Road Cycling · Public discussion

Reading Between The Lines

Started by B. Lafferty · · Last activity · 25 posts · 618 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 April 2006
Last activity
26 April 2006
Original author
B. Lafferty
Posts
25
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
618
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 25
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    I'm glad Floyd won it," said LeMond after the race. "I like Floyd. I met him
    a few times when he was riding with Mercury about five years ago. He's quite
    a funny character. He's had a phenomenal start to his year with Tour of
    California and Paris-Nice and now this. I know he lost this race last year,
    but I think he's at a different level this year. He proved his worth today.
    It was cool, it was almost cat and mouse. It was funny to watch the two
    interact, because Tom thought he was dropping Floyd, and Floyd would come
    right up on his side. It was good exciting racing. Instead of one guy just
    attacking and dominating, they were very equal. That's what made it such a
    great race. Obviously they were very close in the time trial and finished
    side by side in the climb, so they both could have merited the victory."

  2. "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    I'm glad Floyd won it," said LeMond after the race. "I like Floyd. I met
    him a few times when he was riding with Mercury about five years ago. He's
    quite a funny character. He's had a phenomenal start to his year with Tour
    of California and Paris-Nice and now this. I know he lost this race last
    year, but I think he's at a different level this year. He proved his worth
    today. It was cool, it was almost cat and mouse. It was funny to watch the
    two interact, because Tom thought he was dropping Floyd, and Floyd would
    come right up on his side. It was good exciting racing. Instead of one guy
    just attacking and dominating, they were very equal. That's what made it
    such a great race. Obviously they were very close in the time trial and
    finished side by side in the climb, so they both could have merited the
    victory."


    Don't know what invisible ink you're seeing but I don't read ANYTHING that
    knocks either Discovery or Armstrong. Didn't you have a Conspiracy
    Theorists convention in NO to attend this weekend?

  3. "matabala" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    I'm glad Floyd won it," said LeMond after the race. "I like Floyd. I met
    him a few times when he was riding with Mercury about five years ago.
    He's quite a funny character. He's had a phenomenal start to his year
    with Tour of California and Paris-Nice and now this. I know he lost this
    race last year, but I think he's at a different level this year. He
    proved his worth today. It was cool, it was almost cat and mouse. It was
    funny to watch the two interact, because Tom thought he was dropping
    Floyd, and Floyd would come right up on his side. It was good exciting
    racing. Instead of one guy just attacking and dominating, they were very
    equal. That's what made it such a great race. Obviously they were very
    close in the time trial and finished side by side in the climb, so they
    both could have merited the victory."

    Quoted message said:

    Don't know what invisible ink you're seeing but I don't read ANYTHING that
    knocks either Discovery or Armstrong. Didn't you have a Conspiracy
    Theorists convention in NO to attend this weekend?

    Oh, OK. My error.

  4. B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?

  5. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?

    Damn. And here I though I had my Lemond glasses on today.

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?

    Do you think lance will get mention on brian's tombstone?

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    routebeer said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?

    Do you think lance will get mention on brian's tombstone?

    Just below ground level...

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  8. "Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    routebeer said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    B. Lafferty wrote:
    > No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?

    Do you think lance will get mention on brian's tombstone?


    Quoted message said:

    Just below ground level...

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Is it true Lance wants to be buried with his missing testicle?

  9. On 4/23/06 3:13 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "B. Lafferty"

    Quoted message said:


    "Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    routebeer said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > B. Lafferty wrote:
    >> No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:
    >
    > must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?
    >

    Do you think lance will get mention on brian's tombstone?


    Quoted message said:

    Just below ground level...

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Is it true Lance wants to be buried with his missing testicle?


    Are you going to give it back to him?
    Are you done testing it for drugs yet??

  10. B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    <snip>

    Dumbass -

    From:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2006/apr06/georgia06/?id=/news/2006/apr06/apr23news3

    <snip>

    Danielson describes that tactics behind the last leg to the finish as
    being very cautious. "We both respect each other a lot. He knows what I
    am doing and I know what he is doing. So, in the end I was waiting for
    Popovich and Landis was not pedaling but then again, why should he
    pedal when he is in the leader's jersey?

    <snip>

    Like I said a couple of days ago; Floyd is one of the best riders in
    the world and to be up there with him is a very special thing for me.

    <snip>

  11. "ST" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 4/23/06 3:13 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "B. Lafferty"

    Quoted message said:


    "Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "routebeer" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >>
    >> B. Lafferty wrote:
    >>> No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:
    >>
    >> must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?
    >>
    >
    > Do you think lance will get mention on brian's tombstone?

    Quoted message said:

    Just below ground level...

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Is it true Lance wants to be buried with his missing testicle?


    Are you going to give it back to him?
    Are you done testing it for drugs yet??


    Dude, if I had his removed testicle, I'd sell it on eBay to one of his many
    rbr acolytes, bank the money and kiss your sorry asses goodbye.

  12. B. Lafferty said:

    Is it true Lance wants to be buried with his missing testicle?

    i thought havlicek stole the ball...

  13. Like Lemond only used mineral water ...
    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?

    Damn. And here I though I had my Lemond glasses on today.

  14. "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Like Lemond only used mineral water ...

    At least he never had a positive finding.

    Quoted message said:

    "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    B. Lafferty wrote:
    > No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?

    Damn. And here I though I had my Lemond glasses on today.

  15. "B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Dude, if I had his removed testicle, I'd sell it on eBay to one of his
    many rbr acolytes, bank the money and kiss your sorry asses goodbye.

    How much did the love letter he wrote in junior high schol sell for a couple
    of years ago?

  16. B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    I'm glad Floyd won it," said LeMond after the race. "I like Floyd. I met him
    a few times when he was riding with Mercury about five years ago. He's quite
    a funny character. He's had a phenomenal start to his year with Tour of
    California and Paris-Nice and now this. I know he lost this race last year,
    but I think he's at a different level this year. He proved his worth today.
    It was cool, it was almost cat and mouse. It was funny to watch the two
    interact, because Tom thought he was dropping Floyd, and Floyd would come
    right up on his side. It was good exciting racing. Instead of one guy just
    attacking and dominating, they were very equal. That's what made it such a
    great race. Obviously they were very close in the time trial and finished
    side by side in the climb, so they both could have merited the victory."

    So when he mentions Armstrong, it's a slam on Armstrong, and
    when he doesn't mention Armstrong, it's a double-dog extra rude
    diss of Armstrong? Is Armstrong even in the race this year?

    It's all about the Armstrongs,
    Ben

  17. Quoted message said:
    B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    I'm glad Floyd won it," said LeMond after the race. "I like Floyd. I
    met him a few times when he was riding with Mercury about five years
    ago. He's quite a funny character. He's had a phenomenal start to his
    year with Tour of California and Paris-Nice and now this. I know he
    lost this race last year, but I think he's at a different level this
    year. He proved his worth today. It was cool, it was almost cat and
    mouse. It was funny to watch the two interact, because Tom thought he
    was dropping Floyd, and Floyd would come right up on his side. It was
    good exciting racing. Instead of one guy just attacking and
    dominating, they were very equal. That's what made it such a great
    race. Obviously they were very close in the time trial and finished
    side by side in the climb, so they both could have merited the
    victory."

    So when he mentions Armstrong, it's a slam on Armstrong, and
    when he doesn't mention Armstrong, it's a double-dog extra rude
    diss of Armstrong? Is Armstrong even in the race this year?

    It's all about the Armstrongs,
    Ben

    And the drugs.

    --
    Bill Asher

  18. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    I'm glad Floyd won it," said LeMond after the race. "I like Floyd. I met
    him
    a few times when he was riding with Mercury about five years ago. He's
    quite
    a funny character. He's had a phenomenal start to his year with Tour of
    California and Paris-Nice and now this. I know he lost this race last
    year,
    but I think he's at a different level this year. He proved his worth
    today.
    It was cool, it was almost cat and mouse. It was funny to watch the two
    interact, because Tom thought he was dropping Floyd, and Floyd would come
    right up on his side. It was good exciting racing. Instead of one guy
    just
    attacking and dominating, they were very equal. That's what made it such
    a
    great race. Obviously they were very close in the time trial and finished
    side by side in the climb, so they both could have merited the victory."

    So when he mentions Armstrong, it's a slam on Armstrong, and
    when he doesn't mention Armstrong, it's a double-dog extra rude
    diss of Armstrong? Is Armstrong even in the race this year?

    Armstrong was there for at least one stage. No reports of them running into
    each other.

    Quoted message said:


    It's all about the Armstrongs,
    Ben

  19. Quoted message said:
    B. Lafferty said:

    No love lost on Discovery or Mr. Armstrong:

    must everything be viewed through your LANCE filter?

    I haven't the slightest doubt that were Brian to meet THE LANCE,
    face-to-face, instead of asking him the cutting questions Brian poses
    here, that he'd just about slobber all over THE LANCE'S shoes, and
    nearly wet himself in excitement.

    Why else would he be so obsessed? It's love.

    CritPOSER

  20. Quoted message said:

    I haven't the slightest doubt that were Brian to meet THE LANCE,
    face-to-face, instead of asking him the cutting questions Brian poses
    here, that he'd just about slobber all over THE LANCE'S shoes, and
    nearly wet himself in excitement.

    Depending on who LANCE is dating at the time I think a lot
    of us might wet ourselves in excitement.

    Bob Schwartz

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.