an extra 5000 bones to
spare!
Probably at this point, you just want to go out for a local ride,
going as fast as possible (as opposed to entering competition). That
being the case, you want something durable, because my experience is
that many bike parts are designed for people under 200 pounds and will
break in short order for heavy people, especially stuff designed for
racing (i.e. carbon fiber, though your experience may vary).
Cyclocross framesets are generally strong and on the affordable side.
Gunnar is pretty affordable. Surly is even a little more affordable,
but is a bit heavier. Being over 200 pounds myself, I tend to dispose
of frames. You don't have to be too over-analytical. You ride some
something, learn the good and bad points of the bike, then make a more
educated choice the next time. If its really bad, you just put it up
on EBay and buy what you should have bought, since bike parts are a
commodity. Heck, I've sold even partial headsets on EBay. Having said
all this, I am now riding a Waterford X-11, but I was very impressed
with an aluminum Nashbar touring frame that I had a few years ago.
When you're over 200, ignore all the posters saying that aluminum
frames are too stiff. I do NOT want a frame that is flexy. Aluminum
frames are nice. They are light and often inexpensive. If the ride is
too harsh, put on fatter tires. The bad point is that after a lot of
riding, they will crack, but then I have already cracked my Waterford
X-11 too (fixed under warranty). Being a former BMX racer, I'm trying
to avoid riding my bike hard, treating red to green lights like a gate
start.