UK and Europe · Public discussion

Rear mech serendipity

Started by Just zis Guy, you know? · · Last activity · 6 posts · 315 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
3 April 2005
Last activity
4 April 2005
Original author
Just zis Guy, you know?
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
315
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Not that it would be reasonable to characterise cheap Shimano mechs as
    [censored] or anything, but the cheap 7-speed Shimano rear mech on Michael's
    bike has had it. The pivots have all gone so loose that the jockey
    wheels are flapping in the breeze and shifting is erratic.

    So I tried the spare Deore 9-speed mech I had in my box'o'bits,
    expecting to have to do some nonsense with the cable pulls to get it
    to work. Imagine my surprise when it worked flawlessly straight away!
    No need to run the cable the wrong side of the pinch bolt or any of
    the other wheezes suggested for making mismatched components work
    together.

    So, if your Tourney rear mech falls apart, I reckon a Deore one will
    drop straight in to replace it. Which is a Good Thing since the Giant
    Boulder Michael's been looking at for his birthday has Tourney, while
    the equivalent Dawes has a much better Sram drivetrain but a
    significantly less good front fork.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

  2. Just zis Guy said:

    Not that it would be reasonable to characterise cheap Shimano mechs as
    [censored] or anything, but the cheap 7-speed Shimano rear mech on Michael's
    bike has had it. The pivots have all gone so loose that the jockey
    wheels are flapping in the breeze and shifting is erratic.

    So I tried the spare Deore 9-speed mech I had in my box'o'bits,
    expecting to have to do some nonsense with the cable pulls to get it
    to work. Imagine my surprise when it worked flawlessly straight away!
    No need to run the cable the wrong side of the pinch bolt or any of
    the other wheezes suggested for making mismatched components work
    together.

    Yup, apart from some odd Dura-Ace stuff, all Shimano 6,7,8 or 9 speed
    rear mechs are compatible.

  3. Just zis Guy said:

    So I tried the spare Deore 9-speed mech I had in my box'o'bits,
    expecting to have to do some nonsense with the cable pulls to get it
    to work. Imagine my surprise when it worked flawlessly straight away!
    No need to run the cable the wrong side of the pinch bolt or any of
    the other wheezes suggested for making mismatched components work
    together.

    The wheezes are for mixing Shimano and Campag

    ~PB

  4. Just zis Guy said:

    Not that it would be reasonable to characterise cheap Shimano mechs as
    [censored] or anything, but the cheap 7-speed Shimano rear mech on Michael's
    bike has had it. The pivots have all gone so loose that the jockey
    wheels are flapping in the breeze and shifting is erratic.

    So I tried the spare Deore 9-speed mech I had in my box'o'bits,
    expecting to have to do some nonsense with the cable pulls to get it
    to work. Imagine my surprise when it worked flawlessly straight away!
    No need to run the cable the wrong side of the pinch bolt or any of
    the other wheezes suggested for making mismatched components work
    together.

    So, if your Tourney rear mech falls apart, I reckon a Deore one will
    drop straight in to replace it. Which is a Good Thing since the Giant
    Boulder Michael's been looking at for his birthday has Tourney, while
    the equivalent Dawes has a much better Sram drivetrain but a
    significantly less good front fork.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

    You shouldn't be so surprised, don't try it with Campag though.

  5. Just zis Guy said:

    So I tried the spare Deore 9-speed mech I had in my box'o'bits,
    expecting to have to do some nonsense with the cable pulls to get it
    to work. Imagine my surprise when it worked flawlessly straight away!
    No need to run the cable the wrong side of the pinch bolt or any of
    the other wheezes suggested for making mismatched components work
    together.

    Those 9-speed Deore mechs are fantastic value IMO. I replaced a slighly
    dodgy 8-speed Acera mech with one and the difference was immediately
    noticable. It shifts brilliantly.

    --
    jc

    Remove the -not from email

  6. Jeremy Collins said:

    Those 9-speed Deore mechs are fantastic value IMO. I replaced a slighly
    dodgy 8-speed Acera mech with one and the difference was immediately
    noticable. It shifts brilliantly.

    This one was: SFP, sitting unused in my spares bin. Mind you, it was
    only there because I'd spent a several of your earth "zbarl units" on
    an XT one for the 'bent...

    On the subject of which, I have now fitted an Avid Rollamajig to the
    back end of the 'bent, which has improved shifitng dramatically. It
    has a trailing arm which is more or less horizontal, so the cable has
    to bent through a sharp 180 before entering the mech. The rollamajig
    has this down to about a 70 degree gentle curve, much better.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.