General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Recommendation: Wild Camping Stove

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 9 posts · 311 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 January 2005
Last activity
30 January 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
311
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Any suggestions?

  2. Quoted message said:

    Any suggestions?

    Plenty: can you narrow down your intended uses a bit? "wild camping"
    covers an awful lot of ground.

    For example, are you wild camping primarily for wild camping, or as just
    something as a stopover while backpacking? If the emphasis is on
    walking then lighter weight and lower bulk becomes more important, if
    it's more on the camping then something to make the cooking easier (more
    stable, easier to windshield) is probably better.

    Fuel decision will be based on a variety of factors, such as how often
    will you need to resupply and where will that be possible.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. Hopefully helpful parameters?

    [1] definitely walking, therefore lighter weight and lower bulk is
    important.

    [2] Also do not intending on being out for many days so not intending
    to need a resupply.

    .....so far this year 6 summits
    New - 6 (Marilyns 6 (1 county top), Sweats 0, Outlying Fells
    0)
    Repeats - 0 (Marilyns 0, Sweats 0, Wainwrights 0, Outlying Fells
    0)

  4. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hopefully helpful parameters?

    [1] definitely walking, therefore lighter weight and lower bulk is
    important.

    [2] Also do not intending on being out for many days so not intending
    to need a resupply.


    You could go for an MSR Pocket Rocket.

    Nick

  5. Nick Pedley said:

    You could go for an MSR Pocket Rocket.

    This seems to be the de-facto standard for a very light and low bulk
    stove. Gotchas are it's not the world's most stable stove (in common
    with just about any other cannister mounted stove) and being relatively
    tall it's more awkward to shield well from the wind. There are similar
    ones out there, like the wee Outdoor Designs Titanium one.

    Both issues raised above are addressed by the Windpro (and similar), so
    you decide whether the extra weight and bulk is worth it. It's still
    not /that/ heavy.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  6. * The air of uk.rec.walking was filled with the delicate perfume
    * of violets, as Nick Pedley <[email hidden]>
    * descended on a shaft of golden sunlight, and announced:

    Quoted message said:

    You could go for an MSR Pocket Rocket.

    Or a Coleman F1 Lite - lighter, cheaper and just as efficient.

    Jim Ford

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hopefully helpful parameters?

    [1] definitely walking, therefore lighter weight and lower bulk is
    important.

    [2] Also do not intending on being out for many days so not intending
    to need a resupply.


    You could go for an MSR Pocket Rocket.


    Or the primus micron, at a similar size & weight. If you want to boil
    water the PR is best, but if cooking and summering are key, the micron
    has a more controllable and better spread flame.

    --
    Darren
    mail to darren not ng

  8. I've got the pocket rocket - stability is almost guarenteed with three
    spare tent pegs (I use cheapo Argos alu ones) with the bends nestled
    over the cannister. Peter Clinch is right though, if it's windy it is a
    little high to shield effectively

  9. In message <[email hidden]>,
    Stuey <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I've got the pocket rocket - stability is almost guarenteed with three
    spare tent pegs (I use cheapo Argos alu ones) with the bends nestled
    over the cannister. Peter Clinch is right though, if it's windy it is a
    little high to shield effectively


    Foil windscreens work fine and are very light. Most aren't quite tall
    enough so I staple two together. I put the windscreen round 3/4 round
    the stove, which allows enough of a gap to ensure the cartridge stays
    cool.

    Details of how to make a more sophisticated windscreen here:

    http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/00041.html

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.