In article <[email hidden]>,
John Forrest Tomlinson said:On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 04:26:06 GMT, Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-
SHOESbomb.com said:In article <[email hidden]>,
Richard Adams <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:John McCain for VP? Nope nope nope, but he sure looks
better as a president then Dubya, as time goes by.
I always thought McCain could be a bit of a hot-head,
and, while I still think that, I now think he'd be
unlikely to something stupid when he was [censored]. No
lashing out like "make some heads roll" Bush.
I disagree with a lot of McCain's politics (except
regarding international security) but the thing I like A
LOT about him is honesty. He's principaled and emotional
and doesn't just try to spin things his way. Compare him
to G. W. Bush and the Bush administration. It's night
and day.
JT
The "principaled" part of that is what makes him a not-so-
good "politician", at least as we see what that is right
now. I do agree with your take on him, though. With the
Bush admin., politics takes precedence over policy 100%
of the time.
From Paul Krugman
(nybooks.com16911):Open ↗ "According to
people who observed him in Texas, Karl Rove is a devotee
of Machiavelli, and particularly of The Prince . And as
Phillips points out, "Twenty-first-century American
readers of The Prince may feel that they have stumbled on
a thinly disguised Bush White House political memo." For
Machiavelli's book was all about how to gain and hold
power, not about what to do with it."
--
tanx, Howard
"Copper will never be gold" Shellac
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?