Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Rear brake bolt too short

Started by Jeff · · Last activity · 6 posts · 986 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 May 2003
Last activity
21 May 2003
Original author
Jeff
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
986
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The rear brake bolt on my 1997ish Shimano 105 is short - goes into the bridge does not protrude out
    the other side.

    The bridge on my 1988 Trek has a small hole - a recessed nut will not fit

    Any ideas, group? Replace the bolt? Drill the brake bridge?

  2. Disregard, I found the answer. Checked the archives, found a few things including this:
    sheldonbrown.comgloss r.html

    "Jeff" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The rear brake bolt on my 1997ish Shimano 105 is short - goes into the bridge does not protrude
    out the other side.

    The bridge on my 1988 Trek has a small hole - a recessed nut will not fit

    Any ideas, group? Replace the bolt? Drill the brake bridge?

  3. Jeff said:

    Disregard, I found the answer. Checked the archives, found a few things including this:
    sheldonbrown.comgloss r.html

    A thinner washer may help as well if the existing one is thick.

    ~PB

  4. In article said:

    The rear brake bolt on my 1997ish Shimano 105 is short - goes into the bridge does not protrude out
    the other side.

    The bridge on my 1988 Trek has a small hole - a recessed nut will not fit

    Any ideas, group? Replace the bolt? Drill the brake bridge?

    I assume your fork is drilled for recessed style, a lot of Treks were recessed on front and nutted
    on back. If true, get a long recessed brake nut and use it to mount the rear brake on the front.
    Put the front brake on the back with a nut. I got my long recessed nut from icyclesusa.com, I think
    it was $4-5.

    --Paul

  5. Paul has the answer I like!

    The Trek's front is drilled for recessed nuts, rear is not. I like Paul's suggestion, get a long nut
    for the front, swap calipers back-for-front.

    Checked icyclesusa.com and loosescrews.com, both have promising stuff.

    icyclesusa.com (they say bolt, it's really a nut) 23mm titanium brake bolt 30mm aluminum brake bolt

    loosescrews.com 22mm steel nut

    Paul Southworth said:
    Jeff said:

    The rear brake bolt on my 1997ish Shimano 105 is short - goes into the bridge does not protrude
    out the other side.

    The bridge on my 1988 Trek has a small hole - a recessed nut will not fit

    Any ideas, group? Replace the bolt? Drill the brake bridge?

    I assume your fork is drilled for recessed style, a lot of Treks were recessed on front and nutted
    on back. If true, get a long recessed brake nut and use it to mount the rear brake on the front.
    Put the front brake on the back with a nut. I got my long recessed nut from icyclesusa.com, I
    think it was $4-5.

    --Paul

  6. Quoted message said:

    I assume your fork is drilled for recessed style, a lot of Treks were recessed on front and nutted
    on back. If true, get a long recessed brake nut and use it to mount the rear brake on the front.
    Put the front brake on the back with a nut. I got my long recessed nut from icyclesusa.com, I think
    it was $4-5.

    --Paul

    I have done this with apparent success. When buying new brakes for an older frame like this, I
    suggest buying two front brakes.

    jon

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.